GNU bug report logs - #61490
[PATCH 0/1] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 2¹⁰to 2¹⁵

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel <at> yandex.ru>

Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:01:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 61489

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #32 received at 61490 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: 61490 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:02:09 +0100

>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:48:35 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel <at> yandex.ru> said:

    >> Procedural nit: if you put the bug number in the commit message rather
    >> than the Subject, then 'git am' will strip the [PATCH v2] prefix for
    >> us.

    Konstantin> I am not sure I understood. I did not put the bug number in the subject at all,
    Konstantin> it is probably done by debbugs. E.g. if you look at this v2 patch in a browser
    Konstantin> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61490#20 the "Subject" line
    Konstantin> displayed there does not contain a bug number.

Youʼre right, this was because I was reading the report via
debbugs-gnus, which adds the prefix. Sorry about that, although this
is one reason why attaching patches is sometimes better.

    Konstantin> I can add a bug number to the body the next time, but I'm not sure it would make
    Konstantin> debbugs stop adding the prefix.

It was debbugs-gnus, not debbugs, so putting it in the body is fine.

Robert
--
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 175 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.