GNU bug report logs - #62700
29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>

Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.60

Fixed in version 30.0.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #74 received at 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
Cc: 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, sbaugh <at> catern.com, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: Re: bug#62700: 29.0.60;
 minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively
 when point is not at end of buffer
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 22:00:16 +0300
> Cc: 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> catern.com>
> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:46:45 -0400
> 
> Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> writes:
> >>>>> It just needs more testing for different categories of completion.
> >>>>
> >>>> Which categories do you have in mind?
> >>>
> >>> Actually, I can't find categories where it could fail.
> >>> So your patch looks safe to push.
> >>
> >> Can we go ahead and push it to Emacs master, then?  I will work on the
> >> changing-only-new-code backport for Emacs 29 as Eli requested.
> >
> > But your patch changes only new code.
> 
> Ah, I thought Eli still wanted a backport version because this changes
> code which has been on Emacs 29 for over a year.

Indeed, that's what I would like to see on the release branch.  Mainly
because even if this is deemed a bug, it happens in a relatively rare
situation, so I'd like to avoid risking breakage in code which affects
other situations.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 39 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.