GNU bug report logs - #61790
[PATCH core-updates 0/5] Package cleanups: Guile, GnuTLS, ncurses

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#61790: closed ([PATCH core-updates 0/5] Package cleanups:
 Guile, GnuTLS, ncurses)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 21:51:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:50:38 +0100
with message-id <87r0uct7td.fsf_-_ <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#61790: [PATCH core-updates 0/5] Package cleanups: Guile, GnuTLS, ncurses
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #61790,
regarding [PATCH core-updates 0/5] Package cleanups: Guile, GnuTLS, ncurses
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
61790: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61790
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH core-updates 0/5] Package cleanups: Guile, GnuTLS, ncurses
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 19:55:44 +0100

Hello!

Here’s a patch series that’s hopefully not too late, cleaning up core
packages and thus introducing a world rebuild.

I realize this will be annoying to people like Andreas who have been
testing things much higher in the stack (Chromium!).  What we could do
is have ci.guix build more than the “core” subset (the current setting);
it could build ‘etc/release-manifest.scm’, which contains things up
to IceCat.

Thoughts?

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès (5):
  gnu: guile: Remove input labels.
  gnu: gnutls: Remove Guile dependency.
  gnu: gnutls: Deprecate 'gnutls-latest'.
  gnu: gettext: Remove input label.
  gnu: ncurses: Rewrite using gexps.

 gnu/packages/base.scm    |   4 +-
 gnu/packages/gettext.scm |   5 +-
 gnu/packages/guile.scm   |  60 ++++----
 gnu/packages/ncurses.scm | 301 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 gnu/packages/tls.scm     |  62 +++-----
 5 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 232 deletions(-)


base-commit: cb3332808f42beb4c08970ed792875ee145b715c
-- 
2.39.1

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>,
 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>,
 61790-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#61790: [PATCH core-updates 0/5] Package cleanups: Guile,
 GnuTLS, ncurses
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 22:50:38 +0100

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 06:16:46PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> There’s always a risk of course, though I think it’s pretty low in this
>> case (I built everything up to guile{,2.2}-gnutls, which includes like
>> 8h spent in ‘nss’ tests).  Removing the dependency of GnuTLS on Guile is
>> the most desirable part; the rest is more cosmetic.
>
> Okay, if you tried it locally, then I think we can take the risk.

Alright, pushed as 4895846197bd445dd68c832364c667dea4337f8c.

Thank you for your understanding! :-)

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.