GNU bug report logs - #62503
emacs-beframe

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62503: closed (emacs-beframe)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:51:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:50:35 +0200
with message-id <87h6u2klpg.fsf <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: [bug#62503] emacs-beframe
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #62503,
regarding emacs-beframe
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
62503: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62503
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: sourcepluck <at> posteo.net
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: emacs-beframe
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:44:26 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello wonderful maintainer(s) of Guix,

Jamie Cullen here. This is my first ever patch, first ever commit, first 
ever packaged package, first ever time doing anything mildly useful with 
Git, etc etc. Excitement is tantamount here.

Please don't hesitate to tell me about even the smallest modification on 
my side, and any length of an explanation here via mail. I'm ready to 
put the work in to get this lovely package right. At all times during 
the packaging process, I was vascillating between understanding 20-80% 
of what I was doing.

We got there though, and everything seems to be passing the tests.

I couldn't check "guix edit", I think because my EDITOR environment 
variable wasn't set up properly. I messed with it for ten minutes, it 
wouldn't work, but I'm pretty sure it was just a thing on my side and 
that the package is fine, because all other tests looked good -- after 
loads of faffing around of course, and carefully developing a loving 
relationship with the generous error messages being thrown at me :)

Thanks so much for all your work, you people are legends. I love Guix, 
and can see worlds opening up to me. Keep up the good fight.

Jamie

[0001-gnu-Add-emacs-beframe.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: sourcepluck <at> posteo.net
Cc: 62503-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#62503] emacs-beframe
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:50:35 +0200

Hello,

sourcepluck <at> posteo.net writes:

> Jamie Cullen here. This is my first ever patch, first ever commit,
> first ever packaged package, first ever time doing anything mildly
> useful with Git, etc etc. Excitement is tantamount here.

This sure is a good first patch. Since I had only nitpicks to write,
I applied it directly. Thank you!

> Please don't hesitate to tell me about even the smallest modification
> on my side, and any length of an explanation here via mail.

I wrote below what small changes I made to your package definition.

> +(define-public emacs-beframe
> +  (package
> +    (name "emacs-beframe")
> +    (version "0.2.0")
> +    (source (origin
> +              (method git-fetch)
> +              (uri (git-reference
> +                    (url "https://git.sr.ht/~protesilaos/beframe")
> +                    (commit "edfab6eefe4ac35cd8d1ed87fc7f670496d25e40")))

We don't usually insert commit hashes here, but rather bind hash to
`commit' and put (commit commit) above.

I a comment, I also mentioned the commit was actually a version bump,
which is the reason why there is no revision number.

> +              (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> +              (sha256
> +               (base32
> +                "0sd8r3icaj2gl7f62fyzlwkkb05mc3cwsqgicw0n1x07s5ir3129"))))
> +    (build-system emacs-build-system)
> +    (native-inputs (list texinfo))

Nitpick: native inputs are usually listed after arguments.

> +    (arguments
> +     (list
> +      #:phases
> +      #~(modify-phases
> +            %standard-phases
> +          (add-after 'install 'makeinfo
> +            (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)

Since you don't use `output' key, (lambda _ ...) is sufficient.

> +              (install-file
> +               "beframe.info"
> +               (string-append #$output "/share/info")))))))

Nitpick: I think a better indentation is:

  (install-file "beframe.info"
                (string-append #$output "/share/info"))

> +    (description
> +     "Beframe enables a frame-oriented Emacs workflow where each frame has
> +access to the list of buffers visited therein.  In the interest of brevity, we
> +call buffers that belong to frames \"beframed\".  Producing multiple
> frames does

In Texinfo, double quotes are ``...'', not "...".

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.