GNU bug report logs - #61989
[PATCH 00/11] Adding Gocryptfs (feature branch)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Leo Famulari" <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: "Felix Lechner" <felix.lechner <at> lease-up.com>
Cc: 61989 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#61989] [PATCH 00/11] Adding Gocryptfs (feature branch)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 19:59:41 -0400

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 15:44, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:21 PM Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 07:05:25PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
>> > I am not sure how to read the Cuirass derivations, but the file
>> > missing for powerpc64le-linux [1] called libgcc_s.so.1 is present on
>> > x86_64:
>> >
>> >     gcc-10.3.0-lib
>> >     gcc-12.1.0-lib
>> >     gcc-12.2.0-lib
>> >     gcc-mesboot-4.9.4
>> >     gfortran-10.3.0-lib
>> >     libgccjit-10.3.0
>>
>> Are you saying that something is broken on powerpc64le-linux? Is it a
>> regression from this branch? Or a pre-existing problem?
>
> I do not know the answers to your questions. With my message, I merely
> tried to address what seemed like a remaining issue in this jobset:
>
>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/go-team
>
> The failed build #547772 I references was part of the latest
> evaluation #283979, but I am not sure how to read those reports.
>
> Most significantly, I do not know if the reports are
> cumulative—meaning that fewer errors later signify that earlier errors
> have been resolved.

Okay. Then your next steps should be identifying Guix developers who have a history of working on the PowerPC port and asking them to take a look. This kind of outreach to the Guix developer community is a critical part of landing big changes like this one.

If you can't find anyone to respond, then it's safe to say we can ignore this problem.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.