GNU bug report logs -
#61497
emacs-lsp-treemacs unused leftover icons in sources
Previous Next
Reported by: Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:08:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#61497: emacs-lsp-treemacs unused leftover icons in sources
which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 61497 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
61497: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61497
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Am Dienstag, dem 14.02.2023 um 02:06 +0100 schrieb Jelle Licht:
>> Commit e0d2ec418bb on master removed icons that are unclearly
>> licensed
>> from the sources of emacs-lsp-treemacs. Quoted here:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> gnu: emacs-lsp-treemacs: Remove unclearly licensed icons.
>>
>> emacs-lsp-treemacs bundles icons with unclear licenses.
>> See also <https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-treemacs/issues/123>.
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> Some icons are still left in the sources, in the 'icons/vscode'
>> directory' of the source tarball one builds by running `guix build
>> --source emacs-lsp-treemacs'. I have never used vscode, and am
>> unfamiliar with the licensing situation of it and its related icons.
>>
>> In case these icons are also unclearly licensed, I propose we follow
>> the same strategy as done earlier by Liliana, and remove the vscode
>> icons entirely. If the icons are actually licensed under an
>> unproblematic license, it would be nice if they were installed when
>> running `guix install emacs-lsp-treemacs', and the license property
>> of the package updated to reflect this fact.
> From what I could gather, vscode-icons [1] are actually CC-BY, but used
> without proper attribution in this package. As for why they're unused,
> I mostly forgot to whitelist them.
>
> Cheers
>
> [1] https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-icons
Fixed + pushed to master in #61649 / 3f222cd5ad,
closing this issue.
- Jelle
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Commit e0d2ec418bb on master removed icons that are unclearly licensed
from the sources of emacs-lsp-treemacs. Quoted here:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
gnu: emacs-lsp-treemacs: Remove unclearly licensed icons.
emacs-lsp-treemacs bundles icons with unclear licenses.
See also <https://github.com/emacs-lsp/lsp-treemacs/issues/123>.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Some icons are still left in the sources, in the 'icons/vscode'
directory' of the source tarball one builds by running `guix build
--source emacs-lsp-treemacs'. I have never used vscode, and am
unfamiliar with the licensing situation of it and its related icons.
In case these icons are also unclearly licensed, I propose we follow the
same strategy as done earlier by Liliana, and remove the vscode icons
entirely. If the icons are actually licensed under an unproblematic
license, it would be nice if they were installed when running `guix
install emacs-lsp-treemacs', and the license property of the package
updated to reflect this fact.
Thanks for any insight,
- Jelle
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 136 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.