GNU bug report logs - #62064
Why is only rust-1.60 exported when 1.65 is defined?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Jonas Møller <jonas <at> moesys.no>

Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 04:46:03 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #45 received at 62064-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: "\(" <paren <at> disroot.org>, 62064-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Jonas Møller <jonas <at> moesys.no>
Subject: Re: bug#62064: Why is only rust-1.60 exported when 1.65 is defined?
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:02:25 -0500

tags 62064 + notabug
quit

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 21:11, paren--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> There's another important reason:
>>
>>   rust != rust-1.60
>
> Well, as discussed in [1]
>
>     [bug#62643] [PATCH] gnu: rust-1.65: Rename package to rust-next.
>
> this report #62064 is not a bug but instead a wish list: upgrade the
> Rust ecosystem.  Therefore, I am in favor to close it.  WDYT?

Done.  We're currently at rust 1.73 on core-updates.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 174 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.