From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 27 09:14:11 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2023 13:14:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46772 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pgmfq-0005Ks-7t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:14:10 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46460) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pgidM-0003w6-S5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 04:55:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgidL-00062w-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 04:55:20 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgidJ-0003QE-O8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 04:55:19 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33EDD240191 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:55:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.jp; s=2017; t=1679907315; bh=TcR4z7vVRyzlEojJ7i9lemfO2xSgUZcM7Qdzx+DNE7c=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=koZUBW4DKBkvXOpt2sbjs1HxUzKi4pdUp8Jp8hKzdc46PFxYG7Nv5kuhyLEpd7EPG FBNp+sQ6N6bDmLQ6u3bWjjNFTK5J2bzfkFeRaVWFzhjUiCXjULQv+oMM3paqSehZ/S Cv+lxosMPlCWimjHFvswAcI17FhTeOxVAR2uNXA3PqeDfm8Pl4DyPdv5juHohe+Ghe G//x7pC6pC4x7ajs0DmElOd6r++qr90AZXtm5eADgAiB+m9mMbmLfPzTgO0qk3uSX+ X1+6LWxSKd1/Z+AvZm4tRSxwzyfsom7wLnRg2nF3TaeYXOBh3caZjSNwSGMRtI7GdB df1Gyx/GiFfNg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PlRTt0nvFz9rxM for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:55:14 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 08:55:14 +0000 From: c.buhtz@posteo.jp To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Unclear configure errors about =?UTF-8?Q?=22gl=5FPROG=5FCC=5FC=39?= =?UTF-8?Q?=39=22=20and=20=22gl=5FEARLY=22?= Mail-Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=c.buhtz@posteo.jp; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:14:05 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, beside I'm interested into how to solve that problem (what is IMHO=20 off-topic on that list) this message main intention is a bug report to=20 improve the output of a configure script. I have this two errors (?) running "configure". It is unclear what they=20 are mean. Even if I look into the "configure" script the meaning is=20 unclear to me. ./configure: line 5063: gl_PROG_CC_C99: command not found ./configure: line 5196: gl_EARLY: command not found Please improve the output of the script to make it easier to understand=20 it for the users, to prevent further support questions and lower the=20 workload for emacs "support channels". To reproduce: I cloned from git and switch to "emacs-29" branch. The machine is a=20 Raspberry Pi4 with Debian 11 (pure Debian, not rasbian). Because the configure script is missing (bug-report exists) I checked=20 the content of "configure.ac". It points out to use "autoconf" to=20 generate such a script. I did. $ autoconf configure.ac:55: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_ECHO If this token and others are legitimate, please use=20 m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure.ac:1777: error: possibly undefined macro: m4_default Two errors are there. I don't understand. But a "./configure" was=20 created. So I tried. $=C2=A0./configure checking for xcrun... no checking for GNU Make... make checking build system type... aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes =2E/configure: line 5063: gl_PROG_CC_C99: command not found checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes =2E/configure: line 5196: gl_EARLY: command not found checking whether gcc accepts -g3 -O2... yes checking whether the compiler is clang... no checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E =2E/configure: line 5555: syntax error near unexpected token `-Wno-switch' =2E/configure: line 5555: ` gl_WARN_ADD(-Wno-switch)' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 27 09:23:31 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2023 13:23:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pgmot-0005bU-8g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:23:31 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48968) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pgmor-0005bG-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:23:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgmor-00022z-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:23:29 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgmop-0000rx-KD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:23:28 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E127021F48; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 13:23:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1679923403; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R83ZtxxAoqC1bQn1J53YYlZVlMRZjOMd0gXFH8dz4Sk=; b=Au1/eV8LZRevZjLJ7v2oAy48DRyk7gRX/bNpkCWROSYFkWSpRnJNWSDniFbKxoOAH6QDZF l95csBBtZovGj5pxPEOUAt9JKqz4SQJUHxeY4ds3ZvXbXqaUMMT6d3cAzBytsP9JgsoJcc ootq1Ani5PqWhs3NYJl4ZUT7wcddrFA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1679923403; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R83ZtxxAoqC1bQn1J53YYlZVlMRZjOMd0gXFH8dz4Sk=; b=J8ICeCsJeG1LodiilRIzWH5lJiUFRbia05yA1oskOPC3dxZ2z98lWvPbtfJ7woW2lLCLwM VVqmYpvH6NdT8kDA== Received: from hawking.suse.de (unknown [10.168.4.11]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5DB2C141; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 13:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hawking.