From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 10 10:15:20 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2010 14:15:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBTlP-0005dF-Cn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:15:20 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBTlM-0005d9-Sf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:15:17 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:43743) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OBTlI-0001zz-2Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:15:12 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44864 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OBTkX-0003bD-0Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:15:11 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBTjl-0002nZ-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:14:24 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:40581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBTjk-0002n4-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:13:36 -0400 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so736390fxm.0 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 07:13:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=wURR/PD50lvL4u/jymdPdRGEpvjKA8ZCszefa9Uwxjg=; b=WF6Q3nQImxlliXSJku0RVAVpxuFoAQ5l5kSEyR6QdL6KnOM4oeu+ubdqVd+gmTUTe+ 7zHoxsmpdD92bKljMkVE5CrObxsM5sVeolNhJ9EZiK4Z+73HzTz8xJCpcnYGQCc4mvxy gpmhyIOtZ9ejxOjud4wyqNWMr88IRtoX5P/5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=xy0VokcQCgHucww81wRktHa2nu6JWy3n4rrjFfgqqYlwmkCBm6YQLPnEkPmFurjq2F AUcawH7ocOARIGqhUCd+j/jvwEnFT1/Qy6ChujHPso2cSomqktbK0zcqlyr0+Io8aVqj /x30blBixqo0MwnnmSjkyr+Qu3BFnwzPwajYI= Received: by 10.239.136.10 with SMTP id f10mr390429hbf.87.1273500815254; Mon, 10 May 2010 07:13:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.164.81 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 07:13:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:13:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Crashes on w32 because of bad frame initialization To: Emacs Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) I have seen numerous crashes on w32 when a frame has been badly initialized. I wonder if the problem is that frames can get half initialized. In the function Fx_create_frame a bad value coming from a frame parameter (menu-bar-lines . t) will lead to an error in x_default_parameter (f, parameters, Qmenu_bar_lines, make_number (1), "menuBar", "MenuBar", RES_TYPE_NUMBER); Does not that leave the frame half initialized? (I am loooking at the code from a trunk checkout done 2010-05-06.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 10 11:13:26 2010 Received: (at 6155) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2010 15:13:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBUfd-00065f-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:13:25 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBUfc-00065a-NS for 6155@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:13:25 -0400 Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so2515634fxm.3 for <6155@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:13:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iNe4u26poVJhWrFPrUFdBEoNNjVPNl4ytd7QcXZeaig=; b=w8JQD12nHrbZ2aoYG0Fc/Ib2lNgjltuEgrv1SFo6cNkQPOFWqxJuLgL1Q6/9ClmXzb eyoRc8Rrr2vT4H6fpMEmq7Z4UWY8EE19rUOe9UydvgGdOkIKS989NTcbCT8OJS/d0d7A GbvdI/xJblvK6MAfoN8wS9/9k2hzvunvj0ncw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QHapw/0KpIkjGTdbRgQjMc5v4ygaFZuvqRO/MT5jmOfSC+WYgTJQSvhdK+WmD2oIEw 3lfi40NMvMqv229ZbJBT1qP0+PdjwKI++oHwYrWIj/Sc9I5WOIvAsHhwxJQ38j6JGqUD WCMfx844bzvwu2Cwsum3bkw6uUN2lVyFBjXAw= Received: by 10.204.47.98 with SMTP id m34mr530285bkf.35.1273504399151; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:13:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.84.81 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:12:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:12:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6155: Crashes on w32 because of bad frame initialization To: Lennart Borgman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6155 Cc: 6155@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) > I have seen numerous crashes on w32 when a frame has been badly > initialized. I wonder if the problem is that frames can get half > initialized. > > In the function Fx_create_frame a bad value coming from a frame > parameter (menu-bar-lines . t) will lead to an error in > > =C2=A0x_default_parameter (f, parameters, Qmenu_bar_lines, make_number (1= ), > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 "menuBar", "MenuBar", RES_TYPE_NUMBER); > > Does not that leave the frame half initialized? Do you have a recipe to reproduce the problem' Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 10 12:01:24 2010 Received: (at 6155) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2010 16:01:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBVQ4-0006QI-Da for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 12:01:24 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBVQ2-0006QD-Km for 6155@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 12:01:22 -0400 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so923988ewy.15 for <6155@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:01:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wQ9eR547HsNs+Qo/D5FQzkZ8EkHQprGkHDAa9Wfchvo=; b=luaIuQdZga9frBXVPCAid+dXWVfl6DooP1wgPBr63UOCy9+TmefoX3ZMAXDBkiRBFa zYoeavCit9g+H+piMCtBenoa03kbam3xvUuq/I74hQoiBWeJrVpFjJeoeEnC570sIX8o