Subject: bug#61658: 30.0.50; server-eval-at might handle unreadable results better

From: Robert Pluim <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 10:40:30 +0100

>>>>> On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 17:10:51 -0700, Sean Whitton <[email-masked]> said:

    Sean> Hello,
    Sean> Now implemented.  Doesn't seem to me like a NEWS entry is warranted, but
    Sean> if anyone strongly disagrees I can write one.

It changes the possible behaviour of a public function, so I think it
is warranted (and I have some comments on the docstrings, but Iʼll
address those separately).

Robert
--