GNU bug report logs - #62064
Why is only rust-1.60 exported when 1.65 is defined?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Jonas Møller <jonas <at> moesys.no>

Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 04:46:03 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>, Jonas Møller <jonas <at> moesys.no>, 62064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62064: Why is only rust-1.60 exported when 1.65 is defined?
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:30:53 +0200
Hi,

On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 21:11, paren--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> There's another important reason:
>
>   rust != rust-1.60

Well, as discussed in [1]

    [bug#62643] [PATCH] gnu: rust-1.65: Rename package to rust-next.

this report #62064 is not a bug but instead a wish list: upgrade the
Rust ecosystem.  Therefore, I am in favor to close it.  WDYT?

1: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/62643

Cheers,
simon




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 174 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.