GNU bug report logs -
#61676
package transformations not honored working from a manifest
Previous Next
Full log
Message #14 received at 61676 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> But noticed that --with-source and --with-patch were not effective for
>>> the jami-with-certs customized package provided by the
>>> guix-pack-manifest.scm manifest.
>>
>> Indeed, that’s expected.
>>
>>> It seems to me that the rewriting options should be honored on any
>>> packages being manipulated, whether they come from the Guix collection,
>>> a file, a manifest or another means.
>>
>> I’m not convinced; I think manifests should be interpreted literally.
>
> Perhaps I do not have the full picture in my head, but if someone calls
> 'guix pack -m my-manifest.scm
> --with-source=some-package=the-source.tar.gz', it'd seem the
> --with-source option pretty useless in this case if it doesn't touch the
> manifest's packages graph. It'd rather it error out with a message
> like: "package rewriting options have no effects for manifests",
> although I'd rather it was possible.
>
> Is there another alternative for the use case I'm after? The only other
> option available seems to be to extend the GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH with a
> module and to use -e '(@@ (my module) jami-with-certs)'; would the
> jami-with-certs graph get rewritten then?
How about using transformations right into your manifest? Would that
work for you?
There’s a one-to-one mapping from command-line options to
‘options->transformation’ (info "(guix) Defining Package Variants").
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 132 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.