GNU bug report logs -
#62008
[PATCH 0/2] Update Disarchive to 0.5.0
Previous Next
Full log
Message #23 received at 62008 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Simon!
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> On mar., 07 mars 2023 at 10:49, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> For this package, I have a slight preference for keeping propagated
>> inputs so that one can use Disarchive as a library.
>
> Well, maybe I am missing a point but currently for Disarchive standalone,
>
> $ guix shell -C disarchive -- disarchive disassemble hello-2.12.1
> Backtrace:
Hmm good point. So maybe we need to wrap after all, and also keep
propagated inputs (as an example, (guix build download) uses the
Disarchive modules directly, not the command.)
I realize that I worked around it in ‘etc/disarchive-manifest.scm’.
>>> + (let* ((effective
>>> + (read (open-pipe* OPEN_READ
>>> + (string-append #$guile-3.0 "/bin/guile")
>>> + "-c" "(write (effective-version))")))
>>
>> (guix build guile-build-system) exports ‘target-guile-effective-version’
>> to do that; it’s more convenient.
>
> I did not know. Well, I will adapt Cuirass and Dezyne too, IIUC. :-)
Awesome.
>
>>> + (modules (list #$output
>>> + #$guile-bytestructures
>>> + #$guile-gcrypt
>>> + #$guile-lzma))
>>
>> This should use (this-package-input "guile-bytestructures“) and similar,
>> for consistency.
>
> Ok. Just for my understanding about the "consistency”, is the procedure
> ’make-gitolite’ from (gnu packages version-conrol) consistent?
It should use ‘this-package-input’ as well, to keep input fields and
inheritance meaningful.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 300 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.