From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 23 07:47:09 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2010 11:47:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OG9e8-0006P3-AH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 07:47:08 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OG9e6-0006Oh-4F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 07:47:06 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:42243) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OG9e0-0005St-OL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 07:47:00 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53291 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OG9dz-0002q7-5Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 07:46:59 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OG9dx-0000aM-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 07:46:58 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:34361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OG9dx-0000aH-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 07:46:57 -0400 Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so134572gwb.0 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 04:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=EWXQ5Y+Z3xrfxAniBeHF0iHboayNJv0cEEr9szInivM=; b=GPPywvNEMPICSSpj8o4HZUgg4Dllkb3+x73zWYWIULpixlDv8la3bJZ1ZdRxOcY8xi 52wF7XI7O8bviWFz03PdEY99rMzCvWUHb7eqTspuiyGgCbYzmjEk5FIT1BpGq7wkpN+F b06ypEb6CH/ryZRmKO19g1jkbRzoocHZgF7qY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=nDurrYQ8rMJ8Nl+awvfwsNNUvd16jxwE4XHSaeHF3bnUgFBv+GfL7BLQNuM/eR5KhR mn73XcGNEWBf6VPTtJuywmDpR+A4cyKHw8ekCAYrGnAheZjwQ7BkwWHLK5amV6wOPW25 SxKdkAy+qBPX3KgZ4HkCZuic78rEmigVzwYVk= Received: by 10.101.29.7 with SMTP id g7mr4543869anj.236.1274615217181; Sun, 23 May 2010 04:46:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Sun, 23 May 2010 04:46:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 13:46:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Please resize mini-buffer for queries even if resize-mini-windows is nil To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) Otherwise you just see the last line of a multiple line query prompt. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 23 09:43:17 2010 Received: (at 6253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2010 13:43:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGBSW-0007Uh-GQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 09:43:17 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGBSU-0007Uc-K7 for 6253@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 09:43:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEADrO+EtFpZMM/2dsb2JhbACeD3K8EYUTBIw/ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,285,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="64873220" Received: from 69-165-147-12.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.147.12]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 23 May 2010 09:43:03 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 25C078266; Sun, 23 May 2010 09:43:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: bug#6253: Please resize mini-buffer for queries even if resize-mini-windows is nil Message-ID: References: Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 09:43:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 23 May 2010 13:46:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6253 Cc: 6253@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > Otherwise you just see the last line of a multiple line query prompt. Hmm... IIUC when the user sets resize-mini-windows to nil, that's because she doesn't want this resizing. And multiline prompts are a problem (in cases where resizing is simply impossible, for example) in any case. So I think the right thing to do is to report the "multiline prompts" as bugs. