Subject: bug#62130: closed (Re: bug#62130: 30.0.50; macos.texi still references ns-popup-font-panel)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 07:50:02 +0000

Your bug report

#62130: 30.0.50; macos.texi still references ns-popup-font-panel

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
62130: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62130
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#62130: 30.0.50; macos.texi still references ns-popup-font-panel
From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
To: David Caldwell <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 09:49:17 +0200
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 13:19:25 -0800
> From: David Caldwell <[email-masked]>
> 
> ns-popup-font-panel was removed in 9370a4763aacbb9278b5be9c92a2484e3652bc29,
> but is still mentioned in doc/emacs/macos.texi (line 206) (emacs-29 and the
> master branch). Maybe delete the whole @subsection?

Thanks, fixed on the emacs-29 branch.

> I had to hunt around for a while to figure out if it was a configuration
> error on my part or if Emacs had changed. Should it get a short line in
> NEWS?  Something like
> 
> "ns-popup-font has been removed. Use M-x menu-set-font instead."

Done.

Subject: 30.0.50; macos.texi still references ns-popup-font-panel
From: David Caldwell <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 13:19:25 -0800
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

ns-popup-font-panel was removed in 9370a4763aacbb9278b5be9c92a2484e3652bc29,
but is still mentioned in doc/emacs/macos.texi (line 206) (emacs-29 and the
master branch). Maybe delete the whole @subsection?

I had to hunt around for a while to figure out if it was a configuration
error on my part or if Emacs had changed. Should it get a short line in
NEWS?  Something like

"ns-popup-font has been removed. Use M-x menu-set-font instead."

-David

[snipping all the runtime details, since this is a doc/source issue]