GNU bug report logs -
#61642
intermittent write_wait_fd error when updating
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 61642 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 19 Feb 2023 23:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Nathan Dehnel <ncdehnel <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 19 Feb 2023 23:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
guix v 636b771536b95d15a2fd68b468deeebac97d6bee
substitute: updating substitutes from
'https://substitutes.nonguix.org'... 0.0%Backtrace:
substitute: In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
substitute: 1752:10 17 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
substitute: In unknown file:
substitute: 16 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7fcb3af102a0>)
substitute: In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
substitute: 724:2 15 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure
default-prompt-handle…>)
substitute: In ice-9/eval.scm:
substitute: 619:8 14 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7fcb3af15c80>)))
substitute: In guix/ui.scm:
substitute: 2279:7 13 (run-guix . _)
substitute: 2242:10 12 (run-guix-command _ . _)
substitute: In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
substitute: 1752:10 11 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
substitute: 1752:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
substitute: In guix/scripts/substitute.scm:
substitute: 844:18 9 (_)
substitute: 348:26 8 (process-query #<output: file 4> _
#:cache-urls _ #:acl _)
substitute: In guix/substitutes.scm:
substitute: 382:27 7 (lookup-narinfos/diverse _ _ #<procedure
7fcb38ce3760 …> …)
substitute: 339:31 6 (lookup-narinfos
"https://substitutes.nonguix.org" _ # _ …)
substitute: 262:26 5 (fetch-narinfos _ _ #:open-connection _ # _)
substitute: In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
substitute: 1685:16 4 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
substitute: 1685:16 3 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
substitute: 1780:13 2 (_ #<&compound-exception components:
(#<&error> #<&orig…>)
substitute: 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
substitute: 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
substitute:
substitute: ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
substitute: In procedure write_wait_fd: unimplemented
guix upgrade: error:
`/gnu/store/263q5qr1dcs4j7vxqk10gilv5py06r49-guix-1.4.0-3.d5fece6/bin/guix
substitute' died unexpectedly
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:43:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 61642 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
On dim., 19 févr. 2023 at 17:50, Nathan Dehnel <ncdehnel <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 'https://substitutes.nonguix.org'... 0.0%Backtrace:
[...]
> "https://substitutes.nonguix.org" _ # _ …)
The issue appears to be on the nonguix side, please report to them.
Cheers,
simon
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:47:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On dim., 19 févr. 2023 at 17:50, Nathan Dehnel <ncdehnel <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 'https://substitutes.nonguix.org'... 0.0%Backtrace:
>
> [...]
>
>> "https://substitutes.nonguix.org" _ # _ …)
>
> The issue appears to be on the nonguix side, please report to them.
It's not, since it relates to code in the (guix substitutes) module.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:47:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 11:46, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> wrote:
> It's not, since it relates to code in the (guix substitutes) module.
Do you mean that if "https://substitutes.nonguix.org" is incorrectly
configured, then the code in (guix substitutes) should handle the
error instead of crash with a backtrace?
Cheers,
simon
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Feb 2023 11:08:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 61642 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 11:46, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> wrote:
>
>> It's not, since it relates to code in the (guix substitutes) module.
>
> Do you mean that if "https://substitutes.nonguix.org" is incorrectly
> configured, then the code in (guix substitutes) should handle the
> error instead of crash with a backtrace?
No, but to answer your question, yes.
I don't think this is a server side code/configuration issue. Also see
this older bug for the same issue https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56005
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 20 Feb 2023 11:09:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#61642
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 03 May 2023 20:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 61642 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 11:46, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> wrote:
>>
>>> It's not, since it relates to code in the (guix substitutes) module.
>>
>> Do you mean that if "https://substitutes.nonguix.org" is incorrectly
>> configured, then the code in (guix substitutes) should handle the
>> error instead of crash with a backtrace?
>
> No, but to answer your question, yes.
>
> I don't think this is a server side code/configuration issue. Also see
> this older bug for the same issue https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56005
The Guile-GnuTLS change you submitted in
<https://gitlab.com/gnutls/guile/-/merge_requests/10> may well fix this
issue.
We have yet to put out a new Guile-GnuTLS release, but we should keep an
eye on it.
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 43 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.