GNU bug report logs - #62720
29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:11:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.60

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora <at> gmail.com, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:40:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
>> Cc: joaotavora <at> gmail.com,  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,  62720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>>   larsi <at> gnus.org
>> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 19:14:37 +0000
>> 
>> > Are we still sure we want to change package-install, not
>> > package-upgrade?  AFAIU, there were several voices that preferred the
>> > latter, with the rationale that a built-in package is always
>> > "installed", so "installing" it makes little or no sense.
>> 
>> If you want that, here is one proposal.  Should be the smallest so far:
>
> Hmm... looks identical to the previous patch you sent, which changes
> package-install?  Or what am I missing?
>
> As for the question I asked: I'm okay with changing package-install if
> there are no objections from those who proposed to change
> package-upgrade instead.

Did I send the wrong patch.  I double-checked now and this one should be
using package-update:

[0001-Allow-package-update-to-upgrade-built-in-packages.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 18 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.