GNU bug report logs - #62071
openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Björn Höfling
 <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62071: closed (openjdk <at> 9/10 sources not reproducible)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 09:13:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:12:12 +0100
with message-id <20230316101212.45619eec <at> tangletp>
and subject line Re: bug#62071: openjdk <at> 9/10 sources not reproducible
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #62071,
regarding openjdk <at> 9/10 sources not reproducible
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
62071: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62071
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: openjdk <at> 9/10 sources not reproducible
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:48:53 +0100

Hi,

it looks like the (auto-generated) tarballs for openjdk <at> 9 and openjdk <at> 10
changed their hash, causing a hash mismatch via

    guix build -S openjdk <at> 9 --no-substitutes --no-grafts

I’m not sure why it uses these tarballs in the first place, since we
have a hg-download.

Lars

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
To: Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>
Cc: 62071-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#62071: openjdk <at> 9/10 sources not reproducible
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:12:12 +0100

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:00:21 +0100
Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:48:53 +0100
> Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > it looks like the (auto-generated) tarballs for openjdk <at> 9 and
> > openjdk <at> 10 changed their hash, causing a hash mismatch via
> > 
> >     guix build -S openjdk <at> 9 --no-substitutes --no-grafts
> > 
> > I’m not sure why it uses these tarballs in the first place, since we
> > have a hg-download.  

Changed to hg-download in commit(s):

7636c49b45adb9870cf416c64bde032ec858a820

Thanks for pointing this out.

Björn

[Message part 5 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.