Subject: bug#62071: closed (Re: bug#62071: openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 09:13:01 +0000

Your bug report

#62071: openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
62071: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62071
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#62071: openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible
From: Björn Höfling <[email-masked]>
To: Lars-Dominik Braun <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:12:12 +0100
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:00:21 +0100
Björn Höfling <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:48:53 +0100
> Lars-Dominik Braun <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > it looks like the (auto-generated) tarballs for openjdk@9 and
> > openjdk@10 changed their hash, causing a hash mismatch via
> > 
> >     guix build -S openjdk@9 --no-substitutes --no-grafts
> > 
> > I’m not sure why it uses these tarballs in the first place, since we
> > have a hg-download.  

Changed to hg-download in commit(s):

7636c49b45adb9870cf416c64bde032ec858a820

Thanks for pointing this out.

Björn

Subject: openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible
From: Lars-Dominik Braun <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:48:53 +0100
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

Hi,

it looks like the (auto-generated) tarballs for openjdk@9 and openjdk@10
changed their hash, causing a hash mismatch via

    guix build -S openjdk@9 --no-substitutes --no-grafts

I’m not sure why it uses these tarballs in the first place, since we
have a hg-download.

Lars