From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6191: invert-face: different behaviour under POSIX and MS-Windows systems Resent-From: Eduard Wiebe Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6191 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 6191@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.127382807610724 (code B ref -1); Fri, 14 May 2010 09:08:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2010 09:07:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCqs8-0002mv-FB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:07:56 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCqrv-0002mn-76 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:07:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:59286) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OCqrh-0005GZ-1q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:07:29 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41434 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCqrc-0008Av-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:07:28 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCqrC-0000R9-8H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:06:59 -0400 Received: from wp093.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.100]:34293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCqrC-0000Qr-1z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:06:58 -0400 Received: from f055154229.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.55.154.229] helo=nirvana.pusto.de); authenticated by wp093.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) id 1OCqrA-000510-IS; Fri, 14 May 2010 11:06:56 +0200 Received: from ew by nirvana.pusto.de with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1OCqrA-00069z-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 11:06:56 +0200 From: Eduard Wiebe User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:06:55 +0200 Message-ID: <86zl02vols.fsf@nirvana.pusto.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ew@pusto.de;1273828018;d2dab0b5; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Hello, i was to emulate "emacs*reverseVideo: true" under MS-Windows and rant in some dark corners of `invert-face'. Here my observations: 0. emacs -Q 1. M-x invert-face RET cursor RET MS-Windows: no effect FreeBSD: no effect 2. M-x invert-face RET default RET MS-Windows: inverts only the background color, not the cursor face, which implies that cursor disappears in almost cases (buffer sections). FreeBSD: inverts both 3. M-x invert-face RET cursor RET MS-Windows: invert cursor face as expected FreeBSD: no effect Tested under 23.1, 23.2 und the trunk version. -- Eduard Wiebe From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6191: invert-face: different behaviour under POSIX and MS-Windows systems Resent-From: Kevin Rodgers Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 03:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6191 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.127389546113367 (code B ref -1); Sat, 15 May 2010 03:51:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2010 03:51:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OD8Oz-0003TV-Fk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:51:01 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OD8Ow-0003TO-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:50:59 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:51984) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OD8Ov-0007gt-LJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:50:57 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51099 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OD8Ou-0003tU-3O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:50:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OD8Or-0000tG-Fo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:50:55 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OD8Or-0000sr-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:50:53 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OD8Om-0005Cu-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 05:50:48 +0200 Received: from c-71-237-24-138.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([71.237.24.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 05:50:48 +0200 Received: from kevin.d.rodgers by c-71-237-24-138.hsd1.co.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 05:50:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory From: Kevin Rodgers Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 21:50:41 -0600 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <86zl02vols.fsf@nirvana.pusto.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-71-237-24-138.hsd1.co.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) In-Reply-To: <86zl02vols.fsf@nirvana.pusto.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) Eduard Wiebe wrote: > i was to emulate "emacs*reverseVideo: true" under MS-Windows and rant > in some dark corners of `invert-face'. What is the difference between the --reverse-video command line option (aka -rv aka -r) and the emacs*reverseVideo:on X resource? -- Kevin Rodgers Denver, Colorado, USA From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:10:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6191: invert-face: different behaviour under POSIX and MS-Windows systems In-Reply-To: <86zl02vols.fsf@nirvana.pusto.de> Resent-From: Eduard Wiebe Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 11:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6191 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.127392403927353 (code B ref -1); Sat, 15 May 2010 11:48:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2010 11:47:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODFpv-000778-GS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 07:47:19 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODFpt-000772-3L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 07:47:18 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:48995) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ODFps-00086z-W1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 07:47:17 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39138 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ODFpq-0001ax-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 07:47:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODFpo-0005KI-Ua for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 07:47:14 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODFpo-0005K9-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 07:47:12 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODFpk-0002A5-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:47:08 +0200 Received: from f055098114.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.55.98.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:47:07 +0200 Received: from usenet by f055098114.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:47:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory From: Eduard Wiebe Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 13:46:59 +0200 Lines: 13 Message-ID: <86ljblfkuk.fsf@nirvana.pusto.de> References: <86zl02vols.fsf@nirvana.pusto.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: f055098114.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:J4pLzjaQ5XsqUz2FCAcxvIwnmHQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) Kevin Rodgers writes: > Eduard Wiebe wrote: >> i was to emulate "emacs*reverseVideo: true" under MS-Windows and rant >> in some dark corners of `invert-face'. > > What is the difference between the --reverse-video command line option > (aka -rv aka -r) and the emacs*reverseVideo:on X resource? Nothing. That was only a trigger. My problem report is about invert-face. -- Eduard Wiebe