GNU bug report logs - #62677
Merge flyspell-mode with flyspell-prog-mode

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, stefankangas <at> gmail.com, 62677 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62677: 30.0.50; Need to find a better name for flyspell-prog-mode
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 10:09:31 +0300

> From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  michael_heerdegen <at> web.de,
>   jporterbugs <at> gmail.com,  62677 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 09:30:16 +0300
> 
> > Here's the plan I'd propose: Add a new defvar-local
> > `flyspell-use-prog-mode' or somesuch that major modes can set.  Now,
> > when a user enables `flymake-mode' in a buffer where that variable is
> > non-nil, the extra stuff done in `flyspell-prog-mode' gets done too.
> > Then decide which built-in major modes that would benefit, and set that
> > variable in them.
> >
> > Would `prog-mode' be a candidate though, or do we expect any modes
> > inheriting from it to want the regular `flyspell-mode'?
> 
> Removing flyspell-prog-mode will break a lot of user configs
> that often contain such a pair:
> 
>   (add-hook 'text-mode-hook 'flyspell-mode)
>   (add-hook 'prog-mode-hook 'flyspell-prog-mode)

There's no intent to remove flyspell-prog-mode, just to make
flyspell-mode more intelligent.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.