GNU bug report logs - #61748
27.2; Eglot should use shell-file-name when launching the language server for a remote file

Previous Next

Full log

Message #122 received at 61748 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Cc: jeberger <at> free.fr, michael.albinus <at> gmx.de, 61748 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#61748: 27.2;
 Eglot should use shell-file-name when launching the language server
 for a remote file
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 18:43:18 +0200

> Cc: jeberger <at> free.fr, 61748 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 14:24:01 +0000
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 2:10 PM Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > Hi João,
> >
> > > At the very least, the documentation of tramp-remote-path should
> > > state that the variable doesn't take immediate effect and that
> > > something must be done (is it really restarting Emacs, or is there
> > > some M-x tramp-cleanup-* thing that has to be done?)
> > >
> > > So, if "anything goes", is such a minimal docstring patch
> > > acceptable?
> >
> > Sure. RTFM :-)
> 
> I didn't complain about the manual.  I complained about the
> variable docstring, which is what people read when changing a
> variable's value.  If you don't think there's a shortcoming
> there feel free to let me know and I won't waste my time.  I
> read your "patches welcome" as meaning that you welcomed
> patches to fix said shortcoming.  If you don't welcome
> patches, say "patches not welcome" instead.

Please be less belligerent, João.  Michael doesn't deserve this
unfriendly attitude.  Even if you disagree with his judgment.

Thanks in advance.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.