From unknown Mon Jun 23 09:41:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#61852: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: whatson@tailcall.au, bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 61852 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 61852@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Andrew Whatson X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Andrew Whatson Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.167753182112669 (code B ref -1); Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:04:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2023 21:03:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWkeq-0003IF-Od for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:41 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51978) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWkel-0003I3-Hd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWkel-0003Yi-2N for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:35 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWkek-0006DD-Qd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:Subject:To:From:in-reply-to: references; bh=KahzvBIvGNopJQXOeRJ/5RlIkxBF+W7qrZYOXNJpv0w=; b=fMzfCY8a5BnAAs der84UtYd+EiSNVn2vbGBRkHgiDItQpyZ9qpeUR/2irKW0S0ZCZsH99g9Jh6Clue6dpZBBeOmvRb3 i2mAQqT5k0uHseaYSe5KdTjDZcyCn3ERuaMzQLcLgWtDhmMGh67wBZcsjssL0e3Q6mQartE/kh3ZD lZsRC+bv+xEGT28ZYaDzFYVeYSLcYNRsWCq5PLO85PLcosXWm9+W9AHH9J3cA/Zz02+LeNk0BuJgQ U+hzbu3N2aaiLHkkyhhqI2T8EUBkF5u7eazb9umq+vJE9VY6T49nQIliH4UckmatikCUHd8dv0iAe ZxFFLo/2YOpjoZRlT/DQ==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pWkek-0003d1-EF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:03:34 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Nonidi 9 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour du Marsault X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 22:03:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi again Andrew, It turns out that the package is not reproducible: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix challenge scheme48-prescheme /gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2 conten= ts differ: no local build for '/gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-= prescheme-1.9.2' https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme4= 8-prescheme-1.9.2: 0fahr4s5qz980zz96xmrwf8r87w56kicxr8s80fvis98q7v5czll https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-s= cheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0jphmcmijk68phwq93qbzszy5pdmnasa3qdcp2nc5wqc25a7kp= xk differing file: /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/prescheme.image 1 store items were analyzed: - 0 (0.0%) were identical - 1 (100.0%) differed - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive $ git log |head -1 commit cf9e0508b26196dc985302776d860a0359652c59 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Any idea what might be wrong? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Mon Jun 23 09:41:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#61852: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible Resent-From: Andrew Whatson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61852 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 61852@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61852.167757324420778 (code B ref 61852); Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:35:01 +0000 Received: (at 61852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2023 08:34:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49630 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWvQw-0005Oa-5I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:34:03 -0500 Received: from reservoir.hosting-cloud.net ([103.146.113.7]:47789) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pWsxm-0000iz-Ec for 61852@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:55:50 -0500 X-Mailborder-Info: host=console.hosting-cloud.net, gmt_time=1677563742, scan_time=4.35s X-Mailborder-Spam-Score: 2.2 X-Mailborder-Spam-X: xx X-Mailborder-Spam-Report: URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, ALL_TRUSTED, SPF_FAIL, DKIM_SIGNED, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, DKIM_INVALID, MB_DMARC_FAIL, KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, Received: from cp61.hosting-cloud.net (unknown [103.119.110.239]) by smtp.hosting-cloud.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D4F37FC08; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:55:34 +1100 (AEDT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 3D4F37FC08 Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=tailcall.au Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=whatson@tailcall.au DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 3D4F37FC08 Authentication-Results: smtp.hosting-cloud.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tailcall.au header.i=@tailcall.au header.b="BFeaOJwx"; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tailcall.au ; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References: To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HHtOad9Gwr/F27j7b+CKo+tMZ9KUGo6lspT3hqvey/E=; b=BFeaOJwxvFTtwIhKaQ8/x3fqKS HfERluIheC6bjUr0dWwDZUCwrDo3aiuwP5EA8uCCDSOoRH5JZQoQ/S35Mzomt1S1pw+u+qrkWE/mZ 9a0Av+pwgKHF92Kosw42B/AoFw8UdUyVvcGJPyR+F6huje7WR5YcyYi6/8oqAikOJw365PS2UyiHg w6Ha+ARrS22VGpeoe3BkHeJoeA/umWRoIt4vK3BMVaHMhfRnTzYS2TbbIxZke2/7DN1lkRZ9lir2e F/8K0WjKXmuQN6sbBRmUIhXeby8iXDpbNC8357ebl6H/0l8shHFH5cXPIqaM9j9SsTArSuIHdzMLc qbT+h3Fg==; X-Spam-Status: No X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-From: whatson@tailcall.au X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.988, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, NICE_REPLY_A -0.09, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0.00) X-HostingCloud-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-ID: 1pWsxR-00AtR3-1f X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information Received: from eft1854679.lnk.telstra.net ([101.187.131.186] helo=[10.0.9.6]) by cp61.hosting-cloud.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pWsxR-00AtR3-1f; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:55:25 +1100 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:55:23 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@inria.fr> Content-Language: en-US From: Andrew Whatson In-Reply-To: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AuthUser: whatson@tailcall.au X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 03:34:01 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi again Andrew, > > It turns out that the package is not reproducible: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ ./pre-inst-env guix challenge scheme48-prescheme > /gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2 contents differ: > no local build for '/gnu/store/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2' > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0fahr4s5qz980zz96xmrwf8r87w56kicxr8s80fvis98q7v5czll > https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qkby7f4nr3lxlm16zmswmka5hgfs6spw-scheme48-prescheme-1.9.2: 0jphmcmijk68phwq93qbzszy5pdmnasa3qdcp2nc5wqc25a7kpxk > differing file: > /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/prescheme.image > > 1 store items were analyzed: > - 0 (0.0%) were identical > - 1 (100.0%) differed > - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive > $ git log |head -1 > commit cf9e0508b26196dc985302776d860a0359652c59 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Any idea what might be wrong? Hmm, interesting! This is an image produced by Scheme 48 dumping its VM state into a file which can be loaded later to save parsing/expansion time. This is the same technique used by Scheme 48 to produce its own initial image. It looks like the "scheme48" package has the same problem: ``` $ guix challenge scheme48 /gnu/store/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2 contents differ: local hash: 0pyygj4nf8fw2xpciy81d01r2b2339bxhgpfdn2zq2wqvsn2ycra https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2: 0pyygj4nf8fw2xpciy81d01r2b2339bxhgpfdn2zq2wqvsn2ycra https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9c47l5cn60zrr9sm0hn55zibf8zmv33l-scheme48-1.9.2: 12wxxqxmpdqgg2fzbcbm68h1jqynz9gqhxzalyspqq7hh2fgr46k differing file: /lib/scheme48-1.9.2/scheme48.image 1 store items were analyzed: - 0 (0.0%) were identical - 1 (100.0%) differed - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive ``` Comparing hex dumps of the files, there are significant differences, and a quick dive through the image dumping code leads into VM and garbage collector details which are over my head. I guess patching Scheme 48 to build deterministic images is out-of-scope and maybe an issue for upstream. > Thanks, > Ludo’. Cheers! Andrew From unknown Mon Jun 23 09:41:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#61852: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 10:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61852 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andrew Whatson Cc: 61852@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61852.167784031327965 (code B ref 61852); Fri, 03 Mar 2023 10:46:02 +0000 Received: (at 61852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2023 10:45:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pY2uW-0007Gz-OU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pY2uU-0007Gk-Uv for 61852@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:11 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY2uN-0000aA-FD; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=CU69ecfKykzE87u0OZlo0G3RsaH5cfXbJNXzYfeZ9Ks=; b=TWtkMsxmsQ3cx0Vxa0xO /GBFCgjbYyxmoYLIqeDQHSKjI2lV9ng6U/NcT0pf/VYUvxEgo09VVnu2qR/ok+RTyej+AO6OJlo0t bS6FzVSkhMWXZf+OvhbNfaxML+X625emuXtG+NsETCpWXr+oEX43gd1StlyRD0mZTxQYubVkcHitW 4z+rJE4bvO7cgpftub96eiDhlvDnLIVsh3y1pQcynzCfWNZfOLagfs+t9s5+ioAcPSJc69EQA7tGe S1N87YsG1Q08ZnsqrJQC1h6JxO3LJSTYFgNupCYXaz0534REphxQviZWsm0m4emI54RRdfX+qkBsC piMtZ1Q8RP0Hcg==; Received: from [193.50.110.138] (helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY2uM-0005Qr-Qi; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 05:45:03 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@inria.fr> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 13 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la Fumeterre X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 11:45:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andrew Whatson's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:55:23 +1000") Message-ID: <878rgeyuz6.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Andrew Whatson skribis: > Comparing hex dumps of the files, there are significant differences, > and a quick dive through the image dumping code leads into VM and > garbage collector details which are over my head. > > I guess patching Scheme 48 to build deterministic images is > out-of-scope and maybe an issue for upstream. Yes, probably! Would you mind reporting it upstream? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Mon Jun 23 09:41:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#61852: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98scheme48-prescheme=E2=80=99?= is not reproducible Resent-From: Andrew Whatson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:46:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61852 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 61852@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61852.167811754813842 (code B ref 61852); Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:46:04 +0000 Received: (at 61852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2023 15:45:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZD20-0003R7-Om for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:45:48 -0500 Received: from reservoir.hosting-cloud.net ([103.146.113.7]:44499) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZ8Bg-0007G1-0S for 61852@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 05:35:26 -0500 X-Mailborder-Info: host=console.hosting-cloud.net, gmt_time=1678098920, scan_time=9.04s X-Mailborder-Spam-Score: 1.8 X-Mailborder-Spam-X: xx X-Mailborder-Spam-Report: URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_05, SPF_FAIL, DKIM_SIGNED, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, MB_DMARC_FAIL, KAM_DMARC_QUARANTINE, DKIM_INVALID, NICE_REPLY_A, Received: from cp61.hosting-cloud.net (unknown [103.119.110.239]) by smtp.hosting-cloud.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E2727FE2A; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 21:34:16 +1100 (AEDT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 9E2727FE2A Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=tailcall.au Authentication-Results: console.hosting-cloud.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=whatson@tailcall.au DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.hosting-cloud.net 9E2727FE2A Authentication-Results: smtp.hosting-cloud.net; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tailcall.au header.i=@tailcall.au header.b="Oy8BS5g8"; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tailcall.au ; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References: Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NK0QAgUWjB1bL8CAEQMCmHNp5bpu6w7ML1HBqHEw4d4=; b=Oy8BS5g8G6tpLN0jJ4ziJM/8Dj Mah0W8BA6B03aj6ChKsWWFxriRH2jBMIJU5kkW0DE6knQ8qRT8XFUTAIUm/5qLttPSfMP6eHpxxeG FazhFD/7Lm9t4d8GiPeaxMCJPsZeCJKb/ESC2hglngW0Osd+SdcFqHyRpX4wZ2qlrPjmGEvfoqYHc oYWgsnNmr4T/BuYQAQ2J/Y22yHyIGo2FxTKXAFTfIrOYM5LURUUGpr+AbHa8fclO5RU8HiJA27Vcu zUwAe0+uxsZl+43HEvVDYokrQiLPjsHvb7Gk38lBTdHymZYmOOgwDYacDIiHbF61j5Mz/pVczjbTj Li5brLNA==; X-Spam-Status: No X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-From: whatson@tailcall.au X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.901, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, NICE_REPLY_A -0.00) X-HostingCloud-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-ID: 1pZ8AT-004L89-0G X-HostingCloud-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information Received: from eft1854679.lnk.telstra.net ([101.187.131.186] helo=[10.0.9.6]) by cp61.hosting-cloud.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pZ8AT-004L89-0G; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 21:34:09 +1100 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 20:34:07 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Content-Language: en-US References: <87zg8yhlcr.fsf@inria.fr> <878rgeyuz6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Andrew Whatson In-Reply-To: <878rgeyuz6.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AuthUser: whatson@tailcall.au X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:45:42 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Andrew Whatson skribis: > >> Comparing hex dumps of the files, there are significant differences, >> and a quick dive through the image dumping code leads into VM and >> garbage collector details which are over my head. >> >> I guess patching Scheme 48 to build deterministic images is >> out-of-scope and maybe an issue for upstream. > > Yes, probably! Would you mind reporting it upstream? No worries, I've emailed the Scheme 48 list about the issue. Cheers, Andrew