GNU bug report logs - #61655
[Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately

Previous Next

Full log

Message #56 received at 61655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: dev <at> rjt.dev, casouri <at> gmail.com, 61655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jacob.fai <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function
 calls, definitions, separately
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:24:14 +0100

Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru> writes:

> On 24/02/2023 09:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> The important question here, I think, is whether we want to split
>>> font-lock-property-faces in two, like I did here.
>> What harm can it do, if done like you did, i.e. the faces are
>> indistinguishable by default?
>
> Not much. We do rename the face this late into the pretest, though.
>
> And if not many modes use it, then it could not be worth it. OTOH, modes 
> sometimes need additional faces, to use for their unique syntactic 
> elements. So more faces could be a good idea, just from that perspective.
>
> So if nobody has objections, I'll install the patch later today.

No objections from me :)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.