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 23 09:50:20 2010 Received: (at 6253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2010 13:50:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGBZM-0007Xt-4r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 09:50:20 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f203.google.com ([209.85.211.203]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGBZJ-0007Xo-BV for 6253@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 09:50:17 -0400 Received: by ywh41 with SMTP id 41so1256115ywh.9 for <6253@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 May 2010 06:50:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hE01BdwlgndEta4qJpY22wMrdLMXz6/1HCDFHkjwDYg=; b=v2SYE8NW3O4osVfHhlDJwEv59nShuPDcwVWPXiXk1bLuAdGvLBpzmtAlSryaVjBjJG i6gqCqxUMoMyorKy3cRkD7aiRoSBQ+e8rnxNwjDG/yp5ndgzkcjA+ops19LCEyqijhG0 zJSEHarnaweKRpOPjNTlDyn2kTdnUiDsJdHgg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=piBG3nLdIkDqzrO2zR8UaU4pbv0LqjMDIfStQlh6i/vg2PGvcdEWCneWJ/dTPJHrN6 HagThdKExV09PKqx1cTLlHs/SfSU7+RO3vZ+6q5vIHKRH1L+d52B44k0wEoYwaLi1uFU gm/PbU3p94v/348Yh997ZLA6KCQe3+n/MlJrc= Received: by 10.100.233.4 with SMTP id f4mr5051149anh.217.1274622612124; Sun, 23 May 2010 06:50:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Sun, 23 May 2010 06:49:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 15:49:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6253: Please resize mini-buffer for queries even if resize-mini-windows is nil To: Stefan Monnier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6253 Cc: 6253@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Otherwise you just see the last line of a multiple line query prompt. > > Hmm... IIUC when the user sets resize-mini-windows to nil, that's > because she doesn't want this resizing. > And multiline prompts are a problem (in cases where resizing is simply > impossible, for example) in any case. =C2=A0So I think the right thing to= do > is to report the "multiline prompts" as bugs. I think what the user normally want is to avoid messages that resizes the miniwindow. I guess most users want to see the whole multiline prompt. Why not distinguish between those cases? Maybe a new value for resize-mini-windows. With regards to multiline prompts please remember that a "short" prompt may wrap because it includes something that is long. That could for example be the case when the prompt includes a file path. So beeing able to always resize the mini window is useful whatever we do. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 23 10:11:11 2010 Received: (at 6253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2010 14:11:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGBtW-0007hE-HU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 10:11:10 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGBtV-0007h9-30 for 6253@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 10:11:09 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABvU+EtFpZMM/2dsb2JhbACeD3K8AYUTBIw/ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,285,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="64873857" Received: from 69-165-147-12.