ReyxPT9qIBiy3nQfx5Xm31eGM0p9xY67dRiY0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OuDTIBKtjQEm7y8WNL4dArBBT75rOCCL9kxFr6Jg8LwUx0lCUggqlVg7oD/UHBXJKR Lmzy95ETUcPFKyOr3cnHYlyeeNaHTlg8d6jwX/WCc15ovhZI57fzjWwUcFgCJ437QZU7 x7d1QCFPD/9MdD26bT1aIDuBvI9YIRP+b3hRE= Received: by 10.239.135.2 with SMTP id b2mr376545hbb.206.1273507277338; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:01:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.164.81 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:00:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 18:00:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6155: Crashes on w32 because of bad frame initialization To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6155 Cc: 6155@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrot= e: >> I have seen numerous crashes on w32 when a frame has been badly >> initialized. I wonder if the problem is that frames can get half >> initialized. >> >> In the function Fx_create_frame a bad value coming from a frame >> parameter (menu-bar-lines . t) will lead to an error in >> >> =C2=A0x_default_parameter (f, parameters, Qmenu_bar_lines, make_number (= 1), >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 "menuBar", "MenuBar", RES_TYPE_NUMBER); >> >> Does not that leave the frame half initialized? > > Do you have a recipe to reproduce the problem' I have no exact recipe but I noticed the problem when the above parameter was in the list of parameters to make frame. The `t' in (menu-bar-lines . t) shoudld be a number. In make-frame I got an error and shortly afterwards Emacs crashed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 10 13:42:09 2010 Received: (at 6155) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2010 17:42:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBWzZ-0000lx-GR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 13:42:09 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBWzX-0000lI-HD for 6155@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 13:42:07 -0400 Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so2672360fxm.3 for <6155@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GxDtSlMhy/plSawOTS+qnbTs4zGwBFdpqbLo8nkeZZQ=; b=l2zdWafmY9h12RKbsxQcT3m3yJOsxlTdsLoGkLJVQenQyw6m3LcMKl21pBcF+gOaCV GPMYK1XT1Vf8yzuAdgKi239LmPs1mvXIuUwLXhb0VGq8YdN2oATPDPXWrGVJBPRInOJg 5PgeRfFbjcVG7k12U0qa+crhHGJdrpjE4fkoY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=eDfvW+KqOiAMR6BxFuKR2KQbbyf87gkWSlsbHVEKLFqOqrWVsivpDZy/hkR2PjROeR FVKsXCOCgarSCF+bKEgzfCS7M9dyIEwPIka+qlv24UzW4eL7rPGpX0EDBcpKmt4oZCYY 1E9UPO2rWXR1Pp84kzoIcgU77ALM7VNlr4hzg= Received: by 10.204.133.146 with SMTP id f18mr2326263bkt.153.1273513322137; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.84.81 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 19:41:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6155: Crashes on w32 because of bad frame initialization To: Lennart Borgman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6155 Cc: 6155@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:00, Lennart Borgman wrote: > The `t' in (menu-bar-lines . t) shoudld be a number. In make-frame I > got an error and shortly afterwards Emacs crashed. (progn (push '(menu-bar-lines . t) default-frame-alist) (make-frame)) does not fail for me either. Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 10 14:55:57 2010 Received: (at 6155) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2010 18:55:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBY8z-0001Tn-8x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 14:55:57 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBY8x-0001Ti-Bb for 6155@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 14:55:55 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1369104fgg.15 for <6155@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:55:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nYgtULyTpTXk7OS3oE51MIaCeU8OAts+9vmI+8b+b9A=; b=La/zbGNBW1L8N1a45pM2SqXZxkHfuWcDCFyOBXKh8vSkTyZ7/IOe/cp/9UFmyoEoy8 mWsvRqWWHhXkHm5dYuPScYykVCBDZuXDt8F5SwFLxWnNiD4CFFjebfZbnjAaKt0Uh/2Q dNB8BLjZgHmB9ItlYoYWVZFZ+XzOXxsIwGir4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e3rSmB6YFV2Lg2Qyo93zy9tdmNAWYHHA5vos3qKz6EpJl3rTEZw5lRG8L7qXXzR6uk 4SNOLQ0oFgLEbOVP+fMsNEipCup46zttolOinzcXKG0KvYSXBs2Ead5E9D12Y9XDfEu7 v80gWEsDKkR03yFKfUtzKcSzgpXWKVlTvpGXE= Received: by 10.239.134.1 with SMTP id 1mr414765hbx.190.1273517750132; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:55:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.164.81 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:55:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6155: Crashes on w32 because of bad frame initialization To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6155 Cc: 6155@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrot= e: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 18:00, Lennart Borgman > wrote: > >> The `t' in (menu-bar-lines . t) shoudld be a number. In make-frame I >> got an error and shortly afterwards Emacs crashed. > > (progn > =C2=A0(push '(menu-bar-lines . t) default-frame-alist) > =C2=A0(make-frame)) This should perhaps be (let ((frame-alist (delete '(menu-bar-lines . 1) default-frame-alist))) (setq frame-alist (cons '(menu-bar-lines . t) frame-alist)) (make-frame frame-alist)) but I do not get an error from that now either. Sigh, I thought I had tracked down an example that worked. I wonder what is different now. I will test a bit more. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 10 15:18:10 2010 Received: (at 6155) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2010 19:18:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBYUU-0001f6-6U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 15:18:10 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBYUS-0001eq-5q for 6155@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 15:18:08 -0400 Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so2770533fxm.3 for <6155@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 12:18:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KXRPdW/6mOXmaupT+rZ62OV5HfIusL3fb8Jowv/lBgs=; b=er99X+FK25LrBOB+TuOM/jq/PYMmhXUBk1R3rX4vWr2D73AX8o1yP1DIPvDs1hqpuj TKwWhdi8cjpCsp9RdrcM+dPrK4Lmpg14lDml0Ggtmu1617oT4lbRykvgUyCPoklPnPG6 vznEa4aEU/pDyL0HO9zO4xLyV4Bkk+lmdEGPQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jJTiu72wJan7WXHMZGiq1hCPof4FolDiY+/E5ko9KAjfPkOREoA59QrLak8DI70y2g s5ne2IASM1ptSG2DqJZHtx9FEuwSP49CtCoVsDXAhONYRKmUb+cjPcbLN0dzAY9n2cPd eFn9qr5Nl5tYgw+ha+cX7xKiOZN4hN87q8zEI= Received: by 10.204.21.18 with SMTP id h18mr135938bkb.177.1273519083127; Mon, 10 May 2010 12:18:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.84.81 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 12:17:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 21:17:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6155: Crashes on w32 because of bad frame initialization To: Lennart Borgman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6155 Cc: 6155@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) > This should perhaps be No, I don't think it *should*. > =C2=A0(let ((frame-alist (delete '(menu-bar-lines . 1) default-frame-alis= t))) Unnecessary. `assoc' and friends will find the first matching key. > =C2=A0 =C2=A0(setq frame-alist (cons '(menu-bar-lines . t) frame-alist)) Identical to my `push', only I was using `default-frame-alist' (on purpose)= . > =C2=A0 =C2=A0(make-frame frame-alist)) Unnecessary in my example. `make-frame' already uses `default-frame-alist'. Please try (let ((default-frame-alist default-frame-alist)) (push '(menu-bar-lines . 0) default-frame-alist) (make-frame)) to see that it works. Juanma From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 19:16:39 2011 Received: (at 6155-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 23:16:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgPiR-00086q-66 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:16:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgPiP-00086d-GW for 6155-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:16:38 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34849) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgPiJ-0002aB-Te; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:16:32 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 6155-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#6155: Crashes on w32 because of bad frame initialization References: X-Spook: BLU-97 A/B Mena sniper ANC spies Echelon monarchist fraud X-Ran: RhYk_UfS-A~5l$q=SK4k"\tN>NL*Z|la-VO#u+4[gkGuKo^(pkc.@{`[JM?r8$6`hF X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:16:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 10 May 2010 21:17:43 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6155-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) In the absence of a recipe to reproduce the issue or a backtrace from a crash (from a vanilla Emacs with debugging info) I don't think anything can be done. Please reopen or reply to this report if you get either of those. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 12 06:24:00 2011 Received: (at 6155) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2011 10:24:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qga8G-0005en-EP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:24:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qga8E-0005eV-1n; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:23:58 -0400 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2026881ewy.3 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 03:23:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=bQIDEeMieTC3k/6aJejbtNqbqOweXfotGM5vr+mTwIY=; b=oAnQz8Zw3RykSNT3bHhBumGDuFLqfo8RBbnGM17hpK0IfAwfWrUNzyVblDgS2hryWp S2Cbab7YLc2Gj1SREEGmclTffZN+n6/w3HdwYeLF3rmDZa8UpBMx+hY2V3MlLvKMj2+W uDe3hcmQL4HPB+BpI2F4UiGuOepWRd0lgpeZM= Received: by 10.213.22.74 with SMTP id m10mr1773673ebb.117.1310466232106; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 03:23:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.114.16 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 03:23:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lennart Borgman Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:23:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#6155: Crashes on w32 because of bad frame initialization To: 6155@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6155 Cc: 6155-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:16, Glenn Morris wrote: > > In the absence of a recipe to reproduce the issue or a backtrace from a > crash (from a vanilla Emacs with debugging info) I don't think anything > can be done. Please reopen or reply to this report if you get either of > those. I have not gone this crash any more. Perhaps it was related to one of the other bug reports about frames. I think I fixed some system call there, but I do not remember any more. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:14:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator