GNU bug report logs - #62700
29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>

Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.60

Fixed in version 30.0.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #89 received at 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: sbaugh <at> catern.com
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, sbaugh <at> janestreet.com, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: Re: bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion
 behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 21:38:52 +0000 (UTC)
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: sbaugh <at> catern.com
>> Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 12:57:57 +0000 (UTC)
>> Cc: 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, sbaugh <at> janestreet.com, juri <at> linkov.net
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> > And here we seem to be modifying code that is not only for when
>> > minibuffer-completion-auto-choose is non-nil, or what am I missing?
>> 
>> The bug happens regardless of the value of
>> minibuffer-completion-auto-choose.  It doesn't relate to
>> minibuffer-completion-auto-choose.
>
> I asked for the changes to affect only code specific to M-<UP> and
> M-<DOWN>, but the patch you posted doesn't limit itself to that,
> AFAICT.  Or what am I missing?

Ah, I didn't realize that was what you were asking for.  I can do that,
certainly, but why not also cover M-RET?  The bug exists in the exact
same form for M-RET and it will be confusing (though better than
nothing, definitely) if the fix applies to M-<UP> and M-<DOWN> but not
M-RET.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 39 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.