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 17005) id 7D8384A04E6; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:23:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: c.buhtz@posteo.jp Subject: Re: bug#62482: Unclear configure errors about "gl_PROG_CC_C99" and "gl_EARLY" References: X-Yow: Now I am depressed... Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:23:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: (c. buhtz's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2023 08:55:14 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.220.28; envelope-from=schwab@suse.de; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 62482@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Please read INSTALL.REPO. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 27 09:25:20 2023 Received: (at 62482) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2023 13:25:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pgmqc-0005eX-Sd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:25:20 -0400 Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:56232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pgmqZ-0005eO-MF for 62482@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:25:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1679923515; bh=Yb0JfKObPFjecMRGfWOgUFddshcrS82I0wM7q/UpHCw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=jX86DJ7V4a4+uLs6abDuISUUxamjOzK2h0iZ0xxypM/i1rjer0UGOpwK6TtmYGzor uB1bHzlbnGX8FyUuU29dD/U2QiMnvF5IcjWsBGTqWjbr2gqfFltJ+brqyD6PzY5H2L 0ycW1T4t6IlqtiF4yY97q6QMZ+PkVPwJIGWd5YKcMgHgXkTZXAi6gS4NcxEsWtLQz1 gGIq9bQUK5WtanDK5+oyve3UAdp9zLvtSrtDaAHkyzWC/zXbs1LBd7wbpDgnKxSpH1 GpLUK49aw84/0uMpkX2sbSeQAubpME2695per187hcQIQ7fDYECif9usSfmQjmLYZY 3S0DrolQQCwAA== Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 13:25:14 +0000 From: Gregory Heytings To: c.buhtz@posteo.jp Subject: Re: bug#62482: Unclear configure errors about "gl_PROG_CC_C99" and "gl_EARLY" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <728618716b76f44fd30b@heytings.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62482 Cc: 62482@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > > I have this two errors (?) running "configure". It is unclear what they > are mean. Even if I look into the "configure" script the meaning is > unclear to me. > > ./configure: line 5063: gl_PROG_CC_C99: command not found > ./configure: line 5196: gl_EARLY: command not found > Do you see these errors if you use "./autogen.sh", as explained in the INSTALL.REPO file? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 27 09:54:11 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2023 13:54:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46911 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pgnIY-0000T1-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:54:11 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pgnIU-0000Sq-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:54:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgnIU-0003bU-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:54:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgnIT-0005M5-I8; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:54:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=2golPs0tNPm1ABy0SHKE91IqAs6n0ucAWyuIFpdW5Sc=; b=d1vMeCPkhkfc mNMCWg1PT6CQI6vgEDM8tTd42J701yTIKS6vP+5k6DejdXPhAlJy99JMNbGp8ZOXE54T6bqNehnY2 9F6uxlRWeDBR3G1KWnZggffLx+BE09CgdrNnQO7tcjq8Y2UU6qYtTaw7sCQ72KmtBWS/+YnIJPidg Sefq1d4EqUuljH5Ql3DQ9KTafz2l1TCTyTWAH2BdrG4jXqow9fez1ktO7oz/ANRr0mOimXum7pDK/ v8kNgTuOTo4iQxZLW9pAOQCSZk8L/7FOOYwgOOzQAZu+eAXnOQasYwijkbce7zmuNN0KPt9Cpoli8 6mQZHrw4h1MnQDPWQCooEw==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pgnIS-0005Ic-Uw; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:54:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:54:08 +0300 Message-Id: <835yam9u67.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (c.buhtz@posteo.jp) Subject: Re: bug#62482: Unclear configure errors about "gl_PROG_CC_C99" and "gl_EARLY" References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 62482@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 62482 notabug thanks > Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 08:55:14 +0000 > From: c.buhtz@posteo.jp > > Hello, > > beside I'm interested into how to solve that problem (what is IMHO > off-topic on that list) this message main intention is a bug report to > improve the output of a configure script. > > I have this two errors (?) running "configure". It is unclear what they > are mean. Even if I look into the "configure" script the meaning is > unclear to me. > > ./configure: line 5063: gl_PROG_CC_C99: command not found > ./configure: line 5196: gl_EARLY: command not found > > Please improve the output of the script to make it easier to understand > it for the users, to prevent further support questions and lower the > workload for emacs "support channels". > > To reproduce: > > I cloned from git and switch to "emacs-29" branch. The machine is a > Raspberry Pi4 with Debian 11 (pure Debian, not rasbian). > > Because the configure script is missing (bug-report exists) I checked > the content of "configure.ac". It points out to use "autoconf" to > generate such a script. I did. > > $ autoconf > configure.ac:55: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_ECHO > If this token and others are legitimate, please use > m4_pattern_allow. > See the Autoconf documentation. > configure.ac:1777: error: possibly undefined macro: m4_default Please read INSTALL.REPO, which tells you to run ./autogen.sh script instead. Then such errors ought not to happen. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 30 02:23:44 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2023 06:23:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55524 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phlhI-0004uc-Aw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 02:23:44 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phlhD-0004uM-UL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 02:23:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phlhD-0003uD-O0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 02:23:39 -0400 Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phlhB-0002Ew-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 02:23:38 -0400 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:102.85.210.97]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 00000000000F5CEF.0000000064252ACD.00004EBD; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 23:23:08 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:18:14 +0300 From: Jean Louis To: 62482@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#62482: Acknowledgement (Unclear configure errors about "gl_PROG_CC_C99" and "gl_EARLY") Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.9+54 (af2080d) (2022-11-21) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) * GNU bug Tracking System [2023-03-27 17:35]: > Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. > If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please > send it to 62482@debbugs.gnu.org. I do not understand why am I receiving the confirmation of bug report I have not filed. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 03 06:38:00 2023 Received: (at 62482-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2023 10:38:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qckUQ-0000WQ-Fx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 06:38:00 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]:60883) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qckUN-0000W3-9n for 62482-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 06:37:57 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50087d47d4dso955211e87.1 for <62482-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:37:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693737459; x=1694342259; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MfWadz2Ui49OuwXHYr1vx/FOHCZDmbtJpvdhVQ30XaM=; b=WN1UrFhMkI9p4BwLUr9fvkAuP4NAU9zYeuMvrSB09SqxCPI84tUYiXJ14mdcXiNT4j mODG7ZLOwj6ScdYoJWwbFaOKxv5bP25pPCcvNlVgCJoJ17aMtuMOhNOCs6Dtz8jS8ySs nDhDNyu70Z2ItyAYbz0qhUJxYGuvNQFEnFRNOpJuWiNEVkIn/mLHAqfWwhblTrbRxXh0 6EvyGXcJgbCMjdzTHL18EV37LJtSZZ0kgT7+/G1D2mhAcXwsJ2xtmoy0XxTg9w1S2tyL TFy3eEXPI0xQvmNv6jikTXYipxPelbw6cMjzSRR33fBqhNTo+iKCDjsHaGncm6ufs2KR 2ZCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693737459; x=1694342259; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MfWadz2Ui49OuwXHYr1vx/FOHCZDmbtJpvdhVQ30XaM=; b=TV+Bxdrh7b9wctflhYXJni33BH5xrsSAdR3wj0I9DbcOZo6n3FAlcoxGFI8t5KNF9F ctS9vIpZPfQdTG7Dk+/46EoboP9nRUSBF/eoZKSYz1TRZa/vvZc0ocwjGp5OAwxf0W8D EoOuu7l0jRUOmwBWcS1rLr6aeMlQ27dOb2068LKoaxbza1cMqLfGQ0OZLlFVmCqcsMco dpshkNUIi5FJmelt/2Un/+mwJAkYlX/AlayyRG/dlQyULzkTNDIcUPwSKG2py+BkcWVT DWV6+6WnaD7N+XvDUFGWIRHSC7UPrSiF/3Kf+vJHuR1NqrXiTD90K3doXMOa+w6Adlei ixYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy7I+UYUsDq1t04DEmvr4Y2wGaHWbud8wwGqRESGEXGoAshprUO ZQ/YJ9ySt6EKLkqHumVnOe3Ikn/g+5iuuGJzKPs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH9y6H8fzUToXtjMQF/aaKAsj8HpKpxDinmy0YcSOSwOSoxnPLivG2S50dl4Fj5WOFyKmUUjMyNa2kV8LQ43DM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:39c6:b0:500:9de4:5968 with SMTP id k6-20020a05651239c600b005009de45968mr6346307lfu.59.1693737458998; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 03:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 03:37:38 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <835yam9u67.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:54:08 +0300") References: <835yam9u67.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 03:37:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#62482: Unclear configure errors about "gl_PROG_CC_C99" and "gl_EARLY" To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62482-done Cc: 62482-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > tags 62482 notabug > thanks [...] > > Please read INSTALL.REPO, which tells you to run ./autogen.sh script > instead. Then such errors ought not to happen. I'm therefore closing this bug report. From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:50:35 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:24:29 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator