From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:50:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6215: Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Pi=C4=85tek?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 16:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6215 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 6215@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.12742006332468 (code B ref -1); Tue, 18 May 2010 16:38:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2010 16:37:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPn5-0000dl-Iy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:37:12 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOz-0000PD-9p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:12:53 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:44385) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOd-0008Lb-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:55 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57414 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEPOU-0000HR-7a for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:54 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,HTML_MESSAGE, PYZOR_CHECK, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOI-00032x-16 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:34 -0400 Received: from mailout1.go2.pl ([193.17.41.11]:40081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOH-0002xH-Nv for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:33 -0400 Received: from mailout1.go2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.104]) by mailout1.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401603001B for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [10.0.0.74]) by mailout1.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 77-253-94-49.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.94.49] by poczta.o2.pl with ESMTP id rStzlY; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Pi=C4=85tek?= Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:48 +0200 Message-ID: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acr2pNGEcxfOoW9jSJG3B61SFd01HA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-O2-Trust: 2, 66 X-O2-SPF: neutral X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:37:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, What is a default priority for every process ? Jarek ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

What is a default priority for every process = ?

 

Jarek

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:50:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6215: default process priority Resent-From: Eric Blake Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 17:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6215 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Pi=C4=85tek?= Cc: 6215@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6215-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6215.12742028593460 (code B ref 6215); Tue, 18 May 2010 17:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 6215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2010 17:14:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEQMz-0000tk-EZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEQMx-0000ta-BS; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:16 -0400 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4IHE9JL027105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:10 -0400 Received: from [10.11.8.195] (vpn-8-195.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.195]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4IHE8Mp011801; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF2CAD8.6020906@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:14:00 -0600 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Lightning/1.0b1 Mnenhy/0.8.2 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> In-Reply-To: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigABFA92AE79C6E0DC07FB7558" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.21 X-Spam-Score: -9.3 (---------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.1 (----------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigABFA92AE79C6E0DC07FB7558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable retitle 6215 default process priority thanks [please use a reasonable subject line when posting] On 05/18/2010 10:11 AM, Jaros=B3aw Pi=B1tek wrote: > Hi, >=20 Hello, > What is a default priority for every process ? By default, each process inherits the niceness from its parent. Coreutils' nice(1) can be used to alter niceness of a new process, and also determine the current niceness of your current shell. Niceness often correlates to priorities, but POSIX allows implementations to have priorities independent from niceness, in which case it is up to your operating system how priorities work (although again, the default is likely to be that each process inherits the priority from its parent). --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enigABFA92AE79C6E0DC07FB7558 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJL8srYAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqpP4H/3b4Vs952axS5jhpvvHb7g8W DAp7s6UOi76N+x+Nl5bhFUizHa48nKN5oqQkCkFuMgHmbxO6TNsYlPDc4X1NTaZR OPFelUNV8jZYhqKMQlgYRUx2s5Tj9JF9DUPnb8dUs8VSXfLeDc1IYIMvO1kiTMI5 cUkHTbyKkz8sNbQ8IIkkkQJnGFlmqow2kZTP5NWvAq6d3gAmPglvGI1GAJIqAWZg jHVp55zJfGj4mDggwNXJRAhDYzxOQPkMPyU12aodeIbOC5c8mCGWAAIgkRV08Ggt V1U9cqOqvz8J7NFVzyKnIUK7z6yF7CLLk0ZGNjo51MT6zO1EVEqlM3BPHa8+wMQ= =9V9I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigABFA92AE79C6E0DC07FB7558-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:50:35 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6215: default process priority Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Pi=C4=85tek?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6215 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "'Eric Blake'" Cc: 6215@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6215-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6215.12742642633320 (code B ref 6215); Wed, 19 May 2010 10:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 6215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2010 10:17:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEgLN-0000rU-TB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 06:17:43 -0400 Received: from rekin23.go2.pl ([193.17.41.16]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEe9W-0008K3-20 for 6215@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 03:57:19 -0400 Received: from rekin23.go2.pl (rekin23 [127.0.0.1]) by rekin23.