GNU bug report logs - #62064
Why is only rust-1.60 exported when 1.65 is defined?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Jonas Møller <jonas <at> moesys.no>

Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 04:46:03 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 62064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
To: Jonas Møller <jonas <at> moesys.no>
Cc: 62064 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#62064: Why is only rust-1.60 exported when 1.65 is defined?
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:36:12 -0400
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 8:12 AM Jonas Møller via Bug reports for GNU
Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Guix! The rust.scm file says
>
> ;;; Note: Only the latest versions of Rust are supported and tested.  The
> ;;; intermediate rusts are built for bootstrapping purposes and should not
> ;;; be relied upon.  This is to ease maintenance and reduce the time
> ;;; required to build the full Rust bootstrap chain.
> ;;;
> ;;; Here we take the latest included Rust, make it public, and re-enable tests
> ;;; and extra components such as rustfmt.
>
> And then proceeds to define-public rust as rust-1.60, and I was wondering if there's any particular reason why a year-old version is used rather than the 1.65 version. This seems like a mistake, given that the comment claims that the "latest included Rust" should be made public.
>
> This is especially troublesome for Rust on Guix because of both how fast its ecosystem moves onto new language/tooling features, and because using rustup (the solution for this on other slow-moving distros) relies on pre-built executables that don't work out-of-the-box on Guix.
>
>
> — Mvh Jonas Møller

Hi Jonas,

Is this question in regards to the current or future status of Rust in
Guix? Historically, updating Rust has been considered a core-updates
level change due to the number of dependent packages [0]. Under the
new feature branch workflow there was a recent announcement [1] by the
Rust team that 1.67 is in testing [2].

Can Guix's build farm keep up with Rust's six week release cycle? The
compute looks to be available but I don't recall a discussion for
consideration of storage or a blueprint for pruning old packages.

[0] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-03/msg00002.html
[2] https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/rust-team

Greg




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 173 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.