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.147.12]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 23 May 2010 10:11:03 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 273D18266; Sun, 23 May 2010 10:10:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: bug#6253: Please resize mini-buffer for queries even if Message-ID: References: Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 10:10:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 23 May 2010 15:49:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6253 Cc: 6253@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > Why not distinguish between those cases? Maybe a new value for > resize-mini-windows. Ah, you mean a setting that allows resizing minibuffers but not the echo area. Yes, that seems reasonable (tho it may bump into some surprising cases where the user may think he's interacting with a minibuffer whereas she's really looking at the echo area). I'd first want to see a patch for it, Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 23 18:25:06 2010 Received: (at 6253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2010 22:25:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGJbV-0002tz-Hk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 18:25:06 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f223.google.com ([209.85.217.223]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGJbT-0002tb-Pm for 6253@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 18:25:04 -0400 Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so414924gxk.15 for <6253@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:24:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GnAAjjo9UDr6eeDU3EWNFxVh+EFRb7U/mp6SNfmj5Pk=; b=t9nyaAxcbwgP68JGsoftS26fltyyh5xS8GKlMjRTaQ4zEVfgk1/rtjU3Vlv5NMyFaf n+F4eFAqg98NvWXF5hsYOQ2yjLZkiTfdwV6ebEgzbwWiyorTfq8hUdBSjZXFMl6VfP9/ LFrOTN+pNud2WozxSipYi8GRUNr7Rf4OMp6Sg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=VuiMJ26DpQmrc+ckBr+qKef5GxOmjW/AerjvyC90av3FbDltg9VkKytvqqYdZ+99Az 0vkOCFXdPFA8ThHR9gyssIp+IqGWe+ZmAssV4FZurZEYaiAIDdKfLWTrzIeirkdt97z0 UkSIjhbYOR5OUwX9GpDky2f3Ns4vzxEYvKwRk= Received: by 10.100.246.26 with SMTP id t26mr5612718anh.112.1274653499362; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:24:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.177.20 with HTTP; Sun, 23 May 2010 15:24:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 00:24:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6253: Please resize mini-buffer for queries even if To: Stefan Monnier Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=00504502b0870a8d9504874a65df X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6253 Cc: 6253@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) --00504502b0870a8d9504874a65df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Why not distinguish between those cases? Maybe a new value for >> resize-mini-windows. > > Ah, you mean a setting that allows resizing minibuffers but not the > echo area. =C2=A0Yes, that seems reasonable (tho it may bump into some > surprising cases where the user may think he's interacting with > a minibuffer whereas she's really looking at the echo area). > > I'd first want to see a patch for it, Thanks. I looked for read_filtered_event too in the sources. I have attached a patch. --00504502b0870a8d9504874a65df Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name="resize-mini-windows-1.diff" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="resize-mini-windows-1.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_g9kfr0qq0 DQoNCj09PSBtb2RpZmllZCBmaWxlICdzcmMvZm5zLmMnDQotLS0gdHJ1bmsvc3JjL2Zucy5jCTIw MTAtMDQtMjUgMjI6MTY6NTggKzAwMDANCisrKyBwYXRjaGVkL3NyYy9mbnMuYwkyMDEwLTA1LTIz IDIyOjEzOjM0ICswMDAwDQpAQCAtMjU3Nyw2ICsyNTc3LDkgQEANCiAgIExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IGFy Z3NbMl07DQogICBzdHJ1Y3QgZ2Nwcm8gZ2Nwcm8xLCBnY3BybzI7DQogICBpbnQgY291bnQgPSBT UEVDUERMX0lOREVYICgpOw0KKyAgTGlzcF9PYmplY3Qgb2xkX1ZyZXNpemVfbWluaV93aW5kb3dz ID0gVnJlc2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3M7DQorDQorICBzcGVjYmluZCAoUWN1cnNvcl9pbl9lY2hv