GNU bug report logs - #62071
openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>

Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 09:50:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #34 received at 62071 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr>,
 Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: 62071 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>
Subject: Re: bug#62071: openjdk <at> 9/10 sources not reproducible
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 23:52:48 +0200
Hi,

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 10:08, Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr> wrote:

>> I was thinking a second time about it and found that not only the newer
>> development of OpenJDK is on GitHub, but also the older versions are
>> available. So I could add another patch like this: 
>>
>> +              (method git-fetch)
>> +              (uri (git-reference
>> +                    (url "https://github.com/openjdk/jdk9")
>
> That’s a good idea.  It shouldn’t change the SHA256 (if it does,
> something’s wrong) so it looks like an no-brainer.

Well, by experience, it is rare that the released tarball contain the
exact same content as the tagged commit.  If it is the case (same SHA256
for both tarball and GitHub tagged release), indeed no-brainer. :-)

Else, some work still remain for the complete preservation of Guix. ;-)

Björn, what is the status of this SHA256?

Cheers,
simon




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 100 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.