GNU bug report logs - #62700
29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>

Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 17:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.60

Fixed in version 30.0.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #38 received at 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: sbaugh <at> catern.com
Cc: 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, sbaugh <at> janestreet.com, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: Re: bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion
 behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 16:19:56 +0300
> From: sbaugh <at> catern.com
> Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 10:58:36 +0000 (UTC)
> Cc: 62700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, sbaugh <at> janestreet.com, juri <at> linkov.net
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > If this is for master, I'm fine with such changes.  But if you intend
> > to request installing this on emacs-29, then I will object making
> > non-trivial changes in any code that is not specific to the M-<UP> and
> > M-<DOWN> bindings that are new in Emacs 29.  I don't want to risk any
> > regressions in general-purpose completion code at this late stage.
> 
> OK, that's no problem, this can be done by just let-binding
> completion-base-affixes in minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion
> so that it only affects new code.

Thanks.

> That will be a bit uglier to read so I'll do that if this approach
> seems reasonable with some review.

We can install the cleaner change on master, and the "uglier" one only
on the release branch.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 39 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.