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726FE1288D9 for <6215@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:57:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [10.0.0.74]) by rekin23.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for <6215@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:57:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 87-205-249-80.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.249.80] by poczta.o2.pl with ESMTP id YXQSUC; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:57:12 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Pi=C4=85tek?= References: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> <4BF2CAD8.6020906@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BF2CAD8.6020906@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:58:01 +0200 Message-ID: <3AC00F146CD34477ABD047205F035F2C@jarektoshiba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acr2rY5CnnxUlYEfQ3KQ0YTBwCma7gAeyViw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-O2-Trust: 2, 64 X-O2-SPF: neutral X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 May 2010 06:17:39 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Thank you for your reply. Best regards, -- Jarek -----Original Message----- From: Eric Blake [mailto:eblake@redhat.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:14 PM To: Jaros=B3aw Pi=B1tek Cc: 6215@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#6215: default process priority retitle 6215 default process priority thanks [please use a reasonable subject line when posting] On 05/18/2010 10:11 AM, Jaros=B3aw Pi=B1tek wrote: > Hi, >=20 Hello, > What is a default priority for every process ? By default, each process inherits the niceness from its parent. Coreutils' nice(1) can be used to alter niceness of a new process, and also determine the current niceness of your current shell. Niceness often correlates to priorities, but POSIX allows implementations to have priorities independent from niceness, in which case it is up to your operating system how priorities work (although again, the default is likely to be that each process inherits the priority from its parent). --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:50:35 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Pi=C4=85tek?= Subject: bug#6215: closed (Re: bug#6215: default process priority) Message-ID: References: <20100519192048.GA1494@dementia.proulx.com> <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 6215 X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils Reply-To: 6215@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 19:21:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1274296863-21197-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1274296863-21197-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #6215: default process priority which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 6215@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 6215: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D6215 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1274296863-21197-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 6215-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2010 19:20:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEop7-0005Vi-FS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:20:57 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEop4-0005Vb-VI for 6215-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:20:56 -0400 Received: from dementia.proulx.com (dementia.proulx.com [192.168.230.115]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5A8213A2; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:20:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: by dementia.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03A503CC193; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:20:49 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:20:48 -0600 From: Bob Proulx To: =?utf-8?B?SmFyb3PFgmF3IFBpxIV0ZWs=?= Subject: Re: bug#6215: default process priority Message-ID: <20100519192048.GA1494@dementia.proulx.com> References: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> <4BF2CAD8.6020906@redhat.com> <3AC00F146CD34477ABD047205F035F2C@jarektoshiba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3AC00F146CD34477ABD047205F035F2C@jarektoshiba> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6215-done Cc: 6215-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Jaros=C5=82aw Pi=C4=85tek wrote: > Thank you for your reply. Since this seems to be done I am marking the bug as done. Bob ------------=_1274296863-21197-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2010 16:37:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPn5-0000dl-Iy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:37:12 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOz-0000PD-9p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:12:53 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:44385) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOd-0008Lb-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:55 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57414 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEPOU-0000HR-7a for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:54 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,HTML_MESSAGE, PYZOR_CHECK, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOI-00032x-16 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:34 -0400 Received: from mailout1.go2.pl ([193.17.41.11]:40081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOH-0002xH-Nv for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:33 -0400 Received: from mailout1.go2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.104]) by mailout1.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401603001B for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [10.0.0.74]) by mailout1.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 77-253-94-49.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.94.49] by poczta.o2.pl with ESMTP id rStzlY; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Jaros=B3aw_Pi=B1tek?= To: Subject: Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:48 +0200 Message-ID: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acr2pNGEcxfOoW9jSJG3B61SFd01HA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-O2-Trust: 2, 66 X-O2-SPF: neutral X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:37:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, What is a default priority for every process ? Jarek ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

What is a default priority for every process = ?

 

Jarek

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90-- ------------=_1274296863-21197-1--