GNU bug report logs - #62163
Suppress logging shepherd evaluation in mcron.log

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>

Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:00:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 62163 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#62163: Suppress logging shepherd evaluation in mcron.log
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:12:49 +0100
Hi Ludo’,

On 2023-04-27 14:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
> 
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
> 
>> Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu> skribis:
>>
>>> On 2023-03-30 11:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You can send messages to the bitbucket with:
>>>>
>>>>   (parameterize ((shepherd-message-port (%make-void-port "w0")))
>>>>     …)
>>>
>>> While it does work for expunging them from mcron log, I noticed that
>>> these lines are also polluting /var/log/messages and the snippet above
>>> doesn't handle that.
>>> Is there perhaps something else I'm missing?
>>
>> Nope, you cannot prevent them from ending up in /var/log/messages; they
>> are purposefully logged.

Perhaps we could have a “low-noise” way to query for running services? (or non modifying actions done on shepherd)
Filling /var/log/messages with messages of (IMO) dubious value seems counterproductive.

> What should we do about this bug?  Am I right that the conclusion is
> that ‘my-heartbeat-job’ could send herd/shepherd output to the bit
> bucket?  If yes, we can close this bug.

Parameterizing the shepherd-message-port did cut the shepherd messages from the mcron log, yes.


Cheers,
Bruno




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 75 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.