GNU bug report logs - #62199
[PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-fdroid.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #62 received at 62199 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andrew Tropin <andrew <at> trop.in>
To: Miguel Ángel Moreno <mail <at> migalmoreno.com>,
 62199 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [bug#62199] [PATCH v5] gnu: Add emacs-fdroid.
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:44:55 +0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 2023-08-26 18:10, Miguel Ángel Moreno wrote:

> On 2023-08-24 17:58, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>
>> On 2023-08-20 19:40, Miguel Ángel Moreno wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-06-21 11:59, Miguel Ángel Moreno wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-06-10 21:43, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Miguel Ángel Moreno <me <at> mianmoreno.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-fdroid): New variable.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
>>>>>> index cad9819a5e..4dff0f85d9 100644
>>>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
>>>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
>>>>>> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ (define-module (gnu packages emacs-xyz)
>>>>>>    #:use-module (guix build-system trivial)
>>>>>>    #:use-module (gnu packages)
>>>>>>    #:use-module (gnu packages admin)
>>>>>> +  #:use-module (gnu packages android)
>>>>>
>>>>> I still get an error with this line. Maybe someone else can test it too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hi Nicolas,
>>>>
>>>> I'm Cc'ing Ludovic, who might be able to test this.  At any rate, do you
>>>> think we can proceed without the fdroidcl input in case the package
>>>> build keeps failing?
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Friendly ping on this issue.  The package still builds successfully for
>>> me at the latest Guix checkout.  Could you test it again, please?
>>
>> Still fails with:
>>
>
> Thanks for the heads up.  It seems like the googletest package is the
> culprit of this issue.  As I alluded to earlier, can we proceed without
> the fdroidcl input in that case?  Given as it's been almost 6 months
> since this issue was raised.

Seems as a reasonable option for me.

-- 
Best regards,
Andrew Tropin

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.