GNU bug report logs - #62570
[PATCH 0/6] Fix name and dependencies of a few Texlive packages

Previous Next

Full log

Message #40 received at 62570-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, Timothy Sample <samplet <at> ngyro.com>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 62570-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#62570] [PATCH 3/6] gnu: texlive-latex-bigfoot: Replace
 with texlive-bigfoot.
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:30:57 +0200

Hello,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> So, do we (not only the two of us, obviously) agree on the
> `simple-texlive-package' approach? If so, what should we do about
> "source"?

I applied the whole set. The question above is still open, but I'm
closing this particular report for now.

Thank you for your input.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.