GNU bug report logs - #6236
Bug report in Date Command

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: jaylee <at> huawei.com

Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 02:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 6236 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 6236 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org:
bug#6236; Package coreutils. (Fri, 21 May 2010 02:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to jaylee <at> huawei.com:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 21 May 2010 02:23:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: lijian 65631 <jaylee <at> huawei.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: Bug report in Date Command
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 10:07:49 +0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Dear David,

 

When I input the comman 'date "+%Y%m%d" -d "1986-05-04 1 day"' to get the
next day of '1986-05-04', I get the result as below.

Maybe it is a bug of Date command , Please help to find it, Thanks.



 

Regards,

 

 Lijian 65631
 Email:  <mailto:jaylee <at> huawei.com> jaylee <at> huawei.com
 Tel  : 13510271503  0755-28979991
 Dept : Consumer Service Development Dept, HS

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
HUAWEI, which 
is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any
use of the 
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to,
total or partial 
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
intended 
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender by 
phone or email immediately and delete it!

 

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[image002.jpg (image/jpeg, attachment)]

Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org:
bug#6236; Package coreutils. (Fri, 21 May 2010 14:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 6236 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: jaylee <at> huawei.com
Cc: 6236 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6236: Bug report in Date Command
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 08:28:13 -0600
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 05/20/2010 08:07 PM, lijian 65631 wrote:
> Dear David,

This is a mailing list frequented by lots of readers.  I'm not David,
but I can reply.

> 
> When I input the comman 'date "+%Y%m%d" -d "1986-05-04 1 day"' to get the
> next day of '1986-05-04', I get the result as below.
> 
> Maybe it is a bug of Date command , Please help to find it, Thanks.

Thanks for the report.  However, it is most likely the only bug here is
your understanding of how date operates around daylight savings events:
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#The-date-command-is-not-working-right_002e

> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from

It is considered poor netiquette to include employer disclaimers on mail
sent to publicly archived mailing lists, where the disclaimer is
rendered ineffective.  Consider using a personal account instead.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Reply sent to Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:38:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to jaylee <at> huawei.com:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 6236-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
To: jaylee <at> huawei.com, 6236-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6236: Bug report in Date Command
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:37:06 -0600
Eric Blake wrote:
> This is a mailing list frequented by lots of readers.  I'm not David,
> but I can reply.

By coincidence I am not David either.  But will respond too anyway. :-)

> lijian 65631 wrote:
> > When I input the comman 'date "+%Y%m%d" -d "1986-05-04 1 day"' to get the
> > next day of '1986-05-04', I get the result as below.
> > 
> > Maybe it is a bug of Date command , Please help to find it, Thanks.
> 
> Thanks for the report.  However, it is most likely the only bug here is
> your understanding of how date operates around daylight savings events:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/#The-date-command-is-not-working-right_002e

I am confident that this is related to daylight savings time and that
it is answered in the FAQ.  Not having seen any activity on this issue
for a while I am going to close it in the bug tracking system.  Please
feel free to follow up if it has not answered your questions and the
group will see and read your message and the bug tracker will keep
track of it for us.

Bob




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 15 years and 47 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.