GNU bug report logs - #61954
30.0.50; [PATCH] Simplify structured commands in Eshell

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 07:29:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 61954 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#61954: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Simplify structured commands in Eshell
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:15:54 -0700
Hello,

On Fri 03 Mar 2023 at 11:28PM -08, Jim Porter wrote:

> Structured commands are just Eshell flow control commands, like 'if' and
> 'while'. These expected you to set 'eshell-test-body' and
> 'eshell-command-body' when implementing them, and were very hard to get right
> (see bug#12571 for example).
>
> Instead, let's improve Eshell's iterative command evaluation some more so that
> you can write the implementations for these commands like normal. I think this
> is beneficial for two main reasons: a) it should get us closer to replacing
> Eshell's iterative evaluation with the CPS machinery in generator.el
> (bug#37635)[1], and b) third-parties should have an easier time writing their
> own fancy Eshell commands using the command-rewriting hooks.

I think you have typo'd the bug number?

I would like to read about what the advantages of moving to CPS in
particular will be.  My understanding was that CPS is only rarely a good
idea.

-- 
Sean Whitton




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 70 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.