GNU bug report logs - #62570
[PATCH 0/6] Fix name and dependencies of a few Texlive packages

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, Timothy Sample <samplet <at> ngyro.com>, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 62570 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#62570] [PATCH 3/6] gnu: texlive-latex-bigfoot: Replace with texlive-bigfoot.
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:35:14 +0200

Hi,

Thanks for your explanations.

On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 at 20:01, Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:

> Unfortunately, there are other old TeXLive packages in this very same
> sad situation.

Well, one after the other, they will be converted. :-)


>>  2. Which of the both is the closest of upstream structure?
>
> The new package checkout matches exactly the layout of the full TeXLive
> distribution.

Now, I have to check if this content is registered by Software
Heritage. :-)

Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.