GNU bug report logs - #61730
30.0.50; Compiler warnings for delq and delete

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>

Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:30:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 30.0.50

Full log


Message #23 received at 61730 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com, 61730 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#61730: 30.0.50; Compiler warnings for delq and delete
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:45:18 +0100
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Not in my opinion.  I'm sick and tired from seeing compilers emitting
> bogus warnings which require one to spend time verifying perfectly
> correct code, or, worse, modify the code to shut up the compiler.  Do
> we really want to see stuff like
>
>   (setq _ (delq ...))
>
> in our code?

That's a bit of an exaggeration: the code would just look like in the
thousands of other cases where we are not sure whether the element to
delete is not at the head, like

  (setq my-list (delq elt my-list))

which is not worse, even better readable IMO, than a naked `delq'
call.


> If it's really impossible (and I'm not sure it is), then the better
> course of action is to emit the warnings only if the byte compiler was
> requested to be more sensitive to potential issues, similar to GCC's
> "-W*" options.  IOW, if someone wants to lint their code, let them ask
> for a linting compilation.

But I would be okay with that.


Michael.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 286 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.