X2FyZWEsIFF0KTsNCiANCiAgIHNwZWNiaW5kIChRY3Vyc29yX2luX2VjaG9fYXJlYSwgUXQpOw0K IA0KQEAgLTI2MTYsMTMgKzI2MTksMzggQEANCiANCiAgICAgICB7DQogCUxpc3BfT2JqZWN0IHBh cmdzWzNdOw0KLQ0KLQkvKiBDb2xvcml6ZSBwcm9tcHQgYWNjb3JkaW5nIHRvIGBtaW5pYnVmZmVy LXByb21wdCcgZmFjZS4gICovDQorICAgICAgICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBmYWNlOw0KKyAgICAgICAg TGlzcF9PYmplY3QgcHJvcHM7DQorICAgICAgICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCB1c2VfZmFjZTsNCisgICAg ICAgIExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IGVsdDsNCisNCisgICAgICAgIGZhY2UgPSBpbnRlcm4oImZhY2UiKTsN CisgICAgICAgIHByb3BzID0gRnN5bWJvbF92YWx1ZSAoaW50ZXJuICgibWluaWJ1ZmZlci1wcm9t cHQtcHJvcGVydGllcyIpKTsNCisgICAgICAgIHVzZV9mYWNlID0gUW5pbDsNCisNCisgICAgICAg IC8qIENvbG9yaXplIHByb21wdCBhY2NvcmRpbmcgdG8gYG1pbmlidWZmZXItcHJvbXB0LXByb3Bl cnRpZXMnLiAgKi8NCisgICAgICAgIHVzZV9mYWNlID0gaW50ZXJuKCJkZWZhdWx0Iik7DQorICAg ICAgICB3aGlsZSAoMSkNCisgICAgICAgICAgew0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgIGlmICghQ09OU1AgKHBy b3BzKSB8fCBFUSAoWENBUiAocHJvcHMpLCBmYWNlKSkNCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGJyZWFrOw0K Kw0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgIHByb3BzID0gWENEUiAocHJvcHMpOw0KKyAgICAgICAgICB9DQorICAg ICAgICBpZiAoQ09OU1AgKHByb3BzKSkNCisgICAgICAgICAgew0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgIHByb3Bz ID0gWENEUiAocHJvcHMpOw0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgIGlmIChDT05TUCAocHJvcHMpKQ0KKyAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgew0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB1c2VfZmFjZSA9IFhDQVIgKHByb3BzKTsNCisg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIH0NCisgICAgICAgICAgfQ0KIAlwYXJnc1swXSA9IGJ1aWxkX3N0cmluZyAo IiVzKHkgb3IgbikgIik7DQogCXBhcmdzWzFdID0gaW50ZXJuICgiZmFjZSIpOw0KLQlwYXJnc1sy XSA9IGludGVybiAoIm1pbmlidWZmZXItcHJvbXB0Iik7DQorICAgICAgICBwYXJnc1syXSA9IHVz ZV9mYWNlOw0KIAlhcmdzWzBdID0gRnByb3BlcnRpemUgKDMsIHBhcmdzKTsNCiAJYXJnc1sxXSA9 IHhwcm9tcHQ7DQorICAgICAgICBWcmVzaXplX21pbmlfd2luZG93cyA9IFF0Ow0KIAlGbWVzc2Fn ZSAoMiwgYXJncyk7DQogICAgICAgfQ0KIA0KQEAgLTI2MzcsNiArMjY2NSw4IEBADQogDQogICAg ICAgdGVtcG9yYXJpbHlfc3dpdGNoX3RvX3NpbmdsZV9rYm9hcmQgKFNFTEVDVEVEX0ZSQU1FICgp KTsNCiAgICAgICBvYmogPSByZWFkX2ZpbHRlcmVkX2V2ZW50ICgxLCAwLCAwLCAwLCBRbmlsKTsN CisgICAgICBtZXNzYWdlICgwKTsgLyogUmVzaXplLiAqLw0KKyAgICAgIFZyZXNpemVfbWluaV93 aW5kb3dzID0gb2xkX1ZyZXNpemVfbWluaV93aW5kb3dzOw0KICAgICAgIGN1cnNvcl9pbl9lY2hv X2FyZWEgPSAwOw0KICAgICAgIC8qIElmIHdlIG5lZWQgdG8gcXVpdCwgcXVpdCB3aXRoIGN1cnNv cl9pbl9lY2hvX2FyZWEgPSAwLiAgKi8NCiAgICAgICBRVUlUOw0KDQoNCg0KPT09IG1vZGlmaWVk IGZpbGUgJ3NyYy9taW5pYnVmLmMnDQotLS0gdHJ1bmsvc3JjL21pbmlidWYuYwkyMDEwLTAxLTEz IDA4OjM1OjEwICswMDAwDQorKysgcGF0Y2hlZC9zcmMvbWluaWJ1Zi5jCTIwMTAtMDUtMjMgMjE6 NTM6MjIgKzAwMDANCkBAIC01NTgsNyArNTU4LDcgQEANCiANCiAgIC8qIElmIHRoZSBtaW5pYnVm ZmVyIGlzIG9uIGFuIGljb25pZmllZCBvciBpbnZpc2libGUgZnJhbWUsDQogICAgICBtYWtlIGl0 IHZpc2libGUgbm93LiAgKi8NCi0gIEZtYWtlX2ZyYW1lX3Zpc2libGUgKG1pbmlfZnJhbWUpOw0K KyAgRm1ha2VfZnJhbWVfdmlzaWJsZSAobWluaV9mcmFtZSwgUW5pbCk7DQogDQogICBpZiAobWlu aWJ1ZmZlcl9hdXRvX3JhaXNlKQ0KICAgICBGcmFpc2VfZnJhbWUgKG1pbmlfZnJhbWUpOw0KQEAg LTU3NiwxMyArNTc2LDE0IEBADQogCSAgICAgRmNvbnMgKG1pbmlidWZfd2luZG93LA0KIAkJICAg IG1pbmlidWZfc2F2ZV9saXN0KSk7DQogICBtaW5pYnVmX3NhdmVfbGlzdA0KLSAgICA9IEZjb25z IChtaW5pYnVmX3Byb21wdCwNCisgICAgPSBGY29ucyAoVnJlc2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3MsDQor ICAgICAgICAgRmNvbnMgKG1pbmlidWZfcHJvbXB0LA0KIAkgICAgIEZjb25zIChtYWtlX251bWJl ciAobWluaWJ1Zl9wcm9tcHRfd2lkdGgpLA0KIAkJICAgIEZjb25zIChWaGVscF9mb3JtLA0KIAkJ CSAgIEZjb25zIChWY3VycmVudF9wcmVmaXhfYXJnLA0KIAkJCQkgIEZjb25zIChWbWluaWJ1ZmZl cl9oaXN0b3J5X3Bvc2l0aW9uLA0KIAkJCQkJIEZjb25zIChWbWluaWJ1ZmZlcl9oaXN0b3J5X3Zh cmlhYmxlLA0KLQkJCQkJCW1pbmlidWZfc2F2ZV9saXN0KSkpKSkpOw0KKwkJCQkJCW1pbmlidWZf