GNU bug report logs - #6215
default process priority

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Jarosław Piątek <jarentyp <at> go2.pl>

Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 16:38:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 6215 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 6215 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org:
bug#6215; Package coreutils. (Tue, 18 May 2010 16:38:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jarosław Piątek <jarentyp <at> go2.pl>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 18 May 2010 16:38:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jarosław Piątek <jarentyp <at> go2.pl>
To: <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:11:48 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

 

What is a default priority for every process ?

 

Jarek

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org:
bug#6215; Package coreutils. (Tue, 18 May 2010 17:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 6215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Jarosław Piątek <jarentyp <at> go2.pl>
Cc: 6215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6215: default process priority
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:14:00 -0600
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
retitle 6215 default process priority
thanks

[please use a reasonable subject line when posting]

On 05/18/2010 10:11 AM, Jarosław Piątek wrote:
> Hi,
> 

Hello,

> What is a default priority for every process ?

By default, each process inherits the niceness from its parent.
Coreutils' nice(1) can be used to alter niceness of a new process, and
also determine the current niceness of your current shell.  Niceness
often correlates to priorities, but POSIX allows implementations to have
priorities independent from niceness, in which case it is up to your
operating system how priorities work (although again, the default is
likely to be that each process inherits the priority from its parent).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Set bug title to 'default process priority'. Request was from Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 18 May 2010 17:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org:
bug#6215; Package coreutils. (Wed, 19 May 2010 10:18:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 6215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jarosław Piątek <jarentyp <at> go2.pl>
To: "'Eric Blake'" <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: 6215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#6215: default process priority
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:58:01 +0200
Thank you for your reply.

Best regards,

--
Jarek

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Blake [mailto:eblake <at> redhat.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:14 PM
To: Jarosław Piątek
Cc: 6215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6215: default process priority

retitle 6215 default process priority
thanks

[please use a reasonable subject line when posting]

On 05/18/2010 10:11 AM, Jarosław Piątek wrote:
> Hi,
> 

Hello,

> What is a default priority for every process ?

By default, each process inherits the niceness from its parent.
Coreutils' nice(1) can be used to alter niceness of a new process, and
also determine the current niceness of your current shell.  Niceness
often correlates to priorities, but POSIX allows implementations to have
priorities independent from niceness, in which case it is up to your
operating system how priorities work (although again, the default is
likely to be that each process inherits the priority from its parent).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org






Reply sent to Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 19 May 2010 19:21:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Jarosław Piątek <jarentyp <at> go2.pl>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 19 May 2010 19:21:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #18 received at 6215-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bob Proulx <bob <at> proulx.com>
To: Jarosław Piątek <jarentyp <at> go2.pl>
Cc: 6215-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#6215: default process priority
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:20:48 -0600
Jarosław Piątek wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.

Since this seems to be done I am marking the bug as done.

Bob




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 15 years and 66 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.