GNU bug report logs - #62202
[PATCH 0/21] Juliahub import script.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #71 received at 62202 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>, 62202 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#62202] [PATCH 0/21] Juliahub import script.
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 18:14:00 +0200

Hi Nicolas,

Sorry for the delay. (I was in holidays \o/ :-))

I am not able to apply the series.  Could you rebase it or provide here
by email the commit against which the series apply.  Thanks in advance.


On mer., 15 mars 2023 at 13:47, Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:

>  Took me quite more time than I would've liked, but I have a usable
>  juliahub scheme import script!

Really cool!  Thank you!


>  It seems there's still one edge case that isn't covered and revolves
>  around when Julia packagers don't properly tag their git repos (I've
>  only seen the case with SnoopPrecompile). There's the possibility to
>  rely on tree commit hashes from the General repository (since this is a
>  valid way to identify/store a git repo), but that needs some major
>  changes in the way latest-repository-commit works. Otherwise, it needs
>  to be done by hand. It might also not work for subpackages in
>  directories that are up-to-date on juliahub but not yet on github, I
>  haven't met this case yet.
>
>  I'm sending a patch series in the coming minutes.

Well, I have not read all series. :-)

Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.