c2F2ZV9saXN0KSkpKSkpKTsNCiANCiAgIHJlY29yZF91bndpbmRfcHJvdGVjdCAocmVhZF9taW5p YnVmX3Vud2luZCwgUW5pbCk7DQogICBtaW5pYnVmX2xldmVsKys7DQpAQCAtNTk3LDYgKzU5OCw3 IEBADQogDQogICBtaW5pYnVmX3Byb21wdF93aWR0aCA9IDA7DQogICBtaW5pYnVmX3Byb21wdCA9 IEZjb3B5X3NlcXVlbmNlIChwcm9tcHQpOw0KKyAgVnJlc2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3MgPSBRdDsN CiAgIFZtaW5pYnVmZmVyX2hpc3RvcnlfcG9zaXRpb24gPSBoaXN0cG9zOw0KICAgVm1pbmlidWZm ZXJfaGlzdG9yeV92YXJpYWJsZSA9IGhpc3R2YXI7DQogICBWaGVscF9mb3JtID0gVm1pbmlidWZm ZXJfaGVscF9mb3JtOw0KQEAgLTkwMyw2ICs5MDUsNyBAQA0KIHsNCiAgIExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IG9s ZF9kZWFjdGl2YXRlX21hcms7DQogICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCB3aW5kb3c7DQorICBMaXNwX09iamVj dCB0ZW1wX1ZyZXNpemVfbWluaV93aW5kb3dzOw0KIA0KICAgLyogSWYgdGhpcyB3YXMgYSByZWN1 cnNpdmUgbWluaWJ1ZmZlciwNCiAgICAgIHRpZSB0aGUgbWluaWJ1ZmZlciB3aW5kb3cgYmFjayB0 byB0aGUgb3V0ZXIgbGV2ZWwgbWluaWJ1ZmZlciBidWZmZXIuICAqLw0KQEAgLTkxNCw2ICs5MTcs MTQgQEANCiAgIEZzZXRfYnVmZmVyIChYV0lORE9XICh3aW5kb3cpLT5idWZmZXIpOw0KIA0KICAg LyogUmVzdG9yZSBwcm9tcHQsIGV0YywgZnJvbSBvdXRlciBtaW5pYnVmZmVyIGxldmVsLiAgKi8N CisgIHRlbXBfVnJlc2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3MgPSBGY2FyIChtaW5pYnVmX3NhdmVfbGlzdCk7 DQorICBtaW5pYnVmX3NhdmVfbGlzdCA9IEZjZHIgKG1pbmlidWZfc2F2ZV9saXN0KTsNCisgIG1l c3NhZ2UgKDApOyAvKiBSZXNpemUuICovDQorICAvKiBDaGVjayBpZiBjaGFuZ2VkIGluIG1pbmli dWZmZXIsIG90aGVyd2lzZSByZXNldDogKi8NCisgIGlmIChGZXEgKFF0LCBWcmVzaXplX21pbmlf d2luZG93cykpDQorICAgIHsNCisgICAgICBWcmVzaXplX21pbmlfd2luZG93cyA9IHRlbXBfVnJl c2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3M7DQorICAgIH0NCiAgIG1pbmlidWZfcHJvbXB0ID0gRmNhciAobWlu aWJ1Zl9zYXZlX2xpc3QpOw0KICAgbWluaWJ1Zl9zYXZlX2xpc3QgPSBGY2RyIChtaW5pYnVmX3Nh dmVfbGlzdCk7DQogICBtaW5pYnVmX3Byb21wdF93aWR0aCA9IFhGQVNUSU5UIChGY2FyIChtaW5p YnVmX3NhdmVfbGlzdCkpOw0KDQoNCg0KPT09IG1vZGlmaWVkIGZpbGUgJ3NyYy9scmVhZC5jJw0K LS0tIHRydW5rL3NyYy9scmVhZC5jCTIwMTAtMDQtMjAgMDE6NTA6NTIgKzAwMDANCisrKyBwYXRj aGVkL3NyYy9scmVhZC5jCTIwMTAtMDUtMjMgMjA6MTM6MzEgKzAwMDANCkBAIC04MDAsMTEgKzgw MCwxNyBAQA0KICAgICAgTGlzcF9PYmplY3QgcHJvbXB0LCBpbmhlcml0X2lucHV0X21ldGhvZCwg c2Vjb25kczsNCiB7DQogICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCB2YWw7DQorICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBvbGRfVnJl c2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3MgPSBWcmVzaXplX21pbmlfd2luZG93czsNCisgIFZyZXNpemVfbWlu aV93aW5kb3dzID0gUXQ7DQogDQogICBpZiAoISBOSUxQIChwcm9tcHQpKQ0KICAgICBtZXNzYWdl X3dpdGhfc3RyaW5nICgiJXMiLCBwcm9tcHQsIDApOw0KICAgdmFsID0gcmVhZF9maWx0ZXJlZF9l dmVudCAoMSwgMSwgMSwgISBOSUxQIChpbmhlcml0X2lucHV0X21ldGhvZCksIHNlY29uZHMpOw0K IA0KKyAgaWYgKCEgTklMUCAocHJvbXB0KSkNCisgICAgICBtZXNzYWdlICgwKTsgLyogUmVzaXpl LiAqLw0KKyAgVnJlc2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3MgPSBvbGRfVnJlc2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3M7 DQorDQogICByZXR1cm4gKE5JTFAgKHZhbCkgPyBRbmlsDQogCSAgOiBtYWtlX251bWJlciAoY2hh cl9yZXNvbHZlX21vZGlmaWVyX21hc2sgKFhJTlQgKHZhbCkpKSk7DQogfQ0KQEAgLTgyMiw5ICs4 MjgsMTkgQEANCiAgICAgIChwcm9tcHQsIGluaGVyaXRfaW5wdXRfbWV0aG9kLCBzZWNvbmRzKQ0K ICAgICAgTGlzcF9PYmplY3QgcHJvbXB0LCBpbmhlcml0X2lucHV0X21ldGhvZCwgc2Vjb25kczsN CiB7DQorICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCB2YWw7DQorICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBvbGRfVnJlc2l6ZV9taW5p X3dpbmRvd3MgPSBWcmVzaXplX21pbmlfd2luZG93czsNCisgIFZyZXNpemVfbWluaV93aW5kb3dz ID0gUXQ7DQorDQogICBpZiAoISBOSUxQIChwcm9tcHQpKQ0KICAgICBtZXNzYWdlX3dpdGhfc3Ry aW5nICgiJXMiLCBwcm9tcHQsIDApOw0KLSAgcmV0dXJuIHJlYWRfZmlsdGVyZWRfZXZlbnQgKDAs IDAsIDAsICEgTklMUCAoaW5oZXJpdF9pbnB1dF9tZXRob2QpLCBzZWNvbmRzKTsNCisgIHZhbCA9 IHJlYWRfZmlsdGVyZWRfZXZlbnQgKDAsIDAsIDAsICEgTklMUCAoaW5oZXJpdF9pbnB1dF9tZXRo b2QpLCBzZWNvbmRzKTsNCisNCisgIGlmICghIE5JTFAgKHByb21wdCkpDQorICAgICAgbWVzc2Fn ZSAoMCk7IC8qIFJlc2l6ZS4gKi8NCisgIFZyZXNpemVfbWluaV93aW5kb3dzID0gb2xkX1ZyZXNp emVfbWluaV93aW5kb3dzOw0KKw0KKyAgcmV0dXJuIHZhbDsNCiB9DQogDQogREVGVU4gKCJyZWFk LWNoYXItZXhjbHVzaXZlIiwgRnJlYWRfY2hhcl9leGNsdXNpdmUsIFNyZWFkX2NoYXJfZXhjbHVz aXZlLCAwLCAzLCAwLA0KQEAgLTg0NSwxMiArODYxLDE4IEBADQogICAgICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBw cm9tcHQsIGluaGVyaXRfaW5wdXRfbWV0aG9kLCBzZWNvbmRzOw0KIHsNCiAgIExpc3BfT2JqZWN0 IHZhbDsNCisgIExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IG9sZF9WcmVzaXplX21pbmlfd2luZG93cyA9IFZyZXNpemVf bWluaV93aW5kb3dzOw0KKyAgVnJlc2l6ZV9taW5pX3dpbmRvd3MgPSBRdDsNCiANCiAgIGlmICgh IE5JTFAgKHByb21wdCkpDQogICAgIG1lc3NhZ2Vfd2l0aF9zdHJpbmcgKCIlcyIsIHByb21wdCwg MCk7DQogDQogICB2YWwgPSByZWFkX2ZpbHRlcmVkX2V2ZW50ICgxLCAxLCAwLCAhIE5JTFAgKGlu aGVyaXRfaW5wdXRfbWV0aG9kKSwgc2Vjb25kcyk7DQogDQorICBpZiAoISBOSUxQIChwcm9tcHQp KQ0KKyAgICAgIG1lc3NhZ2UgKDApOyAvKiBSZXNpemUuICovDQorICBWcmVzaXplX21pbmlfd2lu ZG93cyA9IG9sZF9WcmVzaXplX21pbmlfd2luZG93czsNCisNCiAgIHJldHVybiAoTklMUCAodmFs KSA/IFFuaWwNCiAJICA6IG1ha2VfbnVtYmVyIChjaGFyX3Jlc29sdmVfbW9kaWZpZXJfbWFzayAo WElOVCAodmFsKSkpKTsNCiB9DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCj09PSBtb2RpZmllZCBmaWxlICdzcmMv bGlzcC5oJw0KLS0tIHRydW5rL3NyYy9saXNwLmgJMjAxMC0wNS0xNSAyMToxOTowNSArMDAwMA0K KysrIHBhdGNoZWQvc3JjL2xpc3AuaAkyMDEwLTA1LTIzIDE1OjQ3OjQ3ICswMDAwDQpAQCAtMjYy NSw2ICsyNjI1LDcgQEANCiBleHRlcm4gdm9pZCBzYWZlX2Jjb3B5IFBfICgoY29uc3QgY2hhciAq LCBjaGFyICosIGludCkpOw0KIA0KIC8qIERlZmluZWQgaW4geGRpc3AuYyAqLw0KK2V4dGVybiBM aXNwX09iamVjdCBWcmVzaXplX21pbmlfd2luZG93czsNCiBleHRlcm4gTGlzcF9PYmplY3QgUWlu aGliaXRfcG9pbnRfbW90aW9uX2hvb2tzOw0KIGV4dGVybiBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBRaW5oaWJpdF9y ZWRpc3BsYXksIFFkaXNwbGF5Ow0KIGV4dGVybiBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBRaW5oaWJpdF9ldmFsX2R1 cmluZ19yZWRpc3BsYXk7DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQo= --00504502b0870a8d9504874a65df-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 21 16:22:14 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2011 20:22:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6TJ7-0005Zt-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:22:14 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6TJ6-0005Zn-V9 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:22:13 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R6TIk-0005oq-F7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:21:50 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:18:24 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6253 X-MailScanner-ID: 1R6TIk-0005oq-F7 X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1317241310.53546@vp0OG56pZgR79yZfbw6aPg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) tags 6253 patch From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 11 07:15:16 2012 Received: (at 6253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2012 11:15:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50423 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvW8-0003hT-F5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:15:16 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42227) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvW4-0003hK-UX for 6253@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:15:14 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvUp-00006c-VE; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:13:56 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Lennart Borgman Subject: Re: bug#6253: Please resize mini-buffer for queries even if References: X-Now-Playing: Various's _Crammed Global Soundclash 1980-89, Part One: World Fusion_: "Hermine - Blue Angel" Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:13:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 