GNU bug report logs - #62064
Why is only rust-1.60 exported when 1.65 is defined?

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Jonas Møller <jonas <at> moesys.no>, 62064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#62064: Why is only rust-1.60 exported when 1.65 is defined?
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 16:03:09 +0200

Hi,

On mar., 14 mars 2023 at 08:59, Jonas Møller via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> I think it would be best if Guix separated these concerns, by
> disconnecting the "Rust we use to build packages internally" with the
> "Rust that gets installed with `guix install rust`" 

Using your proposal, how do you deal with

    guix install rust rust-foobar

?  Do you expect that rust-foobar is built using the latest Rust or the
internal Rust?

Well, from my point of view, what you would like is that the symbol
’rust-1.65’ would be named “rust-next”.  It is the current way for
several versions; see emacs vs emacs-next.

See https://issues.guix.gnu.org/62643

I propose to close this report once #62643 is merged.

Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.