GNU bug report logs -
#61558
29.0.60; Indentation with c-ts-mode doesn't work in code guarded by #ifdef..#endif
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> To reproduce:
>
> emacs -Q
> C-x C-f src/dispnew.c RET
> C-u 265 M-g g
> C-e
> RET
>
> The code around there looks like this:
>
> static struct glyph_matrix *
> new_glyph_matrix (struct glyph_pool *pool)
> {
> struct glyph_matrix *result = xzalloc (sizeof *result);
>
> #if defined GLYPH_DEBUG && defined ENABLE_CHECKING
> /* Increment number of allocated matrices. This count is used
> to detect memory leaks. */
> ++glyph_matrix_count; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> #endif
>
> Line 265 is the one indicated with "<<<<<<". Pressing RET goes to
> column 0, not column 2 as expected. It looks like indentation doesn't
> work in code fragments that are guarded by #ifdef..#endif preprocessor
> conditions. I tried several such places, for example, lines 295, 796,
> 1338, 1360, 1745, 2401, 2615, and many more.
>
Yep. We need rules for these in particular. They aren't really
straightforward because the expected indent style varies, afaict. For
example:
#ifdef WINDOWSNT
#include "w32.h"
#endif
compared to
#if defined GLYPH_DEBUG && defined ENABLE_CHECKING
/* Increment number of allocated matrices. This count is used
to detect memory leaks. */
++glyph_matrix_count;
#endif
Is it a correct assuption to think that whatever is inside one of these
if-blocks should indent according to their grand-parents rule?
In this case:
static struct glyph_matrix *
new_glyph_matrix (struct glyph_pool *pool)
{
struct glyph_matrix *result = xzalloc (sizeof *result);
#if defined GLYPH_DEBUG && defined ENABLE_CHECKING
/* Increment number of allocated matrices. This count is used
to detect memory leaks. */
++glyph_matrix_count;
#endif
/* Set pool and return. */
result->pool = pool;
return result;
}
++glyph_matrix_count;
is indented one step from the compound_statement node, right? So we
need a way to "ignore" the parents indentation.
> Strangely, in other places indentation does work: lines 1069, 3119.
>
Yeah, in these cases we have something other than the preproc directive
itself to indent from.
Theo
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 114 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.