GNU bug report logs - #61655
[Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately

Previous Next

Full log

Message #53 received at 61655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: dev <at> rjt.dev, casouri <at> gmail.com, theo <at> thornhill.no, 61655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 jacob.fai <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function
 calls, definitions, separately
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 13:44:42 +0200

> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 13:31:59 +0200
> Cc: dev <at> rjt.dev, casouri <at> gmail.com, theo <at> thornhill.no, 61655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>  jacob.fai <at> gmail.com
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
> 
> On 24/02/2023 09:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> The important question here, I think, is whether we want to split
> >> font-lock-property-faces in two, like I did here.
> > What harm can it do, if done like you did, i.e. the faces are
> > indistinguishable by default?
> 
> Not much. We do rename the face this late into the pretest, though.

That's fine: they were introduced just a few months ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.