From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 18 12:37:13 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2010 16:37:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPn5-0000dl-Iy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:37:12 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOz-0000PD-9p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:12:53 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:44385) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOd-0008Lb-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:55 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57414 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEPOU-0000HR-7a for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:54 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,HTML_MESSAGE, PYZOR_CHECK, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOI-00032x-16 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:34 -0400 Received: from mailout1.go2.pl ([193.17.41.11]:40081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPOH-0002xH-Nv for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:11:33 -0400 Received: from mailout1.go2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.104]) by mailout1.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401603001B for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [10.0.0.74]) by mailout1.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 77-253-94-49.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.94.49] by poczta.o2.pl with ESMTP id rStzlY; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:01 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Jaros=B3aw_Pi=B1tek?= To: Subject: Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:48 +0200 Message-ID: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acr2pNGEcxfOoW9jSJG3B61SFd01HA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-O2-Trust: 2, 66 X-O2-SPF: neutral X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:37:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, What is a default priority for every process ? Jarek ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

What is a default priority for every process = ?

Jarek

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CAF6B5.952E8D90-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 18 13:14:17 2010 Received: (at 6215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2010 17:14:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEQMz-0000tk-EZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEQMx-0000ta-BS; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:16 -0400 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4IHE9JL027105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:10 -0400 Received: from [10.11.8.195] (vpn-8-195.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.195]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4IHE8Mp011801; Tue, 18 May 2010 13:14:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF2CAD8.6020906@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:14:00 -0600 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Lightning/1.0b1 Mnenhy/0.8.2 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Jaros=B3aw_Pi=B1tek?= Subject: Re: bug#6215: default process priority References: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> In-Reply-To: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigABFA92AE79C6E0DC07FB7558" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.21 X-Spam-Score: -9.3 (---------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6215 Cc: 6215@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -10.1 (----------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigABFA92AE79C6E0DC07FB7558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable retitle 6215 default process priority thanks [please use a reasonable subject line when posting] On 05/18/2010 10:11 AM, Jaros=B3aw Pi=B1tek wrote: > Hi, >=20 Hello, > What is a default priority for every process ? By default, each process inherits the niceness from its parent. Coreutils' nice(1) can be used to alter niceness of a new process, and also determine the current niceness of your current shell. Niceness often correlates to priorities, but POSIX allows implementations to have priorities independent from niceness, in which case it is up to your operating system how priorities work (although again, the default is likely to be that each process inherits the priority from its parent). --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enigABFA92AE79C6E0DC07FB7558 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJL8srYAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqpP4H/3b4Vs952axS5jhpvvHb7g8W DAp7s6UOi76N+x+Nl5bhFUizHa48nKN5oqQkCkFuMgHmbxO6TNsYlPDc4X1NTaZR OPFelUNV8jZYhqKMQlgYRUx2s5Tj9JF9DUPnb8dUs8VSXfLeDc1IYIMvO1kiTMI5 cUkHTbyKkz8sNbQ8IIkkkQJnGFlmqow2kZTP5NWvAq6d3gAmPglvGI1GAJIqAWZg jHVp55zJfGj4mDggwNXJRAhDYzxOQPkMPyU12aodeIbOC5c8mCGWAAIgkRV08Ggt V1U9cqOqvz8J7NFVzyKnIUK7z6yF7CLLk0ZGNjo51MT6zO1EVEqlM3BPHa8+wMQ= =9V9I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigABFA92AE79C6E0DC07FB7558-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 19 06:17:43 2010 Received: (at 6215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2010 10:17:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEgLN-0000rU-TB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 06:17:43 -0400 Received: from rekin23.go2.pl ([193.17.41.16]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEe9W-0008K3-20 for 6215@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 03:57:19 -0400 Received: from rekin23.go2.pl (rekin23 [127.0.0.1]) by rekin23.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726FE1288D9 for <6215@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:57:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [10.0.0.74]) by rekin23.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for <6215@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:57:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 87-205-249-80.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.249.80] by poczta.o2.pl with ESMTP id YXQSUC; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:57:12 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Jaros=B3aw_Pi=B1tek?= To: "'Eric Blake'" References: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> <4BF2CAD8.6020906@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BF2CAD8.6020906@redhat.com> Subject: RE: bug#6215: default process priority Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:58:01 +0200 Message-ID: <3AC00F146CD34477ABD047205F035F2C@jarektoshiba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acr2rY5CnnxUlYEfQ3KQ0YTBwCma7gAeyViw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-O2-Trust: 2, 64 X-O2-SPF: neutral X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6215 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 May 2010 06:17:39 -0400 Cc: 6215@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Thank you for your reply. Best regards, -- Jarek -----Original Message----- From: Eric Blake [mailto:eblake@redhat.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:14 PM To: Jaros=B3aw Pi=B1tek Cc: 6215@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#6215: default process priority retitle 6215 default process priority thanks [please use a reasonable subject line when posting] On 05/18/2010 10:11 AM, Jaros=B3aw Pi=B1tek wrote: > Hi, >=20 Hello, > What is a default priority for every process ? By default, each process inherits the niceness from its parent. Coreutils' nice(1) can be used to alter niceness of a new process, and also determine the current niceness of your current shell. Niceness often correlates to priorities, but POSIX allows implementations to have priorities independent from niceness, in which case it is up to your operating system how priorities work (although again, the default is likely to be that each process inherits the priority from its parent). --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 19 15:20:57 2010 Received: (at 6215-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2010 19:20:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEop7-0005Vi-FS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:20:57 -0400 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEop4-0005Vb-VI for 6215-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:20:56 -0400 Received: from dementia.proulx.com (dementia.proulx.com [192.168.230.115]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5A8213A2; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:20:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: by dementia.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03A503CC193; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:20:49 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:20:48 -0600 From: Bob Proulx To: =?utf-8?B?SmFyb3PFgmF3IFBpxIV0ZWs=?= Subject: Re: bug#6215: default process priority Message-ID: <20100519192048.GA1494@dementia.proulx.com> References: <96B843295D8847DF9D37F3B6E175E998@jarektoshiba> <4BF2CAD8.6020906@redhat.com> <3AC00F146CD34477ABD047205F035F2C@jarektoshiba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3AC00F146CD34477ABD047205F035F2C@jarektoshiba> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6215-done Cc: 6215-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Jaros=C5=82aw Pi=C4=85tek wrote: > Thank you for your reply. Since this seems to be done I am marking the bug as done. Bob From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:52:34 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator