GNU bug report logs - #62720
29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot

Previous Next

Full log

Message #392 received at 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com, philipk <at> posteo.net,
 dmitry <at> gutov.dev, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, larsi <at> gnus.org
Subject: Re: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages
 like Eglot
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 20:20:20 +0100

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 7:51 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> Why not?
>
> More generally, why does it make sense not to have in Emacs the latest
> stable version of every core package at the time of the release?

Well, my answer to that would be: for the same reason it makes sense
for like new features not to go into Emacs release branches after
they have been cut.

The Eglot release 1.14 is not as stable as 1.12.29. It has new features.
Also a recent bugfix in commit a74403adda0 is quite complex and
I'm cautiously waiting for feedback.  Other simple bugfixes have
been backported.

So I'm not much different than most maintainers in that aspect, I suppose.
I also think stock Emacs releases should be very stable, despite
what you may think from my stance on this particular matter :-)

But if someone types M-x install-something they should get what
they ask for.  If they want to be 100% safe, they just shouldn't
invoke commands that download, compile and evaluate code.

Notwithstanding this personal opinion, I underline again that
it _is_ possible to craft a simple, emacs-29-safe modification,
to the package-install function that is even more cautious to
download certain types of things.

João

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.