24 May 2010 00:24:39 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MailScanner-ID: 1SHvUp-00006c-VE X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1334747636.06841@ZU80xT6djQ/CJ0qATwZIWg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6253 Cc: 6253@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Lennart Borgman writes: >> Ah, you mean a setting that allows resizing minibuffers but not the >> echo area. =A0Yes, that seems reasonable (tho it may bump into some >> surprising cases where the user may think he's interacting with >> a minibuffer whereas she's really looking at the echo area). Yeah, sounds like a good idea. > I have attached a patch. I've read the patch, and it looks good to me. Do we want to discuss this any further, or should I just apply the patch? We also need a patch for the doc string and the manual, though. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 11 08:57:53 2012 Received: (at 6253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2012 12:57:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50724 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHx7Q-0001ug-Ol for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:57:53 -0400 Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:14970) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHx7N-0001uX-NW for 6253@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:57:50 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjEKACxOgk9FxL8q/2dsb2JhbABDtheCDAOBDIEIggkBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHAW2MothhHkEpEWBXYMD X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="173302542" Received: from 69-196-191-42.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.191.42]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 Apr 2012 08:56:41 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2744458D2B; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:56:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#6253: Please resize mini-buffer for queries even if Message-ID: References: Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:56:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:13:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6253 Cc: 6253@debbugs.gnu.org, Lennart Borgman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > I've read the patch, and it looks good to me. Do we want to discuss > this any further, or should I just apply the patch? The patch I have (see below) doesn't look applicable as-is. See comments below. > --- trunk/src/fns.c 2010-04-25 22:16:58 +0000 > +++ patched/src/fns.c 2010-05-23 22:13:34 +0000 > @@ -2577,6 +2577,9 @@ > Lisp_Object args[2]; > struct gcpro gcpro1, gcpro2; > int count = SPECPDL_INDEX (); > + Lisp_Object old_Vresize_mini_windows = Vresize_mini_windows; > + > + specbind (Qcursor_in_echo_area, Qt); > > specbind (Qcursor_in_echo_area, Qt); I don't think we need to specbind the same variable twice ;-) > @@ -2616,13 +2619,38 @@ > { > Lisp_Object pargs[3]; > - > - /* Colorize prompt according to `minibuffer-prompt' face. */ > + Lisp_Object face; > + Lisp_Object props; > + Lisp_Object use_face; > + Lisp_Object elt; > + > + face = intern("face"); > + props = Fsymbol_value (intern ("minibuffer-prompt-properties")); > + use_face = Qnil; > + > + /* Colorize prompt according to `minibuffer-prompt-properties'. */ > + use_face = intern("default"); > + while (1) > + { > + if (!CONSP (props) || EQ (XCAR (props), face)) > + break; > + > + props = XCDR (props); > + } > + if (CONSP (props)) > + { > + props = XCDR (props); > + if (CONSP (props)) > + { > + use_face = XCAR (props); > + } > + } > pargs[0] = build_string ("%s(y or n) "); > pargs[1] = intern ("face"); > - pargs[2] = intern ("minibuffer-prompt"); > + pargs[2] = use_face; This seems unrelated. Maybe it's a good change, but it should be submitted separately, and motivated. > - Fmake_frame_visible (mini_frame); > + Fmake_frame_visible (mini_frame, Qnil); That also seems unrelated. > + Vresize_mini_windows = Qt; The main problem with the patch is that this new behavior cannot be controlled. > + Lisp_Object old_Vresize_mini_windows = Vresize_mini_windows; > + Vresize_mini_windows = Qt; > > if (! NILP (prompt)) > message_with_string ("%s", prompt, 0); > > val = read_filtered_event (1, 1, 0, ! NILP (inherit_input_method), seconds); > > + if (! NILP (prompt)) > + message (0); /* Resize. */ > + Vresize_mini_windows = old_Vresize_mini_windows; This technique you've used at various places is unreliable. You want to use specbind+unbind instead. > --- trunk/src/lisp.h 2010-05-15 21:19:05 +0000 > +++ patched/src/lisp.h 2010-05-23 15:47:47 +0000 > @@ -2625,6 +2625,7 @@ > extern void safe_bcopy P_ ((const char *, char *, int)); > > /* Defined in xdisp.c */ > +extern Lisp_Object Vresize_mini_windows; > extern Lisp_Object Qinhibit_point_motion_hooks; > extern Lisp_Object Qinhibit_redisplay, Qdisplay; > extern Lisp_Object Qinhibit_eval_during_redisplay; This is not needed. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 27 13:12:12 2019 Received: (at 6253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2019 17:12:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXwS-0007VT-5x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:12:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45722) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXwQ-0007VJ-7D for 6253@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:12:10 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXwN-0007x2-AF; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:12:09 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#6253: Please resize mini-buffer for queries even if References: Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:12:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:56:40 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I've read the patch, and it looks good to me. Do we want to discuss >> this any further, or should I just apply the patch? > > The patch I have (see below) doesn't look applicable as-is. > See comm [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6253 Cc: 6253@debbugs.gnu.org, Lennart Borgman X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: >> I've read the patch, and it looks good to me. Do we want to discuss >> this any further, or should I just apply the patch? > > The patch I have (see below) doesn't look applicable as-is. > See comments below. That was nine years ago, so I doubt we're going to see much progress on this. I'm closing the bug report, but please reopen if we can proceed. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 27 13:12:19 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2019 17:12:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39465 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXwZ-0007Vt-ED for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:12:19 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXwX-0007Vk-Pk for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:12:18 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgXwV-0007xA-9n for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:12:17 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:12:15 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6253 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 6253 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 6253 quit From unknown Sun Aug 17 04:15:29 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator