GNU bug report logs - #62008
[PATCH 0/2] Update Disarchive to 0.5.0

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 19:19:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#62008: closed (Re: wrapping disarchive (was Re: bug#62008:
 closed (Close)))
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 16:04:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#62008: [PATCH 0/2] Update Disarchive to 0.5.0

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 62008 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
62008: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62008
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 62008-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ludo <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: wrapping disarchive (was Re: bug#62008: closed (Close))
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 18:03:24 +0200
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hey Andreas,

On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 at 17:56, Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> wrote:

> I am doing quick bug triage now, to lower the number from 4000
> open bugs. If "old stuff" I mistakenly close is still relevant, would
> you mind opening a new issue on Codeberg?

But it will be an artificial lower number. ;-)

Thanks for this boring janitor work.  I'm going to open on Codeberg;
although I hate such interface.

So closing.

Cheers,
simon
[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Update Disarchive to 0.5.0
Date: Mon,  6 Mar 2023 20:18:14 +0100
Hi,

The first patch removes an annoyance.  Now,

    guix shell disarchive -- disarchive disassemble foo

works without the need to propagate Guile-LZMA or Guile-Gcrypt; which need
Guile itself to trigger the related search paths.

The second patch is a trivial update but since core Guix depends on
Disarchive, please double check. :-)

For instance, guix-minimal fails but it also fails before this patch series.


Cheers,
simon


Simon Tournier (2):
  gnu: disarchive: Wrap program instead of using propagated inputs..
  gnu: disarchive: Update to 0.5.0.

 gnu/packages/backup.scm | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


base-commit: fe9bcf9db24e6f7849ad870e0853c251517fd6f0
-- 
2.38.1



This bug report was last modified 45 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.