Subject: bug#62333: 30.0.50; Issue with tree-sitter syntax tree during certain changes

From: Yuan Fu <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 12:31:58 -0700

I don’t think we should blindly widen in tree-sitter sexp functions, but not because of mmm-mode—tree-sitter ranges should have that mostly covered. My primary concern is that what if narrowing is intended by the caller?

But I don’t have any good idea for blink-matching right now.

Yuan