GNU bug report logs - #61996
30.0.50; Submitting elixir-ts-mode and heex-ts-mode

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Wilhelm Kirschbaum <wkirschbaum <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:27:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #58 received at 61996-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Wilhelm Kirschbaum <wkirschbaum <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 61996-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, theo <at> thornhill.no, casouri <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#61996: 30.0.50; Submitting elixir-ts-mode and heex-ts-mode
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:46:41 +0200
> From: Wilhelm Kirschbaum <wkirschbaum <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: 61996 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, casouri <at> gmail.com, theo <at> thornhill.no
> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:14:03 +0200
> 
> Attached are the updated patches with added test cases and
> indentation rule enhancements.

Thanks, installed on master.

> I still see this warning on a non-treesitter build:
> 
> In elixir-ts--forward-sexp:
> elixir-ts-mode.el:490:8: Warning: reference to free variable
>     ‘heex-ts--sexp-regexp’

Doesn't happen here, so I think we are good.

> Random concern: how will backwards compatibility work when the
> grammars get updated?

Let's discuss this when such problems actually happen.  The answer
depends on what kind of incompatibilities are introduced by changes in
the grammars.

> It might just be better to add both modes in one patch if more
> changes are required perhaps?

I'm not sure I understand the question.

In general, we like each commit to be as self-contained and
independent of the others as possible.  Not sure if this answers your
question.

Thanks, I'm closing this bug.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 74 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.