GNU bug report logs - #62677
Merge flyspell-mode with flyspell-prog-mode

Previous Next

Full log

Message #35 received at 62677 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel <at> gmail.com>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Cc: 62677 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: Re: bug#62677: 30.0.50; Need to find a better name for
 flyspell-prog-mode
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 14:14:20 +0200

On Wed,  5 Apr 2023 at 19:44, Michael Heerdegen wrote:

> Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> writes:
>
>> > We should obsolete it and find a better one.
>>
>> Too late to rename it because it runs 'flyspell-prog-mode-hook'
>> customized by users.
>
> Can't we use a `defvaralias' like in other places?
>
> Michael.

I don't think a name tweak is useful.  If an improvement is at all
necessary, then just get rid of flyspell-prog-mode, that is, make
flyspell-mode skip keywords and the like by default in prog-derived
modes.  This is what is intended 99.7% of the time.

For the remaining 0.3% of the cases, it's more productive to provide an
easier way to customize what is ignored by Flyspell, using e.g. the
`spelling-ignore-functions' hook I suggested in the emacs-devel thread.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.