GNU bug report logs - #61655
[Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately

Previous Next

Full log

Message #47 received at 61655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: dev <at> rjt.dev, casouri <at> gmail.com, theo <at> thornhill.no, 61655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 jacob.fai <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function
 calls, definitions, separately
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:56:15 +0200

> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 04:31:08 +0200
> Cc: casouri <at> gmail.com, 61655 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jacob.fai <at> gmail.com,
>  Randy Taylor <dev <at> rjt.dev>, Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
> 
> > I'm okay with adding a few more faces to emacs-29, but please hurry,
> > as we don't have too much time for more additions.
> 
> Here's the patch which adds the faces and their uses in all ts modes.

LGTM, thanks.

> The important question here, I think, is whether we want to split 
> font-lock-property-faces in two, like I did here.

What harm can it do, if done like you did, i.e. the faces are
indistinguishable by default?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.