From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:18:55 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#62317 <62317@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#62317 <62317@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. Reply-To: bug#62317 <62317@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:18:55 +0000 retitle 62317 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. reassign 62317 emacs submitter 62317 Teika Kazura severity 62317 normal tag 62317 patch wontfix thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 20 23:57:33 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2023 03:57:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57324 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1peT7t-0001yp-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 23:57:33 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43502) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1peT7r-0001yh-9T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 23:57:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1peT7q-0003vY-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 23:57:30 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1peT7o-0003Ra-Is for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 23:57:30 -0400 Received: from localhost ([153.206.10.174]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M8ykW-1pbjq10uoQ-0066DE; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 04:57:23 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:54:08 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> Subject: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. From: Teika Kazura To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1QpQTikbDPNCsWIlJ5Zj6fMgfZt927vYo6/bII5cnvNbTJfNBl1 uErEsmXBVX8m1k1i+BZOR6i71qkQ0HHxy2wfFnqjYQUNu+bbn78aDCPSYrnjoMiObqLsCJe 8lcyuovh9Mlwbx1HADP3aDrZWyUBt9/CBBcQ0u18VeJDcNKDK1GWV48YyZiRys78AQQZI0M FvypZfiIk7ik7V4DOprsw== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:r/454RBoiR4=;/vxnG0bw73N3c7RC/flagAo3Qx4 f6L3sWiJTItXT4T6FTWW3Mpv6n3nc4EqzZFaWP+yp2M+DT5UMKzXrErxzajT7JsUyh/DkqyCM ToHy649w2Vy+lt+k24Sq7/DomRkW8DtA0kOMziNFNyWCaYBewETXxt+1Hm4S4/UTO3JHGTMWM 5vE2NXAUgI96/lOcNXYJczkPxAKe/hAEfvSkrYJDdEo/PEEa++aMnvXfEodv/GqrBUBJO7VDM +v8XOl0BpbOGg0h82VcsyWHsJKgsfC0PomiBMUFqrKJkm5A1GYFLe4C6J5HwtfFA2azb1bB1o wa+lrI/I4Lu7HrLyJgbLmHQ3vuKWJGX+EoNHf3bV4mob6zDY+rmIrGjqTyZss+smcWPMa1VLd sargn2ny1zKSZoygC27k9v5YnIyMF21/PwMvcfKdBLsxt2GZ2zPlGaUEPkDR6tOErIhEiVjkq c34qf/5OyWlzfMP0qIUQ+pjUb1jjXhCp5d/BYtgBUFFMlKIlB9wZMoEI7k2ijflydZchEhNzp qWju9QwWZIXyfEd4vS0rtm2fv2PHdLlfUu2a1tHJT7C13oZLFHL+yWDUMnv4oDQKmTzifgD5G SPU8vLqxcAt25lmIG6wQXhXMfhPZcB8E+UiwZbKP7K2+WtWVmX7VgYxRQvALTvBVRNaXUShxD NM9SWS99w0MPMeOBBKwnNoDxU3vg4Gql+DRvxyhjkFbmFX6P+NfyUPeFjUls1HxbI/y0dI1Th WLH/elKDcjFUJmOeZL/klzHqrt13rGnY27f9nnOpFY7sjTwEdl3ClQWc051Fbtp84FA8TLv2q SbCWBJtG7pl2VoNHB6cDZ7gsp/NHxmEMTu0VVUYOG40lXmqjWIlkcgMM7JUgdvsRBA0xdKnQc GZvPv/hfmJ3C2qeZ4FLKvlZKDEHtloh3jYoZeFdF6i0DUhIxdQFjNAnSw4sGt1p6pjdcXba7V wFhmLg== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=teika@gmx.com; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hi. In the situation below, a byte-compiled init code's evaluation is not completed, but emacs starts as if nothing was wrong. * How to reproduce: First, ~/.emacs.d/init.el: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (eval-and-compile (push user-emacs-directory load-path) (require 'a)) ;; Hereafter is ignored when byte-compiled. (defvar foo-var 'baz) (message "Hello, world.") (pop-to-buffer "*Messages*") ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ~/.emacs.d/a.el: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (set-buffer "*Messages*") ;; or (set-buffer (get-buffer-create "bar")) (provide 'a) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Byte compile these two files *in this order*: $ cd ~/.emacs.d; emacs -Q -batch -f batch-byte-compile a.el init.el (you can now remove a.elc; it doesn't matter this bug.) Finally, run emacs as either of these: $ emacs -Q -l init.elc $ emacs --no-splash --no-site-file * Symptom As I commented in init.el, the code after `require' is ignored when init.el is byte-compiled. However, emacs starts as if nothing was wrong. The line of `set-buffer' in a.el seems to trigger this bug. If you delete that line, this bug doesn't occur. * version and build info: In short, emacs 28 regression, but I don't know the exact version - My 28.1 was without gcc-jit, and this bug was not there. The 28.2 is built with gcc-jit, and the bug hits me. Full build info: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gentoo Linux GNU Emacs 28.2 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.34, cairo version 1.16.0) of 2023-02-02 Configured using: 'configure --prefix=/usr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --datarootdir=/usr/share --disable-silent-rules --docdir=/usr/share/doc/emacs-28.2-r4 --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/emacs-28.2-r4/html --libdir=/usr/lib64 --program-suffix=-emacs-28 --includedir=/usr/include/emacs-28 --infodir=/usr/share/info/emacs-28 --localstatedir=/var --enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp --without-compress-install --without-hesiod --without-pop --with-file-notification=inotify --with-pdumper --enable-acl --without-dbus --with-modules --without-gameuser --with-libgmp --without-gpm --with-native-compilation --with-json --without-kerberos --without-kerberos5 --without-lcms2 --with-xml2 --without-mailutils --without-selinux --with-gnutls --without-libsystemd --with-threads --with-wide-int --with-sound=no --with-zlib --with-x --without-ns --without-gconf --with-gsettings --without-toolkit-scroll-bars --without-gif --without-jpeg --without-png --without-rsvg --without-tiff --without-xpm --without-imagemagick --with-xft --with-cairo --with-harfbuzz --with-libotf --with-m17n-flt --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --without-xwidgets --with-dumping=pdumper 'CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed'' Configured features: ACL CAIRO FREETYPE GLIB GMP GNUTLS GSETTINGS HARFBUZZ JSON LIBOTF LIBXML2 M17N_FLT MODULES NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER SECCOMP THREADS X11 XDBE XIM GTK3 ZLIB ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks, Emacs developers. Best regards, Teika From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 22 02:39:27 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2023 06:39:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33294 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pes87-0002MT-2J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 02:39:27 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:45755) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pes82-0002MD-Tu for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 02:39:25 -0400 Received: from localhost ([153.204.207.140]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N3KTy-1qdoRt3BWE-010KIg; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 07:39:16 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:39:04 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20230322.153904.489906822658174776.teika@gmx.com> To: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. From: Teika Kazura Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Gw/Qo3AyuOH3Z+JYxfzTZsWg2jCfCLpGh5d1U5IK3T0uiwBAFWF PDXc0RoaDUThCGnZUv6rQkzmq5jBH5FEIeb/+U0NrsYJgE5RsLZQdPZq8wkiivKwIvBAdsJ E6BUwTGfpA7g88CRROg44KLxWYj/qu7Y8CAVhQwFlTavq6dXcGlAY5x456U1qx+L98RIjvs rjyZTSE9LrDp5+7qgtL/Q== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:KpkMqNyDh/4=;ixIbrG2ejVhpk4WL63QlZsWjviK +wQ4863qra2v5+nr7fVVLw9Hy1YpwL0AMUgf0QEkvXis7XxuVjs7fCgFHGRNzWRWyINqmYFP+ Dng+fAARAGC3tHDRcig+cA24A6nFUwBazB3OyfeoJIejBqTnioyddnwRfbuRKHOSUhnDiF4BB kskG1BJ/jAdSzGKm6qhuHkTSnfVmOrPBB/4EIAv7xEplgQzJiQmbrtQQWZvkRweMpH8FstV/U Dgy4be4uylrZkkeYvP5RIRXxxQ8cPPEGT013CEsGkxOeWWToo0qK3RU1fCrLk+uCH3YUkVMgA WOkCCUtH/VTptKmSmpkt0LHkiebI/10am2BpBm0ieTi0UNwbylC0NLsHwvoRkX+GOskR8R730 TVTI/M2eBW6/fxfHZscUSDCv5IwRf0LtHoiABHNAyb3kbNZZft2XNoX/T7LhmKL7JoTLB3Pqc wTutpVgyig33b9zwHhQkeXXfEZA6cppB7NGNGXtYrYHQoHQzWyvaIn8FaW5QoxbhBSCd0LTCn Wr4fPr7VsYyVh4ipAEURF48GQObNtxiRmI9349QqvlSa9SsypclrCC+IVfBh6GgY2A/9f9dL8 izvop1rGm8pyhFIjyZERCJbnWwSsGPx2y1hX7qL/3EhUSJls/nAWRmKAxY4AYbdhS5NFHDp4Y yhUCRDriU6dcaYFnZdiTFtTQ0oPlTXgy+8Qdbw9CkL9jkFqJPZRFbTAuEPAxpT9X4pGrlLV/D EHGcMdmYYwGCyFUdBrCrXLHsUMLQbWn4V3LjIgIBRQotQg9z2qpYhFiana9AtdERKDDJTxiFE RrgAQ7nCp8JdIG+g84JkV9LteB7u3WatxP3hwnruAkUKkjZbIHWJ8HojK4bKWtpdrInie2sEJ TmLZvvxrWlTif2KfqeTewAxrHQ+YQmUz1L/Dq+oUvDcEF7lqZjYvIE+VC5OFazIRdO7xTmqF3 iwbxrV3+SYzOOYS8ph5+iaYGjJw= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) As a workaround, you can wrap `set-buffer' with save-excursion, with-current-buffer, or save-current-buffer. Then it works correctly. Teika From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 28 05:16:06 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2023 09:16:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph5Qz-0008IA-Vz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 05:16:06 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:48479) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph5Qx-0008HY-84 for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 05:16:04 -0400 Received: from localhost ([180.11.39.2]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MNswE-1q5LRz2tIm-00OETn; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 11:15:57 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:15:44 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20230328.181544.1322854406210586127.teika@gmx.com> To: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. From: Teika Kazura Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:5aftmfFNH1GYhqGvAf36x6yLkcuGwR6aVZhV6eDH8LYEPH0Coqe OYFFGJqEx0GJPO/26NLrN0crGkblFLgQIoTnpuVTJ5l3OLP0fdzXHYKat84Iy2oMOKj+nkR IDwSPZFIgCKvpulTfWSgfuR9nbL12Ln7b37Y2iJWT1pSSY/bQUNReNQuVMNkM6GIWUBdQt3 jhI7TpCx91PJPvAlfReAA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:jfwkVpni19s=;jm3utFYOS0zYbwgGhA8qm9QwCj8 OQMs6vNaA3klJNVD/KoQ1DEon/ptYYxfsW3p6QLivAzURN+/9WnnArAEMtgXvQnULe5dfWeut DQfR1JVVgZFruAnnWVhD3IfzsNPe1xb/g2rpSXvmxJ9wue46M0YzeOkVViG55y82nEwXeybIT OvDp2Z9yUJRutOS2y8beUZ6aSXWcWK9msK5py7G33hg8dtVjeyVenU5zrJIG59AiKp8Idydj1 Ul6MUeSsbqeO7q8b+vYAuy730ZPMjlEbKnDrpL0lfp5hnvmE85Ut+Ck9tHX6C6V4Lqp2pgl1R CSd7Q03o/kzw8pzXvIpputSeK96oNM7gpzN+V8G8dHQsP8smQWOPlCkkpXBITtKB89gRQ8bAh FIUP44a3oy0LbCMbRj8Y3epdihcZ2+g36DOS8QMhBGp4TJWKKEvu6OVx4s/c15z6+rC4T17Iq wGWXximE1u6+kRG5yaXvz7vTvHOxUHMkGHM+8CaxvNw6GjprTDhBjNkmogxvCOCNEryLVGdZG kueVCWcyomlizr+O9zHE0GZENmnywgMIfuQVfBQZrQTQsb9eVDpx9zD8jjuv5/RtrGMDN6rDB IGHXJJxJwqyLJYxqDneEgFH2vPNAC7o7AlYSkZH1wM3RbAQCNiKdu9n1c6FUy8YgyoaJupACl tUS5OvY2E3uempanr1ZY5VzZa/1vENzBwKBCHGDz2lxqbwXY1VZlSUsPkZu6CTPFLtoozBuw7 v7w99+jPkSKivF+THl41l0SlWopbk4JCigkWCDdyEG+Y1oxauNv0ZuCIo2g626eSH61xZgCTW SKnNzkMf5jyOMlT8gEZd0oIP+nQ0zKk3mmcfh+j1H5HTHeiQok1UZbjo/QhO7aZnvTWyN1ION 6WDXsDXYvS1n3JTb0BMwJkVQC+Zp9FKeD2SnfgQVXyrRtqhBDgoOywpL07hIY5hi32J8i/X3J VXpp8w== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) This bug is also related to native-compilation, but I can't demonstrate it in a simple way. The situation for the init.el that I really use is: * I suspect that the pair of require - set-buffer causes the bug. At least, the above workaround works, wrapping set-buffer. * There the existence of init.elc does not matter. Instead, the init-.eln is the problem. By removing it, the bug disappears. * But each time I run emacs, an eln is automatically generated aynchronously if it's lacking. (I can't find what causes automatic native compilation.) Anyway fixing this bug will solve other native-compilation related bugs, if any. Regards, Teika From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 28 08:08:20 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2023 12:08:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph87f-00070g-RT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:08:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph87e-00070U-27 for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:08:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ph87Y-0001Eg-DW; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:08:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=zZqcg9SJeUZ0g7zbOsaCYOiq6fYCM4j/LBDOYDLOcv8=; b=R8qjpgvCIBYv QUE8hNj5hnZqS8Z9DUNxrhVtG4BaLacmGWBa8eACRaQeiF8nwWlOEVPeZV/ftn2t1JNOXt9wsAaBj O7t6o3yD88/BL7gNW7qoIh0Bv3E/OZQonyeo20FhUvWOKdrkkpvkG6GztGKa0wNmG+WxJ65ff9q8Y udQf3sWxO5BrzYbsrMI/zDm42QEz6lCiqx1zwGI3sklsY2aivXklCJ6m4kVokVFLlz9ZBtmqEVrFo VAH1J1EMyNm+XDjsfswOa0vkeQIEoD0B/tAJCgO9eSxh/d7j428flPbSTvtFryukjcnnaBQfXLeCx /9LZIKu8KlOZnl3X0R1MlA==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ph87X-0004tU-NP; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:08:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:08:16 +0300 Message-Id: <83a5zx84en.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Teika Kazura , Andrea Corallo In-Reply-To: <20230328.181544.1322854406210586127.teika@gmx.com> (message from Teika Kazura on Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:15:44 +0900 (JST)) Subject: Re: bug#62317: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <20230328.181544.1322854406210586127.teika@gmx.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:15:44 +0900 (JST) > From: Teika Kazura > > This bug is also related to native-compilation, but I can't demonstrate it in a simple way. > > The situation for the init.el that I really use is: > * I suspect that the pair of require - set-buffer causes the bug. At least, the above workaround works, wrapping set-buffer. > * There the existence of init.elc does not matter. Instead, the init-.eln is the problem. By removing it, the bug disappears. > * But each time I run emacs, an eln is automatically generated aynchronously if it's lacking. (I can't find what causes automatic native compilation.) Native compilation is always triggered when Emacs loads a .elc file for which there is no corresponding .eln. > Anyway fixing this bug will solve other native-compilation related bugs, if any. CC'ing Andrea. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 28 08:43:37 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2023 12:43:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph8fp-0007uy-0r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:43:37 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:64310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph8fn-0007uq-FI for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:43:36 -0400 Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.16.1/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 32SChWaE008428 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:43:33 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#62317: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. In-Reply-To: <83a5zx84en.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:08:16 +0300") References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <20230328.181544.1322854406210586127.teika@gmx.com> <83a5zx84en.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:43:33 +0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, Teika Kazura X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:15:44 +0900 (JST) >> From: Teika Kazura >> >> This bug is also related to native-compilation, but I can't demonstrate it in a simple way. >> >> The situation for the init.el that I really use is: >> * I suspect that the pair of require - set-buffer causes the bug. At least, the above workaround works, wrapping set-buffer. >> * There the existence of init.elc does not matter. Instead, the init-.eln is the problem. By removing it, the bug disappears. >> * But each time I run emacs, an eln is automatically generated aynchronously if it's lacking. (I can't find what causes automatic native compilation.) > > Native compilation is always triggered when Emacs loads a .elc file > for which there is no corresponding .eln. > >> Anyway fixing this bug will solve other native-compilation related bugs, if any. > > CC'ing Andrea. Yes, I guess it's all caused by 263d6c38539691c954f4c3057cbe8d5468499b91. I'm in a business trip now but I want to fix it ASAP (within the week), I already started to look into it. Anyway if we feel this is causing too much disruption I'm happy to revert the offending commit now WDYT? Thanks Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 28 08:53:17 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2023 12:53:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph8pB-0008DJ-3g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:53:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph8p9-0008D7-Hy for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:53:16 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ph8p3-0008WG-Ao; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:53:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=7towsuR490xVrMK/eyo8pqwLVX2xLOm6MPyeszPKh0s=; b=pp61wHyFrIvM YkvyJ0KprBc1Oxk5YJw1bwGuCj9ZsM3oEy5wL4CmmA+7Ii0Azx+pezLvKuX3IUL+c1/B/FphE7Ys8 zfjO39UyXPB69dE+PQknmFbD2gP3PE+IItv4Fd5n9JB9wJjNkN5isyBeDtZYt0nssJwF8a3V/xBZH n7B6skE31juIoojstgnSylDEM8JkkFsssFtBQ9htFFPeZnLWeucoc6Eeq0mYG8v8C/zPInOQkkbuC DB0MMDisq+98PQ82HUENWMIK/AZV6sEXAu/1f+/Z/bcXSevI9R2ZZOyeFOWYCcHHCli8dXBtLk9qf 8DtZAVoJEgfSn3Skrc29ZA==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ph8oz-0003rC-QY; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:53:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:53:10 +0300 Message-Id: <834jq582bt.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrea Corallo In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:43:33 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#62317: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <20230328.181544.1322854406210586127.teika@gmx.com> <83a5zx84en.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: Teika Kazura , 62317@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:43:33 +0000 > > Anyway if we feel this is causing too much disruption I'm happy to > revert the offending commit now WDYT? Yes, maybe we should revert until the solution is found. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 28 09:49:12 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2023 13:49:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph9hH-0001DN-Qq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:49:12 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:51899) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ph9hF-0001DE-QL for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:49:10 -0400 Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.16.1/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 32SDn1q9015284 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:49:07 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#62317: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. In-Reply-To: <834jq582bt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:53:10 +0300") References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <20230328.181544.1322854406210586127.teika@gmx.com> <83a5zx84en.fsf@gnu.org> <834jq582bt.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:49:01 +0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: Teika Kazura , 62317@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 12:43:33 +0000 >> >> Anyway if we feel this is causing too much disruption I'm happy to >> revert the offending commit now WDYT? > > Yes, maybe we should revert until the solution is found. I agree. I reverted now the patch series into 29. Thanks Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 30 05:21:22 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2023 09:21:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phoTC-0003VU-5G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:21:22 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:36719) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phoTA-0003VG-MP for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:21:21 -0400 Received: from localhost ([153.204.206.72]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MkHMP-1qAJjU23qL-00kfhP; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:21:14 +0200 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:20:45 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20230330.182045.1482877200410669261.teika@gmx.com> To: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. From: Teika Kazura In-Reply-To: <20230330.181859.275167795410318945.teika@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7PgzGlf3HLVg7K13oNFT3JWuO1RPm8Fj3ITVepz6QNd8zBlKWxV 3+5zrULrnlr2+s+eisuTHbYxYhtUptFNOZCOTzdUoFhKPFeB683BXRf+F0A+cJRvw3DeYfx +N5CIsQUI0J1+gg2Hh8GlsGgmFf49knnBdid7g7S/PNbPmbKVNikPtfta5LrE9LpWDKAgME UMx++0RF/FGbGHHpPjxyQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:CtPNDy2IYkM=;K6SmL4hr66J2HQmOb+w1Vnb1d43 wbhM+8JMzi/5+J/EWHaFE04u2YEAR6HXaiYwxCyQQVk8jITb36K2KFyKlkZPH5pilBzMe18RH WfRaN0OgCLXYkKvjxPtSWhZnsrpyLY6FuEkqMDKr9H+tlgj6KroDMSUBG8bdWSJXgdUEbkYLy QUUR1HCOyTkQww7MgEWwXHHhE3vB3Razxu70Upf+k4FsXgqTiuH4RTx2149Jt4z3HAQa0LPhz GJSLe725F9YZ/LXkf8DtIsMJgdqAI0Q1T6+UqK28pU4Qxmc2Ke85SLmLLx/izhTzNf4TSRSMD MOcD6Au0wihwubDCEuJ79fpRcU/JaVFRcuWmMm0HPIe454oAkYy3hcKTF20t+mdS+1thSsrxu NCT8IMk1nenkSUVTBxoECds0NyM95J2uPNzAzcZykuY4O/ZjtVbTfu3j0KgVy/Bm4MyMI8kYo 5b81OUqAyqPlWH3ZPw3nipMzIDYg/PQwBwfjlB/nH/Je8IM9Y83O+klw/xpiWXFGAuQewZFqZ qBi9mZuQ04l8EP+zSnXCHd4I7sewqNtHchEtokkpAwih2ST7rg48x5V30igcjGYoujbio936n sZDbqoye9g5qQ1yt9X7rgpoi86WY/m3zbObdlxzHTs164hmQ/w2xip8RKE+7TFoI36GvGU4l5 JI4psRaprrnSichFHgc1pF+7Fr/As1ghfmHRO8azsa3kH9cRI/TzyFywy4D7D5fU5s0GgieR7 tM0lIchrHneD/TcfgH3dZgTEt+P87CK1QteCep23J1NY+5xbKzlP8D0ChQF0nTaEzHXzwUEpd 5tM7vAaO/IMXGrKhOS68Nj5e+jSjuSkQ4pelasBHi8rRPqFRogqXm9+9GPnIjBPq1vvXR6Nbd EsTtUwo3eKT5brTlzN3GM79jeOCP4N/GZiA/cJUIC3x7L9cGbUUETMfrmcM5Jt4O3e85Y9M0O FaiLqQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi. I found a relation of this bug to native compilation, but there's a new, independent bug. Anyway remember the problem here is the pair of require - set-buffer, and I'm using 28.2. (I know it's not safe. :p) What surprises is that `native-compile-async' and `batch-native-compile' generate differnt codes. To show it, use the same init.el and a.el above. Byte-compile first a.el, then init.el. Next native-compile init.el. Run emacs, and the above bug appears. The difference is that (i) if you use native-compile-async, by removing one of init-.eln or init.elc, the bug disappears, even if the other remains. But (ii) if you use "$ emacs -Q -batch -f batch-native-compile *el", eln in fact does not matter; only the presence of init.elc screws things up. # Who can expect this? At the very least, native-compilation has too many undocumented aspects. If you want, I'll open a new bug for this discrepancy. # It's off-topic for this bug, but for the above sample code, automatic, asynchronous generation of an eln file does not happen, unlike the case of my real init.el. I can't find the reason yet. Regards, Teika From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 30 05:41:17 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2023 09:41:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phomT-00042J-4r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:41:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55772) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1phomR-000426-Vd for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:41:16 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phomL-0003Hb-FJ; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:41:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=QiAKZO5F7fVCtXfsmEJFdtRlRDhR9FKfDTTBOR03gPc=; b=MKT2Zgo5wh5K bmC6gG8pLMxXvoCeiM76IJFE9XSDeao+3WJx4dsgcquutcwVR99ttTaiAE92EjXTCFk19bCtu1zSq UYrD7Q5Rnhq9FtDx6emAW4PsTsMbPXKd+/0/wYj9RkFF2xQnZYBSM48IPZBPhf681ZCD6o5rVQ2op /nNCo2HdL/3Dag4xzSqcGaRBakJR33/I1VDO6Ldlzof7DOgIIvJr7aYdsz/ZgCVLXfknMJZDOqLSm Z5tYA5zlsxMYOpk4t2xl8c7YRcIOzt5+HwvVLSe9e3k/200iSS3CtAn1afR12b5WHlo4AiHiRpvFD 9C/tgUqh1XDxShGlbXmCeg==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1phomK-0001vN-OS; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 05:41:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:41:18 +0300 Message-Id: <83edp660g1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Teika Kazura In-Reply-To: <20230330.182045.1482877200410669261.teika@gmx.com> (message from Teika Kazura on Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:20:45 +0900 (JST)) Subject: Re: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. References: <20230330.182045.1482877200410669261.teika@gmx.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:20:45 +0900 (JST) > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org > From: Teika Kazura > > What surprises is that `native-compile-async' and `batch-native-compile' generate differnt codes. To show it, use the same init.el and a.el above. Byte-compile first a.el, then init.el. Next native-compile init.el. Run emacs, and the above bug appears. This is not surprising at all: native-compile-async compiles in a separate process with environment unaffected by your customizations, whereas batch-native-compile compiles in the current session, and thus inherits all of your customizations. > The difference is that (i) if you use native-compile-async, by removing one of init-.eln or init.elc, the bug disappears, even if the other remains. But (ii) if you use "$ emacs -Q -batch -f batch-native-compile *el", eln in fact does not matter; only the presence of init.elc screws things up. > > # Who can expect this? > > At the very least, native-compilation has too many undocumented aspects. If you want, I'll open a new bug for this discrepancy. > > # It's off-topic for this bug, but for the above sample code, automatic, asynchronous generation of an eln file does not happen, unlike the case of my real init.el. I can't find the reason yet. If the above happens in "emacs -Q", a reproducible recipe will help. And please try that in Emacs 29 if you can, since we don't plan on any releases of Emacs 28 with any substantial changes. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 01 03:38:12 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2023 07:38:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35351 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piVoR-0002Uc-T6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 03:38:12 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:39143) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piVoQ-0002UP-Ti for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 03:38:11 -0400 Received: from localhost ([180.11.45.178]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MOzOm-1q5Vln3MXU-00PPuL; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 09:38:04 +0200 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 16:36:49 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20230401.163649.1533008264124348958.teika@gmx.com> To: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. From: Teika Kazura Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:F59WBF9jV9cvUZDN/rvL1EPVEnOjapkxUZhw3BE2i8uEs0/K4Dg N0T00M5FDpzPFsd4HwdZrV/O5zi6GH9EkNVIK0xW+ywsSykqjuxob3mJmDT7HlYPbG42bIn dwJqyUzmaK7wfX0RLAU21ybwqk4ZAsX8iuP5nye5AYmQrPdy/dRgckbvyZU6glrQtLB0FMa /SipFNZ50L0Qg67REE19w== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:YitNPG8F0IE=;WrClh2MjPUlCG0N8/xqpYBIXI8v SbeLPh5h2TPKJLA30T/kDNeueG6qUF+hSI/e18CXzjdCmmVHYpknYJcKYNiu58ZleGSCbrqNW Q6wRz0WfW99GPUuFFfHtu4mB0rju3oXFaTAY+6i7jG9hM1T/PYxiLilhQp3WmaQ95xq71fVov WtKcaj/y/yGvvKVJ2G1p3F+pvm/ALvU9Z1cKVNV4AWsSyAnIM18ij1S5WNzCsUre5fb2JrZll HlrYrJ1RKbiDRoeA1WUZUSteU53UtuzzGUgNbMMFNmlZRxV6jBmr5cqXQDoYzH20cIR9UjUFN TGonX++3n90ALmMNJtuPem9sk0CtzaPpLpItUuH6nep/dzlbnTp2laOkf4cVGNm7meyCHgALg DFxT5DskysQWRhVwsvcMYYa5Ou+Ih23/eXTAHeHAzIwBdUIJAl+XsmvVJjf2E/wUw+cRlr+jh Ozdj+tLF+/hBeI5prMY0oSHpjrF1JAbPNd/lG8Oava/8yZeYQiadON6IPnrB/cBvscTvncSD7 cI1pWdM/Tv5rhdz4O/f5WgzpitB9mWbbJFnhawSfxxHGRW3EBf5454P3MS+edZdQzLTdYkdP5 /Xq6Gd5sRBg43F0o3E5rAZNFswo6EAb+b0fwLXIrUImFX/LS2WeMZ/ovq+w+6hmSPjmIxkKZn Jl8Ixmd9NksDFcTza+lNemj5m3zBQgLoxZKVM/Sj/OZO1n54JK/aWfWIIiujU0VM2F0XHNau0 b8Kf2pKxEQn1Rribox6EZWhXHh8fFnxszveM1l2/+QwGwbU+BtOb70oJvSGE2eV7bVzFXwvvx pPdQvdHP72WrOaesI5ousK6LNqPOCASinAWD+G1JLgNN7wfUdPdPCcmGBG0ykYwOXAvn0zsZl 3v/EECytE5RsnAUcio83uqwiVoDa9FG2HEd6zIAA8vKrDElrAqFlqvzfh7FgWnS+aHOMs/DmP UA2+pg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Sorry for having messed, but native compilation is a separate issue which is to be discussed elsewhere. The original bug exists for the 29 git head, and for 28.3. [1] It's a pure byte-compilation problem, and the reproduction procedure in Message #5 remains valid. The workaround above works also for 29. [1] For the 29, I used d0eb12e8d3c9d6f95b8493e05857d583c29dd0fe (2023-03-31) and "28.3" is actually 28.2 + three vulnerebility fixes by my distro, Gentoo Linux. Both are built *without* libgcc, i.e. with --without-native-compilation. For the native compilation issue, sorry, I can't help. It's difficult for me to recompile repeatedly with --with-native-compilation. (Building 29 took about 3 times longer than 28.) Thank you, Teika From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 01 04:08:07 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2023 08:08:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piWHO-0003Zd-Vp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 04:08:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piWHM-0003Z2-Q4 for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 04:08:05 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piWHG-0003HR-Oz; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 04:07:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=PYavGwApXUJG9VcSiZ35T9dDxpplIoildcfkKBC2oEw=; b=BrKa/NpFsEJL PAD1rJ4iY7GzdDiRGVl4WbnzPrMxcA+N/3Xq0aJ9DqPMkwZtzVxnO7KkhnCLWeRcsZI+tLYCGrfz6 zL2u31fnwihjmVCEJ0xQTAE69USxPWrkwyjy3zP90MHAJ+vwdJ6TEjhcEmGLYQ3+4/aqh2QAhFauF Svc27J9KhP5g0k59oP3oQoYbKCl79Kg7FbYKYhFy62KeyFMfVEpOZ9ThobhRVXLJyD2ngGN1dZM1N cDJl5xm2NkbdgA2nFNEnj4I0kLwcngia0kzv2JTLBGEzagzEp+9PZ5anpe7XvRRSkJjJEqfQgVU/Q xNrevzz1jgLlmz3vxCoK7w==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piWHF-00076V-TX; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 04:07:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 11:08:14 +0300 Message-Id: <83o7o8yqhd.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Teika Kazura , Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <20230401.163649.1533008264124348958.teika@gmx.com> (message from Teika Kazura on Sat, 01 Apr 2023 16:36:49 +0900 (JST)) Subject: Re: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. References: <20230401.163649.1533008264124348958.teika@gmx.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 16:36:49 +0900 (JST) > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org > From: Teika Kazura > > Sorry for having messed, but native compilation is a separate issue which is to be discussed elsewhere. > > The original bug exists for the 29 git head, and for 28.3. [1] It's a pure byte-compilation problem, and the reproduction procedure in Message #5 remains valid. The workaround above works also for 29. > > [1] For the 29, I used d0eb12e8d3c9d6f95b8493e05857d583c29dd0fe (2023-03-31) and "28.3" is actually 28.2 + three vulnerebility fixes by my distro, Gentoo Linux. Both are built *without* libgcc, i.e. with --without-native-compilation. > > For the native compilation issue, sorry, I can't help. It's difficult for me to recompile repeatedly with --with-native-compilation. (Building 29 took about 3 times longer than 28.) Stefan, any ideas? I think switching to a different buffer inside eval-and-compile is a bad idea, but maybe I'm missing something. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 01 12:27:46 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2023 16:27:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38459 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pie4w-0007Sp-4a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:27:46 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:29728) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pie4t-0007Sa-QE for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:27:44 -0400 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 437E81000E6; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 12:27:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 092281000BD; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 12:27:37 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1680366457; bh=843Ika6wMNSkW4L+SxlHQHUtaHiIHbHozfFUbc55QSk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UNzEFytK645lgsYjgXWKYKAH+Sb9pah8zIUqWSh+8GOT0uLs9CkBRSQXuC/bqUf1z op6BIeYgXSfb2eWZM+TRre+oUO0ID50Vs7cPmDpMn5/QK4zihM5ZIWHIMxmX/XbFYz 8CTKVgGin32GAyIb1VpCMN1Of8Bj7qKWxckYpvs7n+DkBWAac8ULsyW/WyD7BE9/kW +To+bf6Tn0CYxbq+WyF3kATbD6QBJjZzIJjWy4u+ZrnWvEMt98VVhqA1rZ7QfcVh0J pLF+M/i2nYJYfSzff0zFIn83tJC3P6mxTKKJIpgH9tZsQy8MzXlf5pnKXQcrLtZaXc kaZR1xqDJ39sg== Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.217.176]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7A4F12326D; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 12:27:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Teika Kazura Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. In-Reply-To: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> (Teika Kazura's message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:54:08 +0900 (JST)") Message-ID: References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:27:35 -0400 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.663 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Email that uses ascii formatting dividers and possible spam tricks X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > * How to reproduce: > First, ~/.emacs.d/init.el: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > (eval-and-compile > (push user-emacs-directory load-path) > (require 'a)) > > ;; Hereafter is ignored when byte-compiled. > > (defvar foo-var 'baz) > (message "Hello, world.") > (pop-to-buffer "*Messages*") > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ~/.emacs.d/a.el: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > (set-buffer "*Messages*") ;; or (set-buffer (get-buffer-create "bar")) > (provide 'a) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I suspect you can simplify the above to: (eval-and-compile (set-buffer "*Messages*")) ;; Hereafter is ignored when byte-compiled. (message "Hello, world.") > Stefan, any ideas? I think switching to a different buffer inside > `eval-and-compile` is a bad idea, but maybe I'm missing something. I tend to agree. [ Side note: (push user-emacs-directory load-path) is also a bad idea. ] We could guard against this to some extent, but there will always be ways for the code executed at compile-time to mess up the state of the compiler, so I'm not sure where we should draw the line. FWIW, in my book `set-buffer` is a code smell (usually better replaced by `with-current-buffer`). Admittedly, the resulting behavior can be very puzzling&frustrating for the user, which would tend to argue in favor of trying to at least detect the problem. But note that if the code switched to a buffer where point is not at EOB, we'd probably get helpful error messages during compilation, so I'm leaning towards considering it a "minor corner case" issue, but I think the untested patch below would be enough to plug the hole. Stefan diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el index 5df1205869c..e22ab94e378 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el @@ -2376,7 +2376,10 @@ byte-compile-from-buffer (form (read-positioning-symbols inbuffer)) (warning (byte-run--unescaped-character-literals-warning))) (when warning (byte-compile-warn-x form "%s" warning)) - (byte-compile-toplevel-file-form form))) + ;; Defend against macros using `set-buffer' or `goto-char' + ;; bug#62317. + (save-excursion + (byte-compile-toplevel-file-form form)))) ;; Compile pending forms at end of file. (byte-compile-flush-pending) (byte-compile-warn-about-unresolved-functions))) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 01 13:10:35 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2023 17:10:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piekN-0000Me-KS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 13:10:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piekL-0000MQ-A9 for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 13:10:33 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piekF-0002lM-U8; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 13:10:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=nnH2vQyN2gvx07OHI2eb8XRhJuGkpkMyp8mqpGvH7fM=; b=Kmi+/4SAxqfw lcSoZJsoc8Cq2IHCfatqqmIzTcPuQuSbs3pcxk/hqQS1rzExo/7FqC3QXYqm4ZKk8VBLUa42UnBfy P27VW02lENS5beNwzsHVisqpJBTtnKhBxEetygJMBn49QIFSie3CflVDFxAOk+RAowz1WalWJpPjo 3WtSmezKrvxIMOn5IkmYmzMReIsexcIoNvJ2F35eWAdnvpIK5PrzzINmE4tb4oM/Dg5QZZEg+JEDw OARrtLnTO127XvuRqdLLFc52kJpDgkMPeW3WNcOla1xVP3yI1HzsEaEsyCQw5EiEFhQ0Vp6cP59UZ eCr7iU96zPTKyF73U+QNSg==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piekE-0001jf-9X; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 13:10:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 20:10:42 +0300 Message-Id: <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:27:35 -0400 > From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > I think the untested patch below would be enough to plug the hole. LGTM, thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 01 19:09:51 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2023 23:09:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pikM3-0004gV-DJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:09:51 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:4327) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pikM2-0004gH-8m for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:09:50 -0400 Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A175D4410D9; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 19:09:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6795D4410CC; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 19:09:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1680390583; bh=XW14xmYUfRWp72gbmtKmqqnc+M+TP5JkPQYgSe0gGxM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=g35dXSdsuGIkobRpBSRWUyoc4vz+rqGQTebXHBqQ9n/UdYCxW4H7keQYjZN3r9zQM hTpIIOKq5fhE4cXWB32hXOXMjlnpoNi0k1SFTBXr9gNX9UxZ4xdIDskxooJIncB1Tb /6ve+Cutsh6dnfVCs++ggwYgWjrRkDyVX2dOCU/WpvmO7uHXPveHxDBBEyx4CIzUqK y3Pydar48KJNIK9CaeBsQFkpk4aSJWfvQLwwg9IgDtrt9ehmhzR6nVQ3uFLU2HJbHn U9CB8e0anDD1lMG6dIoxssHdiUVZpbaffIL8KMhjAxdgfLFz8SjL6LNDSm/+91IO9T cRPy9sIT+RSvw== Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.217.176]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4114E123359; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 19:09:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. In-Reply-To: <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 01 Apr 2023 20:10:42 +0300") Message-ID: References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:09:42 -0400 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) >> I think the untested patch below would be enough to plug the hole. > LGTM, thanks. You're thinking of it for `emacs-29`, right? Then I had better test it before I push it :-) Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 01 19:15:48 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2023 23:15:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38713 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pikRo-0006y4-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:15:48 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:53709) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pikRm-0006j7-9g for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:15:46 -0400 Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0486880567; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 19:15:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5EF5280355; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 19:15:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1680390935; bh=mHY+cBgcHoGPqmU5JA/Jl5XUDF5QWkXxJDLuKIRTCrc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=A04CQvuti6TBOVMAErSTob39mH6tWU9PKrp/cuckH8Y0Qo+0Lr2yCQ3EOOFU673qr 9r6hzoALnjwD1pfqECWv6/NZ2vO+O783N0JCGGhuAoQ4yOzvugOustPwIlJXNX9CmN KDLwBu0jt5+v2EihohwM+kAecWpyp8J/D5NdlfimpND3LZSEEL48Td5AIhxHKyICb7 FmBkj3kQIvmYF739FUmhKZ/g3i/z6e4KMiPW2HblAMt9MX2vffl5kis4jZyIi1aY8i 0wPD8iRnLUC8Du7r+NvwqyL5o72fGpmB6qhUaZCJ5MqXNflxgScPOYhljwS4JjPo9K YwLlIQtxGzE7g== Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.217.176]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23039123335; Sat, 1 Apr 2023 19:15:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Teika Kazura Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:27:35 -0400") Message-ID: References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:15:33 -0400 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.429 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) H Teika, > I think the untested patch below would be enough to plug the hole. Could you test that patch to make sure it fixes the problem for you? You'll need to first apply the patch, then recompile the `bytecomp.el` file, and only after that re-try compiling the init file(s) where you saw the problem. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 02 01:17:13 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2023 05:17:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38974 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piq5Z-0000Y1-4c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2023 01:17:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54806) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piq5X-0000Xo-QR for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2023 01:17:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piq5S-00005Z-JS; Sun, 02 Apr 2023 01:17:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Q/BTxnaiq5TzvhqzFdD+huaKT1y2Vz76+ClTJK//0ZA=; b=b5wl8EMJnQ0X R4OIIva0RGk9T4dBCSJhXyUmOLtRvd2ezwCrnkAvt3zCZPswQyki1Q3QJ4kSROwvEwAHvUdnKFom9 5BFxJMZRgigi4bd0hdHTeJmZ5yKRoDfdU7cS7+RBhb8iW9BAlV0BS8BPZxw6IJcp3TR40m99YA/nZ g/vdYyd502B8iWh2SDT8DDWDMjT+tZI/p6bKHQmGFIZ5MA7H+L3r7VDpdpQVU4K1zpLqvJ6KeexFd CdaLV26eBuRNBye8SKSOYpGbpGoTh0P43nOL5QEAx0ki0+YBGT0IZXvc/xEnK1/65dLZgyrf5hlIv w47fR4wmbgpG4oFFUeTpuA==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piq5R-0001SC-EW; Sun, 02 Apr 2023 01:17:05 -0400 Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2023 08:17:24 +0300 Message-Id: <83a5zqyiaj.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:09:42 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: teika@gmx.com, 62317@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:09:42 -0400 > > >> I think the untested patch below would be enough to plug the hole. > > LGTM, thanks. > > You're thinking of it for `emacs-29`, right? Not necessarily. > Then I had better test it before I push it :-) That's always a good idea. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 05 00:13:11 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2023 04:13:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjuWE-0004Ci-TA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:13:11 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:41265) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjuWD-0004CS-8s for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:13:09 -0400 Received: from localhost ([153.168.51.155]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MxDp4-1qcgzq2tw0-00xeV5; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 06:12:59 +0200 Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 13:12:41 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20230405.131241.640176254664333647.teika@gmx.com> To: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug #62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. In-Reply-To: <83o7o8yqhd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20230401.163649.1533008264124348958.teika@gmx.com> <83o7o8yqhd.fsf@gnu.org> From: Teika Kazura Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VjvR9v+jxAJz+QXT9dlBUJSh/q6J0rZ6iHBN8twvU1wAzqyYrJ9 97CebKCmHhh1+8KFSaKzQPJGu9TDiKAw4GcwP4UVtWUBdRvdXovY67i0EPs8kR1+yvK7nYG ch8ivLNExNs8OWDjMl2rRXhQpHP2RdYO8IpeN1DQH6Ru0JF85NqBx7WHzs5PEQ51xaAG1lG j/JJMf23PCHEPwTzZSrrw== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:aCc8lHZZpZs=;7WWum8vbfprak2eIget+YpQTiE0 kSzdGE5l2jyJ2bP+IcR2U4Rh/cY8HzHUPRoEzzi0ypbwPc8IdDiluXZcxDwwMlaQGqU8IDsOH Ku0cdkiVSz9iCDLx6e5luUg2Zk7RDbl+500pNy/NBlhQEMJ6E6zTq120515rL/+h9yy1y26AX 5nsiGcLIAJ6UgQ9vkAGqdFxNuwMpuvgB6Zhn0U1FWubPS4AMeeqs4Q8Kz2yhE5GbP4CxuSXRw M0UfQ/xOyj9huC7e5METpi8KrrYYLkwn7bbV5NmtNeVrMLZDj40PVvKp1gSCUv+2owNyKz4OA YA+Q7y/Mq8TjktJzNFNvSXAkl9M1PEz880LBXpEogf4pg7VG++7n7Xd0JephMOYlmFxnpGILM c4tjd7GXYACOOALGx7VjI7vcrte/2fWEMl7WckHJKFa+zxEJXd3lVFYcaO6S9912L/NUbqbZB RQyYOvJ8eOBrZB6QnOn3663ulqz2kqlnRJgIB1y9k0l5VJjhmpcTF35HVhLwE43DIEX6/5ZtR hsXVDEhZWR/YvUq7WuufskozZ+WAAXDhW+sncIDY/664sAl5ne6GtzGU4U8UKg0l0YdqbvwCz 5rFRH2RMqZCJWk6DUWRrygjx4uArJ982BS55gbCTpcage0okrxlJ/I9J9IV4xMXta2FFrpDRU b0r1ftoUc5HtonoV4SRu3g2jZibYo6Wvr46pfP6B1niBYMpA0WLKCg8dqJFDYNqfIQaCYIF4L TUBZE/HiF4IpCWWwIC6MEYopuaj5IgaS/M6j4JmCO8mJbUQzhv30RAjlwtrmwoJFzx0fXOpkh Dzz5dclj3XUxAvQqypCyVGgV6/cGFOo9fW6me8LgDrgNsW6B2C7RYvD8ZpswovgDA9AAkHa5t Gl/qYWDNSfZcoy5Cw/pRsbPgiLR7+2hePejgJonCdzFUnx8AyHijCTCL3IFvcWUTjK8MHJuDh sbGnpT0h5YF0QD3H1eTaQjeBKgU= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Thanks, that patch works for me. To be precise, I didn't byte-compile `bytecomp.el', (because it failed with batch-byte-compile) so instead I simply deleted bytecomp.elc. BTW > Admittedly, the resulting behavior can be very puzzling&frustrating for > the user, which would tend to argue in favor of trying to at least > detect the problem. Good observation, ethologically and/or sociologically. :) >> What surprises is that `native-compile-async' and `batch-native-compile' generate differnt codes.[...] > This is not surprising at all[...] IMHO a better bug-reporting guide seems desirable (or bug reporting "standard / protocol"). Or else, silly - censorship - untrained users like me will continue complaining, being a burden to developers. After all, coexistence of el, elc, and eln is too complicating. Let me express my gratitude, Eli. Je vous remercie, Stefan; and Grazie to Andrea, though not cc-ed. Best regards, Teika From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 11 20:08:43 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2023 00:08:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfqxO-0006Z8-RS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:08:43 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::234]:49425) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfqxM-0006Yp-EZ for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:08:41 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2b9d07a8d84so83834151fa.3 for <62317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694477310; x=1695082110; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=f4Ca4ixmeqhAlRVdWUl/2vf6jyYX0hGjBM52d+gnb4E=; b=qxh2tNbFi8e7e3JtNerWUv87bmQEYR7slTOMhuioqF/K12PG1keVTaIRVlnJBSUMIT t5Nm2AFBMZ8hsFyWEHNsXZ3H6caZyw8h0+o3Ma1mK/ovNYUz0e6ZU8Mrshu+IbAM+DMc nByD1KeBEIK5tLC5Qs4vDQCSSmM7YVGNfikDMl+M6EBIIM9uZXBUbSevxiw1t7QmlG8N diLlue6Bd9X/RYOjclImLObKtF2Rco8M0quWyJ7s7w6LlBPXpFYM6ZsMrJL+T9sCy5+f RgW7+5tlq+0PUiASVRNkgI3gXnTwZglme8OzQsijlqJ72fyib593wB8w63/npUGQdiTm 6UDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694477310; x=1695082110; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=f4Ca4ixmeqhAlRVdWUl/2vf6jyYX0hGjBM52d+gnb4E=; b=j4L3BF9Fl9sdtih0SnTBhHDOURdQuVN8njOOm2eLwpLSkqhD1zRIltjCwT3pt+meSA EmWwp5CZVimQKklUe/07KDsUZHfyxGQoZjwKIDRtnu7kO9uWLkJkZkKxObUzKguZXOBj suaupA1KGT3g0IKmFLR+hb7KYVolcNMBVTnAhH8CB6WRwWxOPvhLP0LmIu0Fq8Epftvf 1s2M62WeL48E4dWD+bIQLTb/BPKBK/9eKqNiOTCIsjjhxZFxENYs1AixfJ0goKvHzmfA b6etqQJcwy6OrxGvqzjwcq4cwgWpqhjvxFQ2CqeR9sGarQHQ2aN1iZlbEeZhz/pRSxaO 7FMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxRwqbPO8WNu4mERjPJKPCBjwcTgAh/vCu6dcjtf1CHgYgNB+eE pZQtzf0BMn41o2yp9OMFo4R4YmAyRy0H2gpbWO4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IECOUB7YDfQzUbUjV+mz1AoAV8NOMWy6c47z58ZinYpG+5GKNhzwJk419l62uvfq+LzCEUNXaGf0861t8tXCPo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3517:0:b0:2b6:e2aa:8fbc with SMTP id z23-20020a2e3517000000b002b6e2aa8fbcmr8786770ljz.8.1694477310004; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:08:29 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <83a5zqyiaj.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 02 Apr 2023 08:17:24 +0300") References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5zqyiaj.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:08:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 62317 + patch thanks Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stefan Monnier >> Cc: teika@gmx.com, 62317@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:09:42 -0400 >> >> >> I think the untested patch below would be enough to plug the hole. >> > LGTM, thanks. >> >> You're thinking of it for `emacs-29`, right? > > Not necessarily. > >> Then I had better test it before I push it :-) > > That's always a good idea. It seems like this patch was never installed. Could we get it installed please? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 11 20:09:17 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2023 00:09:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfqxx-0006ap-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:09:17 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::235]:57350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfqxv-0006aV-F4 for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:09:16 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bd0bc8b429so87120191fa.2 for <62317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694477345; x=1695082145; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1lBUFzcHi2DpYzvz8hskvxkLsK6qNkZqWF5pmA4QSns=; b=Y4Nq0qo6WEmPB5KkgP/14LfSi8m4MJNeZo71PdeUda0NflFtp+ZqXf60CItxj445UU cF+KMkHycCWf9eFOheBZKxVll86hg2BiWiGXiPhSEMX8eQOwNyFRj2lXuNNM2hR3k/7z u4cS91yVGy6XAq/3FGoiu0Q+dvJHCB77dttPPiKy9qlNyDsecaeDs3urVvmqsQlySgW4 Ks4ANog1VkbqWZxaqdS/hIRqaDz7A0/rhI6jlY1gTX6+zqE1LmStFBYxNdq++UrKO6Z8 V/AleEuDMqdP7droLLyGgN1yBQvK5kaZ6Lxy4vttMRKFDFLP5uCm/ij+JhjTqzgi9g4M AMpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694477345; x=1695082145; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1lBUFzcHi2DpYzvz8hskvxkLsK6qNkZqWF5pmA4QSns=; b=n19lOBBPeZtLLeXiwCZZd0iVMehpYaYh3fAJF7HK090waHl24uDvs+Z58TG4G7nMeX 8KuNGYaEu8UyyLQh3/z4orW4NjPb/BicJwLVmTeqpgA3D0uUQYw7YR+2UWhVNYSZe+wH 0eGg9k+zxklCxOhgTgPRPr4mdJ/PZ2YTAa3s8K5WvcrwTXx1IZWbMt+CvWP2L2D5b1aT mDHwmLc9048nYLp/B7bV8Y2NtsB7SjZNMQfokfMPBVQ271v9nNQRnGVgjcUrZYIurDcz s5ffuLTEy1knR37pltDLbaqhKJ4Oe3acVSs22fcxkx5061FeSguYPwOjHQCkXtP04SZW juNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw137+X3V4eMtyH0F7Vl7mrHMh4zGuE3ZcvOMrQSmNXgwSeZpn1 isQz1DZRpQUdxGJecGEyH2yNp2ns7kLWPQJyEVoW0OSD1WY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEhxXY3muSWavCnMF2Nppeh2Z4fxYPxGgTyVVvXxFCTn9qNDDKxwdX9Fxk1SRF9ZzfuQnVcLEFqoE+Gt++D0zg= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0cc:0:b0:2bc:efa4:2c36 with SMTP id g12-20020a2eb0cc000000b002bcefa42c36mr8840795ljl.11.1694477344993; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:09:04 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:15:33 -0400") References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:09:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. To: Stefan Monnier Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, Teika Kazura X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: > H Teika, > >> I think the untested patch below would be enough to plug the hole. > > Could you test that patch to make sure it fixes the problem for you? > You'll need to first apply the patch, then recompile the > `bytecomp.el` file, and only after that re-try compiling the init > file(s) where you saw the problem. Ping. Teika, did you get a chance to test the patch? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 12 14:12:46 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2023 18:12:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qg7sU-0007kg-De for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:12:46 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:40033) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qg7sR-0007kU-VO for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:12:44 -0400 Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AE690444AFE; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:12:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1694542348; bh=AniENSXash2wKg8Bo7zueMLc1daIp/s1+v0eNWu5qlc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=icwYayROUrH3DxZxVldkIKrgvbVy3xhOfPvQV4DUNxIhgP1kjS4KU938pM7rSKFky d9WdblyripjfuHpItJmq2E3gSLMOHG7HmqFJS2jKbQlrvVFNXOxMgifLhXDBTOlOUY 6x6MoanfnBSkJZggCa9pPPb7b63R4jKQvmeKUgNbRQkMYbtDkiNUAc62LocTSLPLHP 4l75TVpvobgI3QUba/huR2l7fzmroYFZdauiCC8LSAYd1csHJs0zxFs0w0ruY5xTTH HdIz2IWMS88WG/wRQJGBMShNvyuTR21eMxboS1g0gFEiW/IZiCdkEtx+dFoODAfjJk UCaJRFmFWc3NQ== Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0CE65444AF1; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:12:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pastel (unknown [104.247.229.91]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5A7C1201E3; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:12:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:08:29 -0700") Message-ID: References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5zqyiaj.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:12:27 -0400 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL 0.002 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , teika@gmx.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > It seems like this patch was never installed. To be honest, I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. I'd argue that the bug is in having side-effects like that inside `eval-and/when-compile` (or at the top-level of a `require`d file). The patch only caters to changes to the `current_buffer` but there can be many other ways to cause similar troubles and I can't think of a good way to confine them all. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 13 10:02:55 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2023 14:02:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgQSF-0000kQ-82 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:02:55 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::236]:49615) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgQSA-0000jw-MB for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:02:54 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2b9d07a8d84so115567371fa.3 for <62317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 07:02:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694613759; x=1695218559; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NnhGhEccsW30d0pA4scIGvkN2aiL6eDpmSSSyl/StTg=; b=MLaHmbSAQXDXEGYUcAyBkxE+wbFQnAcr79mezxbrBWLAq2jQNf5LqRosSkFDJg7Vcg cCzjbrV97NekHCvwR+PLa3SyV+awf5yr9ovPLZe9bwLyfrF6IlG4PykNi1I/P0LWT0F3 eAQyGX76JuHkOq/qLFZdPRvBmlTtJiJIHqBMT9cv22QOm8KzR+fFddRwRHIS3HD3crSY GKRuGgXkitzAGOeWJHEN3ceEkgplSO318Smb0jM0Exk12Y3WY9Y7QdPsaInkltaSA5FX UEwsuOCkq71dzhtDUj9Pp0Z0pXX3tesXjW/znY5CSFZadlRHwHPw34pWcHaxVJtg5IVr 3JzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694613759; x=1695218559; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NnhGhEccsW30d0pA4scIGvkN2aiL6eDpmSSSyl/StTg=; b=mL9nTjd49RB3F57RdQV/hZzW/0igKfAopjhyWK867TIcfGyuNTwNMDo2Z+6LX1sdjM 8Bi6fIgu113sJcyMLjS6T2QjFjIpOv/1XGXUriTSY4iZKt3eV68yAIQ9nllp08c2b/FW PFGzuwXh1+nPyu1TWuxBmbD6Qw8yS8Tf2nV5254Ytz602kDXULLzmr+0ACnr37z+dL7/ SVg0ni9MtYc6aaXYJ1Mid1hGukpEqJSucVEqRqW5mG46TRX/rSNIduxYrTMnsVatTeiq kTMnupEhTH/OTpc714XIHbm/k3rh2N4tof66w5Tsx8dvKtg3Jq1dmasVtRTd9aYtBaTw zSJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwxnajX16rczEHsAV9jMiRah9qsqKU/hTPYi1QmXRqdcIMweWJY JRzqA4dWBwaWyeLN3SruRs4sLS1cKwxwOGtnvE0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEsWSzXdzdIySabFadgI8u8GEiGcLQo47G7zKuD4sphG1XxVJquV80i9h8pb22WzLOeSqKIyJr7aFK7WPz77Gw= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:330a:0:b0:2b9:f0b4:eaa1 with SMTP id d10-20020a2e330a000000b002b9f0b4eaa1mr2377067ljc.16.1694613759310; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 07:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 07:02:38 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5zqyiaj.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 07:02:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. To: Stefan Monnier Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , teika@gmx.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: >> It seems like this patch was never installed. > > To be honest, I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. > > I'd argue that the bug is in having side-effects like that inside > `eval-and/when-compile` (or at the top-level of a `require`d file). > The patch only caters to changes to the `current_buffer` but there can > be many other ways to cause similar troubles and I can't think of a good > way to confine them all. Good point. It seems rather unusual to call `set-buffer' from the top-level of a required file, to say the least. And if we accept that, users can start calling all kinds of weird and wonderful things. On the other hand, the fix seems innocuous enough. Eli, what do you think? Should we close this as wontfix? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 13 10:45:48 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2023 14:45:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgR7g-0001tS-S8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:45:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgR7b-0001t9-17 for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:45:43 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgR7O-0007hw-Jg; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:45:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=V/upR6mbnlTnh919MJOUbPi3nvIP7qYaSDe8IVtjyek=; b=SU/Yzxk23lrb XyVvvobSF/x88nYO5pWf4WEEs8FJS4lGU9rpz31re9QQ3cBKTRkZbjEteLkNMUza1mriVVzIQFvG7 +msQVORxXg3zCdbsviltfpGXe2ljADoZV3p/sBi/dCTve64vn0mfqSMd82iDyqe5v7/EWX2rPc+FT wvfaVJVN+b/PzKhV0YXt1opDukE8IkRqObu2BS3HuG6lcqeAlY3UmfTKd6ZnXotbJ9EJXPUtPpQWD JFGxsYsB3/a0EjHfyWsuaCgNWI3oEbLg5etei25zlufW8EwjD/6b/fLtzmX8rNiT3KnBA2OFs91GP disbnV4FPBIS6BeI+ZToCA==; Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 17:45:08 +0300 Message-Id: <83wmwum8sr.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 13 Sep 2023 07:02:38 -0700) Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5zqyiaj.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 07:02:38 -0700 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > >> It seems like this patch was never installed. > > > > To be honest, I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. > > > > I'd argue that the bug is in having side-effects like that inside > > `eval-and/when-compile` (or at the top-level of a `require`d file). > > The patch only caters to changes to the `current_buffer` but there can > > be many other ways to cause similar troubles and I can't think of a good > > way to confine them all. > > Good point. It seems rather unusual to call `set-buffer' from the > top-level of a required file, to say the least. And if we accept that, > users can start calling all kinds of weird and wonderful things. > > On the other hand, the fix seems innocuous enough. > > Eli, what do you think? Should we close this as wontfix? Given that Stefan Monnier himself is not sure, yes, I think we should close this as wontfix. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 13 11:47:16 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2023 15:47:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgS5E-0006FK-AE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:47:16 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::235]:53324) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgS59-0006Ep-GU for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:47:15 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bb9a063f26so119273951fa.2 for <62317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:47:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694620020; x=1695224820; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ouyx9agL7jAhRos9q8OzPNhPgrNMf7Vp4n7kdhG+sOU=; b=V/O6dKgYgOKMFL0kOpd0M3kGKh9V99yzcHbXNjJPNw3RVBs4FkOwrnYoXgyd6VFtrf ik37Nj7uVfnoTgSg8PdQVjfbjIjt4TE0Ui4KA7fpV3ZRCRjbS8pBK1YzOogrK4lxaNUT +qV7FwRMalHNs8Ib8QkWxGQwRBwW6pPUnOyEKyydNbLr4kqoSFvP37WzENOQiAn7oJXw EDKmn+XW75mpwtF3xiZ4dUANtug8NSPNGplaLQeqoppZ2WAEzdpaBmAB4uCxPjyo5N0x inBVq7S50yKhLDe+EVhduJYAuj/5NhwjCQFl0BUDQBJ/v82M558VvitVil+oHzxcAC6w +5Zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694620020; x=1695224820; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ouyx9agL7jAhRos9q8OzPNhPgrNMf7Vp4n7kdhG+sOU=; b=JZwMCtSQnFHkwN3DR+j/Bl0EFV5R2hQ2MN0rCEg+Es2SF/H6MqrLm0hvvxo20uUTa8 sH/OuqTeRToHibsXpFVf9NyUl2zDNA/x4JeUjS1NamspmJRFi4vwS66+5Ql0F+2N1bGo ac2fWUY5GjYFxohJtKYQ0Wxszn5Af4KjrDU0x8ALemWxZbmJDrmfPdXPXdKnTQNZdRwV 01M9UHi9/YhlVCevDQjUYGrx+cdnbnnBqhowURYuwbhDZ0HBshRi4H0iaPnGrt9HZTlT Fh7jZ4c5bjvD6iVW40qoUkBM5DuPFJjyDnaVWM7P0fG7BuJbwUHbs5JZYkyEn/uQyNlz BwTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxjptGy244laWx4GNPKoHEuskRkcqL4H/U+zC7Elt+YGSaDWNtM wRW4C3tJa44kxgbDAo5PrVuAtAnLP4G7xDQB6v6TBSNm X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHBJ2vzpDCQdbyfYWn3tPqfO9p8csS0wvdzqFp0JEa4Nu1TJo5Q/GGBsiclV2p0EcngmQolwoFKY8SP80ULHtw= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9989:0:b0:2bc:df3f:7140 with SMTP id w9-20020a2e9989000000b002bcdf3f7140mr2790226lji.17.1694620020017; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:46:59 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <83wmwum8sr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> <83ilefy1d9.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5zqyiaj.fsf@gnu.org> <83wmwum8sr.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:46:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#62317: 28.2; This byte-compiled file behaves wrongly. To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 Cc: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org, teika@gmx.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 62317 + wontfix close 62317 thanks Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Eli, what do you think? Should we close this as wontfix? > > Given that Stefan Monnier himself is not sure, yes, I think we should > close this as wontfix. Thanks, now done. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 14 02:36:06 2023 Received: (at 62317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2023 06:36:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgfxO-0005jx-Bm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:36:06 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:51155) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgfxJ-0005jN-Og for 62317@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:36:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.com; s=s31663417; t=1694673349; x=1695278149; i=teika@gmx.com; bh=EmGpjMzra9eHhPsqDnhpW7vlEuz95ggkF8iaZmFZ+qE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=bRs3cKP2ZhFwEhfgQvfsep+a5vuFMdcERtJfYzORkDkqrDV6WZ0FSm1dIjccFY50elslx3JGpG2 Yt4VM3Hv8T5NB1OYB9x+eKM/adiqNaq8LBwpMxBOjhwmgO1VqJJQnpmvsYsko8bZp6jOBw663z9ef cuEc/TUh2Zqz8gTc6UD6jZs+HFS9fGs8WvFJIvSY3MxV51wbsYJLRbeOMhotLtwzzVqc946mWdpLq bOD1Dw/tewlmvLEFf3KvZkLuA7RcGlDuP+DotaL1yDrGYSkCIYl9JwZX/kdgmpVNbbc4+wH3pH5db 8KHSnZrsozLgLjty+zuWmzoMYR246R6JBTrg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from localhost ([180.15.151.68]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N9MpS-1rlgmn1CeS-015HRR; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:35:49 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 15:35:38 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20230914.153538.1306650581530314786.teika@gmx.com> To: 62317@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#62317 acknowledged by developer From: Teika Kazura In-Reply-To: References: <20230321.125408.609857763486645873.teika@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:J13epTFEcxzyVgDQPAYsW/1THMsAPHytQutCkRztGyTV9OXRvo5 p2k1FF3ayGyQ/2zG8t4Rp1XDw46HFkKpyG5Kz0cLu/E6QcDSw3zWlp2HLj7+JO3/LxY8N54 +jLFBLkVOeqZMzJq8KO1b8guLbr8IXmfsp12fIOPQkllDIGuKcmUMdTWGSs5bWQlEJt4CSA 0pdkn+Bnqdb8Nuxpp+0xQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:tTjQwO7Yx6Q=;85Yo4Gllv9IEXs6tDByuyysFSGm ckdr0u8bsH3qRWo1HttEosWU5z/XBpu1iqlHShbYTkDuuy9AvHoSROhSD9J/q22TEpOnnl3Tr NLLaT4+Qpn2lEjA9XCC9ABGLlLRDh5XpteH93zkXb+3cD7ifDdKKSHazFd+Go+6Zz746va0gq sHweCZ3I94kHdWhKPY3o/shuejalIxEXareZCv6cOaxij6XQeJ5bwKKBatc3fT395PzJ2vkW9 4Us3aCqb4wtpXpT3Mf7pmIHTuq3neOhwCzXRUL+CCzaxhKCmCrxK5Y7JEBm+o/Nt7hWLIZFfC 8N5FXYZ5aWtnYRkCcZO59me4kmrDGU8MyUtjKDU9T32qAGYCXel4RFe8OVLwImbqlN52l0RyJ +1JV/vHu+S0MjX6XGiPZq2aTTNiZZOuGq3kz7yY/TURp0HhN3f12tAVZPWRnkN5FEJ1ouF2PK HupFWEopDNumryZPXC8KubfaLxYefCbrOw8NYYqAGGqL/pz9KSFsVy9ip5NTueev6f8hjvlEe 3qSci4a570pTmXrVyCJBJdctCJ62Fj19aa+GUlJrjMq/xkVm2jMebrZxty0x+zkJDZdVLHbKs RBJmnM9im0pJMe5FfDRYmUA9Aa58NLTSVtRMGvypeyeBlJVD5L8Lp1ZJep+WTkyTQ3brFDX2D qcC6Ry5b0ezxy39jJ4mLsy49FKQilR/THkNqbqae+IOnBw6G2IG26MeDQ2tqoOc2pmpsTVR6k a71HW4dYMG6OTGbtixTseAmQK5RN8WXZSXSA8rEgPV1QlEqHQ2ShWt/9r3BihSrndjcpL1LWT tVuc/jBNKJNnRrTY3fIiCPPKcqxau2qzuynkPfuQvx70w8hxRAFvvgUwH9Ld6re1Dl/rG3BFC gKdvKcDnVxSVPn4fsU3nwp2JBx6X6CZodD9B9/9vCy8KcZ+Dwt0xgjbmzlU4n4xfTHyFc+RfV TRu3+q+1gtDoPTVTNOe3Yr3RyPc= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 62317 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Thanks all, and sorry for untrained report. Best wishes, Teika From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:18:55 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator