GNU bug report logs - #61423
[PATCH 0/6] gnu: zrythm: Update to 1.0.0-beta.4.5.62

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Maya Tomasek <maya.tomasek <at> disroot.org>

Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:37:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: kiasoc5 <at> disroot.org

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Mája Tomášek <maya.tomasek <at> disroot.org>
Cc: Alexandros Theodotou <alex <at> zrythm.org>, 61423 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#61423] [PATCH 0/6] gnu: zrythm: Update to 1.0.0-beta.4.5.62
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 11:54:19 +0100
Hi Mája,

Mája Tomášek <maya.tomasek <at> disroot.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> Hi Ludo',
>
>> Hi Maya,
>>
>> Could you look into the suggestions Alexandros made (I agree regarding
>> Carla) and send a v2 of the patch series?
>
> Certainly! Should I open it as another patch? I am not certain how these
> things work.

You don’t need to open a new bug.

Instead, create the messages with:

  git format-patch --subject-prefix="PATCH v2" …

and send them all to 61423 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

> From Antero Mejr (the previous person to update the package):
>> (module-ref (resolve-interface ... 'libbacktrace)
>> was a quick workaround to avoid an cyclical import. It's not ideal and
>> I'm not sure if the maintainers would find it to be acceptable.
>
> Is that line fine? Or should I find some other fix?

No it’s not fine, it should be treated like other packages.

If that causes problem, then we’ll see, but it shouldn’t.

Thanks,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 361 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.